Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ the King
Print Friendly Version| The Peace Pulpit by Bishop Gumbleton | Sunday, November 26, 2006 |
| Homily Archives | Weekly Homily |
We may not have adverted to it, but we should notice that the feast we celebrate today is unusual, even unique I would say, because it's a feast that celebrates one of the titles of Jesus. There's no other feast that does this. We could have, for example, a feast of Jesus the Prophet, or Jesus the Teacher, or Jesus the Shepherd, but we don't do that for reasons that are not totally clear, I guess. We chose the one title that Jesus rejected, and so it's a challenge to reflect on this feast and the scriptures that we have for this feast. And to have drawn forth this truth that is very important for us.
There is a kind of explanation for the feast. It was established very recently, relatively speaking, in the twentieth century. Most of our other feasts go back many, many centuries as part of our whole tradition. Not until 1925 did we have a feast for Christ the King. Pope Pius XI made the determination to put together this feast and spread it throughout the whole Catholic world. And undoubtedly, one of the reasons that he did this was because of what was happening in human history in that part of the 20th century. There was in Germany, the rise of Nazism, and exaggerated nationalism. There was the rising up of Communism, atheism, totalitarian governments that demanded total sovereignty over people, putting a nation or an ideology in place of God. That's what was happening. And so it could have been a very effective thing -- to remind all of the followers of Jesus, "Look, your nation isn't sovereign over you. No ideology can be sovereign over you. Only God can. Jesus is God and Jesus is sovereign over us."
People at the time of course did not heed this message. In Germany, the church itself acceded to Hitler's ideology. I'm not saying totally in any way, but in 1933 the Vatican signed a concordat with Hitler recognizing his regime, accepting it as legitimate and it had been voted upon by the people of Germany, who were Christian by a large majority, and who accepted this ideology -- glorified nationhood, the Fatherland above all. Communism was much more of a totalitarian system that was imposed upon people although there were those who believed in this atheistic ideology and tried to push it throughout the world. It's ironic in a way, I guess, that our present Holy Father, Joseph Ratzinger, as a teenager, following the directives of the church of his time, joined the Hitler Youth, became a Nazi soldier, fighting for the cause of Nazism. How ironic. How wrong. The church at the time simply failed to heed the message that only God can be sovereign over us!
We need to try to delve into this mystery somewhat even though as I mentioned before Jesus totally rejected the idea of his being a king. After one of his most extraordinary signs that he worked, when the thousands were fed in the desert, people wanted to make him king and he went into hiding because he refused to be king and all that it stood for in human history, even in the history of the Chosen People.
When Jesus stands before Pilate, as we hear in today's Gospel, -- "Are you a king?" -- Well, first he doesn't really answer. Pilate presses him. And so in a sense Jesus says, "Alright, you say it. I am a king." But then immediately he wants Pilate to know -- wants us to know -- not a king in the sense of anyone having sovereignty over another, not a king with power, coercion, armies, wealth, prestige. No, Jesus only agrees to be called king according to the interpretation that he gives, "Yes, I'm a king, but the source of my being a king doesn't come from this world." He makes the obvious point, "Of course if I were a king like your king I would have an army. I wouldn't be a helpless person standing here bound in front of you. People would be fighting on my behalf, but I'm not that kind of a king. My kingdom does not come from this world. It's not out of this source. The only kind of reign I have is one that comes from God." And so therefore as Jesus defines his being a king, "I am a witness to the truth and if only you would hear my truth, the world could be changed. The reign of God could happen."
Of course he had preached about the reign of God, and the temple authorities had used that as a way of getting Pilate's attention. "He's calling himself a king. That's a threat to Caesar." So Pilate had to pay attention otherwise he would have dismissed the whole case very quickly. But when Jesus stands before Pilate, he says the kind of king he is -- according to the way of God. He rejects any historical notion, human notion, of being a king. For him, to rule is to serve. He's the servant of all.
As one who gives witness to the truth, Jesus reminds us that the only power God uses, and that he would use as king, is the power of truth, the power of love. That's what can change everything. Not violence. Not force. Not coercion. Love. Being the shepherd who lays down his life for his sheep. Being the one who declares to his disciples, "Greater love than this no one has than to lay down your life for your friend. And you are my friend." So he's telling them, "I lay down my life for you." That's the kind of kingship Jesus exercises. Love . . . caring for people . . . reaching out to the poor and giving them their dignity and their worth.
Pilate had to have been challenged by Jesus when he said, "I'm here to testify to the truth." Was Pilate going to listen to him and accept this truth? He could have but instead he finds a way out of his dilemma. He knows Jesus isn't a threat to Caesar, but he doesn't want to simply let him go and then be reported to Caesar by the Jewish authorities so he makes that offer, "I'll let him go as the custom is to hand someone over at Passover," and those who reject the truth of Jesus say, "No! Crucify him!" Pilate had a chance to make a choice. He wouldn't do it and by not making a choice he really did make a choice -- he gave up Jesus to death.
But what's more important -- each of us, too, are confronted with this message of Jesus, "I am here to testify to the truth. I'm a witness to the truth, the truth of God, the truth that will make you free, the truth that will bring the reign of God into our world." Are we ready to accept that truth? That's the challenge to each one of us today. We raise up Jesus in glory in our Liturgy. We exalt Jesus. We praise Jesus. One of us who is Son of God in power. But it's this Jesus who says, "I'm a witness to the truth and those who hear my voice will follow me." So the question is: Do we hear Jesus? Do we accept his truth? Do we reject violence? Vengeance? Retribution? War? Or do we go along with all of those things, finding some way out as Pilate did, getting off the hook, as we would say? Or will we take the challenge and really follow Jesus? That's the only way we can celebrate this feast with any integrity, with any authenticity -- by saying yes to Jesus as Jesus declares who he is -- the one who reigns by serving, who become the slave of all, gives everything for others.
