The three basic movements of the spiritual life
Print Friendly Version| On the Road to Peace by John Dear S.J. | Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 |
| Vol. 1, No. 28 |
The prophet Isaiah wrote long ago that the nations of the world must one day climb the mountain of God. There, on the mountaintop, God will instruct them in God's ways. They will learn what God wants them to do. Then, they will proceed back down the mountain, where they will immediately dismantle their weapons, share their resources with one another and live in peace one another and all creation (Isaiah 2:2-5).
With this great text, Isaiah teaches the three basic movements of the spiritual life: climbing the mountain of God; encountering the God of the mountain; and journeying back down the mountain on God's mission of disarmament and peace. In the first movement, the nations of the world climb the mountain of God. This pilgrimage is the spiritual journey of humanity. All nations, cultures, races and religions are called to search diligently for God. That search is like an arduous mountain climb. It takes preparation, discipline, effort, and determination. It is painful and requires faith and hope. We have not come close to realizing, much less beginning, this conscious global search. Yet as Isaiah foretells, one day the nations of the world, including the people of the United States, will realize that there is no meaning or happiness in money, power, consumerism, fame, revenge, presidents, the Pentagon, Wall Street, Hollywood or war. All nations will undertake the spiritual journey toward a Higher Power.
The second movement of the spiritual life is our encounter with the God of the mountain. According to Isaiah, when each one of us individually and the nations of the world collectively encounter God on the mountain, God will speak and we will listen.
Once we arrive on the mountaintop of God, our job is to listen attentively. This is the definition of prayer. Prayer is not so much talking at God, talking to God, complaining to God, yelling at God, or even praising God. Rather, prayer is a falling in silence at the feet of God and listening deliberately, consciously, attentively to God. It is not just letting God get a word in edgewise. It is allowing God to say whatever it is God wants to say to us. It is listening for God, taking God's word seriously, and deciding that no matter what we may think, we are going to obey what God says.
According to Isaiah, as well as Jesus, the prophets and the saints, God has a definite message for us. God wants to speak to us. God wants to tell humanity what God thinks. God wants us to disarm, practice nonviolence and live in peace. Specifically, the text says that God will instruct the nations of the world in God's ways. The nations will learn on the mountaintop that God is a God of nonviolence, that God does not approve of killing, that God does not bless war, that God does not justify warfare, that God does not support retaliatory violence, that God considers our nuclear weapons as idolatry, that God condemns our nuclear arsenal, that God sees war as sinful, that God turns away from our violence, that God despises our imperial domination, that God wants universal peace, and that God wants all people everywhere to live according to the wisdom of nonviolence.
Quite simply, when the nations of the world reach the mountaintop summit, God will command them never to kill or wage war ever again. Instead the nations of the world will be told to live in peace with one another, with all peoples everywhere and with the earth itself. This radical commandment will shock the nations because they define themselves by their power to massacre other people legally.
"From Zion shall go forth instruction, and the word of God from Jerusalem," we are told. "God shall judge between the nations, and impose terms on many peoples." God will instruct us, give us God's word, judge us, and impose terms on us. God will take action. God is in charge. God will be revealed as Teacher, Master, Ruler, Instructor, Commander, and Emperor. God will tell us what to do and from now on, we will do it, individually, collectively, nationally, and internationally.
The third movement of the spiritual life is the journey down the mountain to dismantle our arsenals, create social justice, and promise never to hurt or kill one another or wage war ever again. After we climb the mountain of God and hear God's message of nonviolence, all nations will immediately undertake one specific political, social and economic task: complete, universal disarmament. After meeting God, the nations of the world will pledge never to wage war again. They will beat their swords into plowshares, stop building weapons, and convert every existing weapon of death into an instrument of life. Spears used for killing people will be turned into pruning hooks that can be used to feed people. Instead of hurting and murdering others, these implements will help grow fruits and vegetables so that everyone everywhere will have enough to eat. Instead of raising the sword against another, threatening one another with war, bullets, chemical weapons, bombs, napalm, depleted uranium or nuclear weapons, Isaiah says "they will refuse to train for war again." Once the nations of the world meet the God of the mountain, they will stop studying, funding, building and preparing for warfare and start acting like sons and daughters of God. They will know that God is a God of peace, and become people of peace.
