Amid new allegations, crisis deepens in Polish Church
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
New York
As seems to be inevitable once the contagion of scandal is unleashed, new waves of revelations and accusations have deepened a sense of crisis in the Polish church, still reeling from the impromptu resignation of Warsaw’s new archbishop on Sunday.
Any hope that the departure of Archbishop Stanislaw Wielgus would lay to rest controversies over the alleged collaboration of Polish clergy with the Communist-era security forces quickly dissolved on Monday, as another senior Polish cleric stepped down under the weight of similar allegations, and a major newspaper disclosed a memo from senior officials of the security service, dated 1978, which asserted that twelve Polish bishops were cooperating at that time in plans to influence the Catholic church.
The document cites the twelve bishops only by code names. It describes efforts by the security agency to influence the selection of a successor to Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski of Warsaw, known as the “Primate of the Millennium” for his staunch resistance to the Communists. The Communists were particularly eager that Cardinal Karol Wojtyla of Krakow, who had clashed repeatedly with the government, not be given the job; in the event, Wojtyla was elected in 1978 as Pope John Paul II instead.
In yet another shocking disclosure, the Polish weekly Wrpost unearthed documents claiming that a Polish auxiliary bishop had reported on meetings of the Polish bishops to the secret police from 1963 to 1970, including discussions of the Polish contingent at the Second Vatican Council (1962-65). One document apparently shows that the auxiliary bishop, Jerzy Dabrowski, who operated under the code name “Ignacy,” received a payment of 70,000 Italian lira in November 1965 from the secret police.
Dabrowski was a close confidante to Cardinal Jozef Glemp of Warsaw, and helped broker negotiations in the 1980s that eventually led to the election of a democratic government and the end of the Communist era. Dabrowski died in a car accident in February 1991, and some commentators are now asking if his death might somehow be linked to his relationship with the security agency.
The security forces also apparently hoped to enlist the twelve “cooperating” prelates to attempt to rein in two brother bishops perceived by the Communists as especially recalcitrant – Archbishop Ignacy Tokarczuk of Przemyśl, and Cardinal Henryk Gulbinowicz of Wroclaw.
Polish sources stress that documents drawn from secret service archives often contain inflated claims from security personnel eager to impress their superiors, so their assertions cannot always be taken at face-value. Nevertheless, the general pattern of collaboration by clergy on a wider scale than previously imagined seems clear.
Further disclosures seem inevitable, including the imminent publication of a book by Fr. Tadeusz Isakowicz-Zaleski, a anti-Communist activist who was beaten by the security service, and who says he will document the Communist penetration of the church in Krakow, the archdiocese once led by Wojtyla.
On Monday, Fr. Janusz Bielanski, rector of Krakow’s prestigious Wawel Cathedral, resigned Monday after charges that he too had collaborated with the Communists. Those charges first surfaced more than a year ago, but pressure on Bielanski intensified in recent days.
In general, Polish sources said the recent scandals have been particularly devastating for the church in Poland because they strike at its chief source of pride in the 20th century – its resistance under the Communists.
There was also media speculation Monday that the papal nuncio in Poland, Archbishop Jozef Kowalczyk, might be recalled or reassigned for his reported failure to adequately brief the Vatican about the seriousness of the charges against Wielgus.
Jaroslow Gowin, former editor of the Catholic magazine Znak, said that in the past Kowalczyk has been slow to relay potentially damaging information, citing the case of Archbishop Juliusz Paetz, who resigned from the Pozann archdiocese in March 2002 amid a sexual abuse scandal.
On Monday, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, in effect told Corriere della Sera that the Vatican had been misled.
“When [Wielgus] was nominated, we did not know anything about his collaboration with the secret services,” Re said.
Sources told NCR that researchers from Poland’s Institute of National Memory had long been aware of potentially damaging files about Wielgus, suggesting that whatever screening that went on before his nomination was announced Dec. 6 had been inadequate.