When each of us is ready to do that, we will begin to experience the reign of God in our own lives and the more that we do that as a whole community, the more we will begin to make the reign of God break forth more clearly, more fully in our world. And so today we must praise Jesus with this title of king, but we must do it according to his way, according to his teaching. And each of us must try to become a servant, slave even, of others, doing all out of love for others as Jesus did. Do it in our individual lives, do it in our families, do it here in our parish community and try to spread this message in our society so that as a nation we change and help to bring about the true reign of God which is a reign of justice, a reign of love, and finally, a reign of peace.
| Homily Archives | Signup for Weekly E-mail |
Here today, Yes, there were
Here today,
Yes, there were many priests and religious who did risk everything to help the victims of Hitler's maddness. But, ponder this. You wrote, "Perhaps you fail to recall that Italy desired to seize the Vatican, stopped only by its offical neutrality?" Yes, I am aware of this fact. What you are telling me is that while many individuals were willing to risk all to save others, the Vatican opted to remain officially "neutral" to save itself. That was, apparently, more important than taking a Gospel stand in opposition to the horror that was going on. The blood of the many martyrs which stained the ground Rome is built on must have cried out.
So, just who did slander the Church if not the Vatican?
This is, in my opinion, another example of a Church that has become more important than its mission. It is the same mentality that was and is behind the child abuse cover up.
Before the Church sets out to purge itself of gays/lesbians, those who practive birth control or any others who question its doctrines, I think it would do well to get its own house in order.
The Vatican's neutrality
The Vatican's neutrality allowed those in the Church to move a little more boldly. The moment the Vatican were to drop its neutrality Germany would have started rounding up Catholics as fast as they were rounding up the Jews. Italy would have invaded the Vatican, ending any efforts in Rome. The religious orders who took in Jewish children to hide among their wards would have been rounded up, along with all the children in their care. I dare say millions more would have died. As it was, the Vatican's activities rattled both German and Italian dictators at times, as the Vatican had a 'loose view of their own neutrality, passing on warnings when it had news of German plans.
By the way here's a link to Mit Brenner Sorge, Pope Pius XI's condemnation of the Third Reich..
World War II is a morally
World War II is a morally mixed bag for everyone. Like other Western powers the Vatican's response is just as mixed. My personal grudge has to do with the Vatican's complicit cooperation with the Ustachi in Croatia. You might want to do some research into Croatia during WWII.
The rabid Catholic Ustachi, who were never censured by the Vatican, held to a most virulent form of fascism. Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and Gays suffered under the Ustachi in numbers which surpassed Nazi Germany relative to size. In fact their leader Fueher Pavelic was welcomed by Pius XII, and their pet bishop Stepanic was immortalized by Cardinal Spellman with a parochial school in New York named for him
I am both Polish and Yugoslavian by birth. On the one hand my Polish family was devastated by the Germans, and on the Croation side they participated in the slaughter of Serbs, as Catholics welcomed by the Vatican. I am glad that I was raised in America and espouse values which make Faith a matter of choice and not a matter of enforcement at the end of a gun barrel. The chosen slogan of the Catholic Ustachi with regards to the Serbs was:
Convert a third, kill a third, run a third out of the country.
They were very successful.
Heretoday, before you become a total Papal apologist, do me the favor to research the Ustachi. In doing so I hope you will find that morality in WWII was suspect in all camps.
I think Benedict has acted
I think Benedict has acted in ways that must be somewhat perplexing to the traditional and orthodox right. It may well be that having grown up and been forced to participate in the Nazi view of Pan Germanism, that Benedict was given first hand experience of how NOT to rule when given absolute authority.
I hope he continues to reach out to those who were distanced by the proclamations of the then Cardinal Ratzinger acting as JPII's enforcer. The world certainly doesn't need any more confrontation. Especially in the religious ideology sphere.
Nazi Germany wasn't the only
Nazi Germany wasn't the only negative example he had, the tulmult caused by the imposition of the Novus Ordo has also been a strong influence in the 'what not to do' department. ;-)
Bishop Gumbleton, thank you,
Bishop Gumbleton, thank you, thank you, thank you...your homilies are so nurturing to my spirit. This one, about Christ the King, is the best homily I have ever heard on this topic. I am so grateful for your voice in our church today. Again, thank you.
Linda Fegan
Writing from a country where
Writing from a country where royalty is not particularly relevant , I found this sermon a refreshing challenge. Thank you.
Englishwoman








Thank you Bishop Gumbleton
Thank you Bishop Gumbleton for slandering the Pope and the Church.
Perhaps you have never heard of Mit Brenner Sorge, smuggled into Germany and read at all Masses? Perhaps you fail to recall that Italy desired to seize the Vatican, stopped only by its offical neutrality? Perhaps the thounds, perhaps millions hidden and smuggled out of German by priests and religious has escaped you attention? Perhaps the catholic martyrs in the concentration camps, from St Maximillian Kolbe, to Bl Anthony and Bl George (MICs), to many more whose names we do not know?
Perhpas you have not heard the the Hitler Youth was not a volunteer organization, that the brothers Ratzinger were drafted into it? Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the fact that Joseph Ratzinger and his classmates were drafted around the age of 16 into the anti-aricraft corps? Perhaps you do not know that when he and his classmates were released from service Joseph Ratziner was re-drafted, this time to work on tank defences on the Hungarian border? Perhaps you are not aware that he deserted?