Once we meet God and listen to what God has to say to us, our entire way of living, thinking and being will change, not just individually but communally, nationally and internationally. We will understand that we are all children of God, that every human being is equal, that no one is above another, that every nation is meant to serve every other nation, that the human race is called to reflect the love and peace of God. We will immediately set ourselves to the task of disarmament. According to Isaiah, all nations will commit themselves to nonviolence and agree to the terms of nonviolence outlined by God on the mountaintop. They will end every war, feed every starving child and create nonviolent methods to resolve conflict. The root causes of war, including hunger, poverty, disease, homelessness, unemployment, illiteracy, and greed, will by eliminated. Everyone will be guaranteed sufficient food, housing, healthcare, education, employment, dignity, and the fullness of life. All nations will embrace human diversity and variety with an all-inclusive love because from now on, they will imitate the God they have met on the mountain.
Isaiah tells us that whenever we meet God, we are disarmed. If we encounter God, we will immediately stop our violence and start practicing nonviolence. If we listen to God, we will know that God loves peace and justice and we will work to create peace and justice everywhere. The atrocious lack of peace and justice in our world today, the widespread acceptance of war and injustice, the huge arsenals of weapons around the planet testify that we have not met God, that we have refused to listen to God, that we do not understand the nature of God and that we disobey God's commandments.
The shocking revelation of Isaiah's testimony is that the God we expect to meet on the mountain -- a God of violence, vengeance and wrath -- is not the living God we encounter on the mountain. To our surprise, we meet a God who is not like us at all. Atop the holy mountain, we come face to face with the God of peace, love, compassion and nonviolence. We experience the goodness and loving-kindness of God and worship the God of peace. Because we feel infinitely loved by this compassionate God, we eagerly listen to God's instructions on how to live in the world below. Once we experience the nonviolence of God, we realize that our primary task in life is to become people of nonviolence. Without wasting a second, we immediately embark on the mission God has given us, the social, political, economic, spiritual and revolutionary transformation of the world into a new realm of perfect peace and unconditional love.
When the nations of the world meet the living God and realize that nonviolence is God's way, they will agree to be nonviolent with one another. It is this radical spiritual encounter with a God we do not recognize that leads us to dismantle our weapons, make justice for the poor, reconcile with enemies, and never wage war again.
If the so-called people of faith in the United States worshiped the God of Isaiah, the God of the mountain, the God of peace, we would not support war or wage war in our names, no matter how noble or compelling the cause. We would not pay taxes to support an immoral military budget. We would not occupy and kill people, including children, in Iraq or Afghanistan. We would not maintain thousands of nuclear weapons, militarize outer space or destroy the environment. We would not allow anyone to starve or suffer in misery. If we believed in the God of nonviolence, we would dismantle every nuclear weapon, make restitution to those who suffer in poverty, close down every U.S. military base and U.S. terrorist training school, abolish the death penalty, feed every starving child and refugee, clean up the earth, and create nonviolent international peacemaking teams to solve conflict.
Because we do not believe in the God of peace and nonviolence, because we do not climb the mountain of God, because we have not listened to God's instructions, we do not do the works of peace. We do not practice nonviolence because we do not believe in the God of nonviolence. We do not live in peace because we do not worship the God of peace. We think incorrectly that God supports violence, vengeance, retribution, and war, that God must be just like us, that God is mean and deadly. We think that because we are violent and warlike, God must be too. But we have never met the God of the mountain. Our faith, hope and trust is not placed in the living God of peace, but in the false gods of weapons, the idols of death which we have manufactured to kill our enemies and maintain our unjust global hegemony.
