Pope set to liberalize use of Pre-Vatican II Mass
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Rome
According to reports presently making the rounds, Benedict XVI appears set to issue a document that would liberalize permission for celebration of the Mass in use prior to the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), referred to in popular parlance either as the “Latin Mass” or the “Tridentine Rite.”
Though several sources have confirmed that a text is on its way – generally held to be a motu proprio, or an exercise of the pope’s personal authority – there are varying accounts of what it might contain. Whether it will amount to a “universal indult,” meaning blanket permission for any priest to celebrate the older Mass at any time and in any place, remains to be seen, though most observers seem to believe the authorization will be somewhat more circumscribed, perhaps dependent upon a minimum number of faithful who request it.
Most sources expressed caution in drawing conclusions about the implications of the document before it appears.
Assuming a document is eventually issued, it appears to have been worked out at the most senior levels, bypassing many normal channels. Officials in the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Ecclesia Dei Commission this week all told NCR that they had not been consulted about the text, and in many cases learned about it for the first time from accounts on blogs or in the press.
Speaking on background, Vatican officials repeatedly stressed two points about the older Mass:
• Nothing prevents any priest under current law from celebrating the post-Vatican II, “new” Mass in Latin, and in some cases traditional Catholics don’t notice the difference between the old Mass and the new Mass celebrated reverently in Latin.
• Even if permission for the older Mass is liberalized, it’s unlikely to significantly alter the church’s liturgical practice. The number of Catholics committed to the old Mass, one official said, is less than one percent of the global Catholic population, and most of them have already found parishes or religious orders which provide it. Hence, these officials said, it’s unlikely that “pent-up demand” on a large scale will be unleashed by the new decree.
Vatican sources stress that whatever the document may say, it does not mean that the church is "going back to the Latin Mass." While the pre-Vatican II Mass may become somewhat easier to find, the vast majority of weekly and Sunday liturgies around the world will still be celebrated according to the post-Vatican II rite in the vernacular languages.
While the document may be interpreted in some quarters as a conservative move, sources in Rome said that it's actually more of a pastoral concession in an attempt to heal the only formal schism after Vatican II, which involved traditionalist Catholics attached to the old Mass.
Whether this gesture will be enough to convince them to return, however, remains to be seen. In recent years, the leadership of the Society of St. Pius X, the main body of breakaway traditionalists, has insisted upon two preconditions for any return. One is a "universal indult" for celebration of the old Mass, the other is a right of dissent from teachings of Vatican II which they consider faulty, such as the documents on ecumenism, inter-faith dialigue, and religious freedom. Nothing suggests the new document will address that second point.
Uncertainty as to the fate of the old Mass has been circulating for some time.
During the March 2006 consistory, a gathering of cardinals from around the world, the question of the pre-Vatican II Mass was on the agenda. At the time, several cardinals told NCR that a variety of views were expressed, with no clear consensus.
At the Synod of Bishops on the Eucharist in October 2005, by way of contrast, there was little discussion on the issue. Colombian Cardinal DarĂo CastrillĂłn Hoyos, president of the “Ecclesia Dei Commission” set up to promote reconciliation with traditionalist Catholics, proposed during floor debate that the synod’s final message contain a gesture of outreach to Catholics attached to the old Mass, but that request went unheeded.
A decision to liberalize celebration of the pre-Vatican II Mass, however, would be consistent with Pope Benedict’s appreciative view of the older liturgy, as well as the conviction of senior Vatican officials that the adoption of a new Mass after Vatican II never meant that the older liturgy was abolished.
Most recently, this view was expressed by Archbishop Albert Malcolm Ranjith, Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship, in an interview in the September issue of 30 Giorni: “The fact that the Holy See recently approved the creation in Bordeaux, France, of a society of apostolic life of pontifical right characterized by the exclusive use of the pre-conciliar liturgical books shows unequivocally that the Mass of St. Pius V cannot be considered abolished by the so-called new Missal of Paul VI,” Ranjith said.
Ranjith’s reference to a new religious community was to the Institute of the Good Shepherd, erected to provide a home for Catholic traditionalists who previously were part of the schismatic movement launched by the late French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.
EWTN isn't and never has
EWTN isn't and never has been an authentic example of Roman Catholic Liturgy, particularly the Eucharistic Celebration.
And (once again) I challenge
And (once again) I challenge you to state one way in which the violate the rubrics of the Mass, or deviate from the norms (which have not been specifically limited by the CDW, such as kneeling)?
and again there will be no answer.
I like having the option.
I like having the option. Latin or Regular Mass. I don't know what changes if any will occur with this new Papal document. There's already Latin masses available to those who care to attend. Someone passed me this site a couple of years ago, and I found a Latin Mass being celebrated every Sunday 17 miles from my house. I haven't gone yet because I so enjoy my own church and congregation but I would like to take my girls there some day so the can experience the Mass in Latin.
http://web2.airmail.net/carlsch/MaterDei/churches.htm
Alexjnagem, I really like your post about how you and your wife celebrate Mass. I to bow, pound my chess three times, Cross myself with Holy water entering and exiting the Church. Close my eyes while kneeling with head bowed and praying after communion, I sometimes get so deep in prayer I miss the collection or am startled by people standing speaking and continuing with the Mass.
The only thing Alexjnagem, is I wouldn't worry about what other people are doing. The Mass is their's to experience with God in the manner they choose. Some times I stand tall and look over the whole congregation from one side of the church to the other. I get a wonderful sense of union with my brothers and sisters in GOD. I think it's so great that we are all there together in the name of the Father and of the Son and the Holy Spirit.
God Bless you brother and all! Thank you for sharing.
The more we discover how much we are Loved by God, the more we want to do God's Will
Hmmm. Have we been given the
Hmmm. Have we been given the "sleeves off a vest?" I don't know of any area priests who are qualified to say the Tridentine Mass. Some recent seminarians did not even study the Latin language let alone the Latin liturgy. We had a young priest here try to say "Regina" and it came out "reg-in-a" sounding more like a pasta than a title.
How will local parishes implement this new policy?
Amen alexjnagem. Well said.
Amen alexjnagem. Well said. Praise God!.
Soli Deo Gloria! :-)
The more we discover how much we are Loved by God, the more we want to do God's Will
Why bother? You already
Why bother? You already have a response prepared that permits you to weasel out of any appropriate response I might give because that's what you do. Your answers in the past have been "That document doesn't matter" or "Cardinal screw Vatican II said so". Go argue with someone who cares what you think.
No, I will answer the
No, I will answer the charge, which I cannot do if you remain so vague. You are not trying to dialogue, but impose your view and poison the well. I will defend myself, or make it clear that you have no cause to bring your charges.






God Bless our Holy Father
God Bless our Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI.
In John's article: "Vatican sources stress that whatever the document may say, it does not mean that the church is 'going back to the Latin Mass.' "
I have a little trouble with this. We have a 'Latin Mass' now in that the normative version of the mass is in Latin. No special permission is needed to celebrate in Latin (just look at EWTN's services).
Peace and Good,
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Holy Eucharist)