National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

The Coming CHURCH of RECONCILIATION

It is well to ask “What is the future of Church?” Critical markers to life’s sustainability, political, religious, ecological, economical and personal, point to the urgency of moral consensus and reconciliation, whether or not religious institutions can accommodate.

POLITICAL
“Church” here means the global community of Earth People. As imperial politics globally give way to the surge of democratic awakening it is no longer acceptable for institutions of religion to cling to the imperial political mind and mode of dominion theology.

Imperial/ dominion culture is antithetical to the Word and Spirit of Christian witness, and is no longer credible or acceptable to the “sense of the faithful.” Characteristic of the Coming Church is reconciliation, and recognition that the diversity of cultures, physically and psychically, will prevail and will always be either a source of conflict or a resource for the symbiotic enlightenment of global consciousness and conscience.

The option of justifying diversity as a legitimate excuse for conflict is proven to be a lie that can no longer be reasonably legitimized, whereas, the alternative of seeing diversity as a symbiotic opportunity for new awareness and reconciliation is legitimate; not just legitimate, but necessary if humankind would escape insanity and self destruction.

A transparent approach to diversity opens consciousness to the way of conflict resolution and the peaceable accommodation of conscionable pluralism. The accommodation of diverse “truth” socially obliges because it best serves communal wellbeing. [ President-Elect Barack Obama is a sign of the times, a promise of reconciliation, of hope that can give wings to spiritual authenticity. “Yes, We Can!” ]

RELIGIOUS
What is ‘Religious”? “Religious” is the culture of moral sensitivity in human relations based on personal conscience informed in all matters that pertain to universal wellbeing. On this fundamental premise, religious and civil consensus finds agreement and common ground for reconciliation.

From the view of history it is clear that the pretexts of many wars are “religiously” based, that is, based on conflicting ideologies of diverse cultural belief/ experience. Religion commonly identifies with bioregional/ cultural evolution and the institutionalized dogmas of faith derived from bioregional evolution/ experience.

Consensus evolutionary consciousness in life’s universal and common origins argues for new consensus understandings premised in universal knowledge (science) by which bioregional faith experiences/ differences can be reconciled.

The common ground of reason/ experience is now informed in universal consciousness/ conscience. Religions lose credibility and following when they cling to a culture of conflict based on premises of bioregional faith/ experience, and when they fail to pursue and secure the ground and goal of universal wellbeing commonly accessible through the integration/ reconciliation of new knowledge with bioregional diversity and past belief.

ECOLOGICAL
The dominant global moral issue for the foreseeable future is the radical degradation of the global environment/ ecology, essentially the consequence of dominion culture, i.e., bioregional exploitation and moral insensitivity.

All life is connected. Whether plant or animal, the “tree of life” grows, evolves, subject to the same genetic codes, texts and contexts, scripted in DNA sequencing. The implications of this reality are profound. Evolutionary iterations that yet prevail, and that will prevail into the future, are cosmic patterns now controlling/ guiding the evolving processes that secure organic complexity and sustain interdependent life-webs.

Human interventions, even over the timeframe of decades and centuries, are but ictus events in time against the timeframe of organic evolution; cavalier tampering with deep genetic coding puts humankind and the future sustainability of life on Earth at risk.

Human self arrogation, specifically, male self-identification with the Godhead, privileged with dominion suppositions, has proven to be a culture of disaster for Earth’s ecologic-zoologic system, and for humankind. What is needed is cultural humility, reverence for vital “humus”, the residue of spent life that is the organic ground and basis for vital transformation and sustainability.

The culture of consumerism presumes wrongly that the resources of Earth are unlimited and exist for human exploitation. The unbridled license of this presumption is fatal and leads inevitably to the implosion of human cultures and the extinctions of floral/ faunal networks upon which humankind depends totally, unqualifiedly.

ECONOMICAL
There is no new wealth on Earth except that which is reproduced by organic life. All life is sacred. All networks of life are sacred, whether of air, land or water. Life is the coinage of life. Global economics are essentially linked to the health and sustainability of life’s global networks, to webs developed within Earth’s atmospheres and geographies.

As is evident in these times, global environments and eco-systems are mortally stressed by mindless economic presumptions of corporate capitalism and by ecologic degradation from unbridled corporate profiteering, engineering and exploitation. The global economic crises presently enveloping global humanity is also a “religious” crisis which is precisely about the failure of moral relationships and conscionable sensitivity toward fragile Earth-life trashed by corporate capitalism devoid of conscience.