If we dare follow Isaiah's vision, and make that journey up and down the mountain of God, one day we will learn to live in peace with one another and discover the meaning of life.
| Archives | Signup for Weekly E-mail |
This is the last offering of three chapters from John Dear's new book, Transfiguration (featuring a foreword by Archbishop Tutu), published this week by Doubleday It can be ordered at www.amazon.com or your local bookstore. John is currently on a month long national speaking tour of Australia. For information, see www.johndear.org
Are you sure that this has
Are you sure that this has been correctly translated? Isn't it "Thou shalt not MURDER." in the original?
If we did not defend
If we did not defend ourselves in WWII Fr. John would be writing this column in Japanesse or German. If we did not defend ourselves during the Cold War he would be writing this column in Russian, if allowed to write it at all.
Since you ask... I think
Since you ask... I think you're missing the fact that Augustine was not Christ, or equal to Christ in any way, and had no business expropriating pagan thought and making it part of Christian doctrine. I'm not an Augustinian (or a Ciceronian), I'm a Christian.
No person writing for "The Church", even a man who has been beatified, has the ability to rescind divine law, which states unequivocally "Thou Shalt Not Kill", or Jesus' commandment to "Love Your Enemies". It's that simple.
The saints and martyrs who were killed for their beliefs were not going "beyond" divine law at all. They were obeying it, and they said so in so many words, time after time.
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
God Bless our Holy Father
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
Under what conditions would a person or country be able to defend oneself?
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
SaintandSinner, Pax et
SaintandSinner,
Pax et bonum.
As a Brother in Christ (The Prince of Peace) and tertiary of Francis who greated everyone with "Peace and Good, and of Mary (Queen of Peace), how would you answer your own question? Better still, how would Jesus, Francis and Mary answer it? Francis' rule of life was/is to follow the Gospel. I suggest you look there for the answer. Can you picture Francis in combat boots?
God Bless our Holy Father
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
LOL. No, St Francis in his later life would not have entered combat (although I don't think he condemned the crusades). As a secular person I'm also interested in the practical side of these discussions.
I see St Francis' charism as proscribing my actions but I'm not sure that this would be an obligation for the rest of the Church. I think the key question is do you believe in the Church's authority in this area? If so, then my statements are in line with this. If not, why not? I believe I am only defending the common orthodox view of the morality of force and self defense.
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
SaintandSinner, I would
SaintandSinner,
I would agree that you are defending the common orthodox view of the morality of force and self defense as you say, and that is exactly my problem. I do not believe this view is in conformity with the teaching of Christ. If we are to call ourselves Christians, I believe we have to at least acknowledge the standard he set for discipleship and attempt to live by it. Yes, it is a very high standard and difficult to follow. We may never achieve it, but we must not lower it.
I don't believe there are
I don't believe there are any circumstances under which a nation or an individual is morally allowed to kill, even to defend oneself. Many peace-loving people today, like the Christians of the first three centuries AD, take God's commandment "Thou Shalt Not Kill" and Jesus' commandment "Love your Enemies", seriously.
For the first three centuries, Christians refused to kill, or become soldiers in the Roman empire, and were martyred for it. St. Maximilian, who testified at his trial in the year 295 "I cannot serve, I cannot do evil... I will not be a soldier of this world. I am a soldier of Christ" and then was beheaded by the Roman military, is an example. When the Roman emperor Constantine decided to convert, he began a "paganization of Christianity" which culminated in Augustine's doctrine of the "just war" which he actually took from a pagan Roman author, Cicero, who lived centuries before Christ. Up until that time, people in the Christian movement had refused to kill others for any reason.
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
"I don't believe there are
"I don't believe there are any circumstances under which a nation or an individual is morally allowed to kill, even to defend oneself."
So the only question left is convert or dhimmi? Of course there is the more immediate problem of war-like murder rates in our major cities. If you are the provider for a family you have a responsibility to stay alive, even if you must kill your attacker.
Then of course we can raise the question of Hitler. Should we have ignored Hitler?