“The people responsible for the procedure of appointing such candidates applied the traditional way of doing it, which means it was without an investigation and was based on their confidence in the truthfulness of the candidate,'' said Jesuit Fr. Dariusz Kowalczyk, the order’s superior in Warsaw.
Observers of the Polish scene say the recent scandals come at an especially vulnerable moment for the church. It no longer has John Paul II as a point of reference, and faces a rapidly secularizing culture. According to recent data from the Pew Global Attitudes Project, just 36 percent of Poles describe religion as a “very important” force in their lives, a figure which is still higher than the European average, but substantially lower than the United States and most of the developing world.
I strongly share your
I strongly share your assessment of the lack of openness and honesty, Malcolm.
For a very lucid and enlightening commentary, I highly recommend a statement that Professor Robert Miller, a law professor at Villanova, put on the First Things blog yesterday. Miller draws a very sharp parallel between how the Vatican has handled this case, and how the American bishops have handled the abuse crisis.
As he notes, the initial statements of the Vatican indicated flatly that the Vatican, including Pope Benedict, knew of Wielgus's past. The latest Vatican statements deny such knowledge. The Vatican is now speaking darkly of conspiratorial forces, including some weird alliance of former Communists and the right wing in the Polish church, which is outraged at the revelations of how common collaboration was. The media is, of course, being blamed and accused of having an anti-Catholic agenda. Some protestors at the Warsaw cathedral were said to have shouted that Jews are behind the plot of embarrassing the church, when Wielgus stepped down.
As Miller's blog states, the Catholic bishops in the U.S. resorted to similar smear tactics when revelations began to pour out about what they knew re: the abuse situation. They accused the media of creating and over-blowing the situation. Then Cardinal Ratzinger backed this analysis.
Miller concludes, "Many faithful Catholics looking at this situation will think that our bishops, rather than their critics, are the ones doing the real harm to the Church here."
Amen. When we see these smokescreens about who knew what when, and when all indicators are that much more was known than has been revealed in both the Wielgus case and the abuse cases in this country, the church's effectiveness as a sacramental sign of salvation in the world is compromised. The responsibility for that compromise does not lie with those who expose the truth, but with those who have been doing the compromising.
William D. Lindsey
In order to become a bishop,
In order to become a bishop, here in Europe we learned that the investigation of the Vatican is mainly on the thinking of the candidate on issues as abortion, celibacy, Vatican II etc. more than on their past. Your thinking must be in line, not your actions. So sometimes they make a mistake. I'm afraid the Poles will have their first African bishop. I'm looking forward to their reaction to that.







Openness and honesty seem to
Openness and honesty seem to be lacking in the pronouncements of the Church's spokesperson about political involvement in Poland.
In order to find out why J.P. II said one thing about the situation in Poland and did the opposite elsewhere, e.g Nicaraugua, I read all the biographies on him.
I found the piece in 'His Holiness' by Berstein and Politi, interesting due to the oft reported claim that he was 'dreaded' by the communinsts.
"Father Andrzej Bardecki, the religion editor of Tygodnik Powszechny, recalls that Zenon Lkiszko, the powerful number two in the Communist regime, made it known that he hoped Wyszynski would name Wojtyla as archbishop. 'Wyszynski has already named six cadidates to succeed Baziak in krakow, ans I didn't approve of any of them,' Kliszko boasted. The communists leader thought Wojtyla would be more open minded, more willing to engage into dialogue, than the prelates on Wyszynski's lists. The comrades were fascinated by Wojtyla's intellectual qualities. Bardecki noted later," both the Primate and Kliszko were wrong'
There are many questions to be answered about the U.S and CIA involvement in the support of Solidarity, which can best be summed up in Zbigniew Brzezinski's words
'We involved the Pope(JPII), directly; and I don't want to talk about it.... I can't go into details, not as long as he is alive... Casey ran it. he continued everything we did, (in the Carter administration) and expanded it...'
With all the allegations about secret involvement in clandestine ops., perhaps now is the time to get to the root of the matter, when many of the participants are still alive, could shed light on the era; 'the truth shall set you free'!