I personally wouldn't kill
I personally wouldn't kill because I couldn't live with myself. Perhaps if we had actual gun laws in this country we would have the much lower crime rates that they have in all other Western countries. Even though criminals can sometimes get their hands on illegal guns in European countries and Canada, their murder rates are far, far lower than it is here.
As far as Hitler is concerned... no, they shouldn't have ignored him. That's exactly what the other European leaders and Roosevelt did for so long, hoping he was just a lunatic, a buffoon who couldn't possibly be capable of invading other countries. They should have engaged him through diplomatic channels long before they did, and imposed sanctions, etc. so he could grasp that he wasn't going to be able to get away with his plans. Neville Chamberlain's naivete was no doubt partially to blame for the whole war. That's why it's so vitally important today to be able to recognize megalomaniac behavior in leaders, to realize anything can happen even in a democracy.
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
If you could have prevented
If you could have prevented (for example) the rape and murder of your daughter by taking his life, you have culpability in those acts. If your family ends up on the street because you would not defend yourself, you are culpable. Could you forgive yourself then?
The country that had one of the lowest violent and gun crime rates (the last I checked) was Switzerland, where almost all men had been in the military and many have a gun (M-57 for men in their 20's and 30's, rifles after that) in their homes. In England, however, when they took the guns away from the police they had a jump in their violent crime. (In 1997 England banned handguns, here is the result: a staggering jump in violent crime).
If the allies had attempted sanctions against Germany, Hitler would have obtained what he needed from Russia (a major world power), Italy, and Japan. If his exploits in war would be limited, then the Holocaust would have been all the more violent.
I live in a state (Maine)
I live in a state (Maine) where there is one gun for almost every resident, yet we have one of the lowest crime rates. People rarely commit crimes with hunting rifles. I'm sure the vast majority of guns in private ownership in Switzerland are rifles as well.
Britain is famous for never allowing bobbies to carry arms while on normal duty. It is a well-known fact that they carry just nightsticks. That has never changed as far as I am aware. So much for "they" having taken them away. And as for your statistics -- they don't show crimes perpetrated with guns, they show crime overall.
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
You're correct, the police
You're correct, the police never had guns, it was handguns in general that were outlawed in 1997. And yes, I know I am pointing at crime in general. Is a crime with a gun inherently more violent than a crime with a knife or rope?
I would say it is a truism
I would say it is a truism that gun crime is more inherently violent. It's so much easier to kill, and do more damage, from a distance with a gun rather than to stab someone (or certainly to strangle him, if that's what you're talking about). That's why there are often added penalties when a gun is used in a crime.
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1
I would argue that multiple
I would argue that multiple stab wounds or a beating with a blunt object is more violent then a gunshot. Certainly to the physical body, as well as the prolonged attack may have more of a psychological effect. It also takes more violence to thrust a knife into someone then to pull a trigger.
The ability to use a gun at
The ability to use a gun at a distance, as mentioned, makes it easier for many more people to do violence. The more distance from others we have, the less responsibility and guilt people tend to feel. So, although the act may not (in all the examples that could be raised) necessarily be more violent, guns tend to create an environment in which violence comes easier to more people.
Somehow, I'm a bit unnerved that you are thinking about such things as "multiple stab wounds" and "beating with a blunt object" at all. I will be much more courteous to you in the future!
Sorry, I was just trying to
Sorry, I was just trying to illustrate a point, one which you seem to grasp. Yes violence is easier with guns, but coolly pulling the trigger is less violent than other instruments tend toward.
As far as my imagination, living near Philly (350+ murders two years ago, 400+ last year, on pace to top that this year) has some influence.
Hopefully some time in a
Hopefully some time in a good monastery will cure what ails :0)
God Bless our Holy Father
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
Also, weren't there Christian martyrs that were converts in the Roman Army that did not leave that occupation. If I remember correctly they were martyred over failing to give religious homage to Caesar rather that for deserting their duty (Saint George and Saint Sebastian).
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
God Bless our Holy Father
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
I'm a little confused.
Since I'm Catholic, I believe without reservation all the revealed truths that God has given us through the Church. The authoritative explanation of the moral law given by the Church explains that although absolute pacifism is lauditory it is not manditory.
The witness of the saint is often for heroic virtue. Although we should look to the saints for inspiration, when their actions extend beyong the divine positive law this does not create a new obligation.
What am I missing?
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
"What am I missing?" Could
"What am I missing?"
Could the answer be, perhaps, SaintandSinner, the whole meaning of the life of St. Francis?
William D. Lindsey
Did St Francis obligate all
Did St Francis obligate all around him to follow his life or did he call others to join him?
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
Humility? Poverty?
Humility? Poverty? Obedience? Chastity? Zeal? Evangelism? Reducing the message of St Francis to one is a rather shallow look, at best.
And St Francis did not condemn the crusades, he was called to fight another battle.
There are so many beautiful
There are so many beautiful and insightful passages in John's new book, perhaps most of all Jesus' telling the apostles to rise from their terror and not be afraid, just as we should do today:
"We are quite content with the culture of fear and
death, though we are clueless about the spiritual consequences of our indifference, our idolatry, our faithlessness, and our lack of love... as we lie facedown, dead without even knowing it, the transfigured Jesus touches us and speaks to us, saying, "Rise! Live! You are no longer dead! You do not have to be victims of the culture of fear and war any longer."
Another passage to remember as we go about the work of peace, so we will not be intimidated by the culture of total war and vengeance:
"If Jesus is clear about anything, it is his insistence that we are not to live in fear. The commandment "Do not be afraid" appears exactly 365 times in the Bible, more than any other commandment of God.....There is nothing scarier than transfigured beings, risen martyrs, inviting us to follow them, to do what they did, to say the things they said, and to risk martyrdom... fearlessness and resurrection are intimately linked. The new life of peace and nonviolence that Jesus lived and to which he summons us requires fearlessness. God did not create us to live in fear."
Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. Hebrews 11:1







I wonder why so very many
I wonder why so very many Catholics seriously take the anti-adultery Commandment as an absolute rule laid down by God, and agree that there should be no exceptions, loop holes, or weasel words to skirt this Commandment, yet many of these same Catholics seriously use all kinds of creative exceptions, loop holes, or weasel words to skirt the Commandment that forbids killing human beings?
Does the answer to this question lie in the seminal research of Stanley Milgram,
http://www.cba.uri.edu/Faculty/dellabitta/mr415s98/EthicEtcLinks/Milgram.htm (below)
which showed that many people will kill other human beings when an authority figure tells them that it's OK to violate their personal conscience's moral position against killing human beings?
Stanley Milgram's Experiment: "Obedience and Individual Responsibility"
.
Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a study focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - - that they were just following orders of their superiors.
In the experiment, so-called "teachers" (who were actually the unknowing subjects of the experiment) were recruited by Milgram. They were asked administer an electric shock of increasing intensity to a "learner" for each mistake he made during the experiment. The fictitious story given to these "teachers" was that the experiment was exploring effects of punishment (for incorrect responses) on learning behavior. The "teacher" was not aware that the "learner" in the study was actually an actor - - merely indicating discomfort as the "teacher" increased the electric shocks.
When the "teacher" asked whether increased shocks should be given he/she was verbally encouraged to continue. Sixty percent of the "teachers" obeyed orders to punish the learner to the very end of the 450-volt scale! No subject stopped before reaching 300 volts!
At times, the worried "teachers" questioned the experimenter, asking who was responsible for any harmful effects resulting from shocking the learner at such a high level. Upon receiving the answer that the experimenter assumed full responsibility, teachers seemed to accept the response and continue shocking, even though some were obviously extremely uncomfortable in doing so. The study raised many questions about how the subjects could bring themselves to administer such heavy shocks. More important to our interests are the ethical issues raised by such an experiment itself. What right does a researcher have to expose subjects to such stress? What activities should be and not be allowed in marketing research? Does the search for knowledge always justify such "costs" to subjects? Who should decide such issues?
Joe Walker from East Grand Rapids, MI