PERSONAL
Politics, religion, ecology and economy are part and parcel of the universal tapestry of self-reflective life which humans uniquely understand and dominate. The holistic security of life’s fabric depends on human ability to understand its intricacies of interdependence and to preserve its diversity even as humans enfold themselves more intimately within it. In the intimacy of implication, humans discover human/ divine connection and self-fulfillment. Self-fulfillment cannot happen except with sense and sensitivity for all other.

The future of Coming Church links intimately with us personally. Personal consciousness is individually diverse. Everyone perceives things from her/ his personal point of view. Viewpoints are necessarily personal and unavoidably unique. Differences should not be, however, flashpoints for conflict rather they should be starting points for symbiotic purpose, and opportunities to pursue reconciliation.

Personal grudges, ideological fixations, personal and institutional, are obstacles to personal/ social growth and wellbeing. A mind committed to reconciliation is rewarding to one’s own self as well as to others, but a mind trapped in past negative preoccupation is personally and socially hurtful. The social mind is shaped by how we personally relate to one another. Maturity is a lifelong quest in the acquisition of wisdom, age and grace.

The transformation of life is quintessentially a Eucharistic process, a process deeply dependent on/ from femininity, the ground-state of all vitality. Priesthood, service to life, is the work and wisdom of female conscience, the obligation of male subordination. Reconciliation begins with male recognition of subordination and universal correlation in the Sacrament of Natural Order.

Believe the words of St. Paul, “There are faith hope and love, and the greatest of these is Love” — the everlasting and only Absolute.

See: http://ncrcafe.org/node/2286, also
“THEOLOGY for the TIMES”, Additional Resource, at www.secondenlightenment.org

Vote Result --- Rating of 1:lowest and 10:highest for usefulness to community.
Score: 10.0, Votes: 4

The only way to reconcile

The only way to reconcile the Church is by sending the pedophiles to justice, including the Pope.

Not yet rated.

Fascinating idea, holding

Fascinating idea, holding people accountable for other people's actions, or are you saying the pope personally has had sexual encounters with children? What is the appropriate justice to be meted out to the pope?

Not yet rated.

SantaChingada, your

SantaChingada, your expectation and demand are under the circumstances reasonable, righteous and just. They are reasonable, righteous and just because a grave injury and public scandal have been and are being perpetrated on the public by Church hierarchy, complicitly enabled by the Pope. All you are asking and requiring, as I understand, are confession of guilt, compensation and true compunction on the part of wrongdoers.

What you ask is reasonable for the imbalance of public wrongdoing needs to be offset by public rightdoing. It is righteous because the tilt of public wrongdoing needs undoing in order to restore the balance of righteousness. It is just because conscionable equilibrium must be restored to disequilibrium if society is to continue the way communal wellbeing.

The Way of “Truth and Reconciliation” has been applied in South Africa and needs to be applied here. Moving forward is based on realizing that “I am in you as you are in me”. In other words, violence produces more violence; vengeance produces more vengeance. The challenge to communal wellbeing is how to stop the out-of-control downward spiral to greater societal disintegration.

“Vengeance belongs to God”. The guilty cannot escape divine vengeance or societal repercussion, except they seek reconciliation with a true heart. Not the bishops, nor the Pope, have met the requirements of truth and reconciliation.

The implosion of Church credibility will become ever more intense and destructive so long as the hierarchy clings to the arrogance of their self-righteous claim of dominion electionism and of collective inerrancy in matters of personal/ institutional faith/ morals.

The “Coming” of the CHURCH of RECONCILIATION will not be stopped notwithstanding clerical obstinacy and failure to reconcile their wrongdoing. If clerical wrongdoing is left unresolved, Church will be but a house of cards universally disrespected and disregarded.

That popes have been complicit in sheltering bishops (and rewarding them with new titles) is a scandal of perhaps even greater magnitude. Truth and righteousness are in actions not in sentiment or betrayed words. Nevertheless, the Way of Reconciliation must continue to be the Way of the future, the Way of Church Becoming. The People Church must move on and leave vengeance to God.

What is now all too evident is that the arrogant culture of patriarchal dominion has engendered a genetic myopia so deep that it is totally incapable of discerning truth from distortions of truth. Pray God that the Light of Truth penetrates hierarchical darkness.

Not yet rated.

Syvester, The Church has to

Syvester,

The Church has to become more irrelevant. It is cluttered with issues and objects accumulated over centuries, which are proving to be a distraction from its purpose. It would take an enormous amount of energy to get rid of the clutter and organize what is left. It is not worth the trouble. The best thing is for people to move on, taking only those things that are useful and necessary--the spiritual goods and knowledge. Those who are too attached to the Church will end up like Lot's wife. Will it take a meteor crashing into the Vatican to accomplish this, or is the scandal enough to get people over their sentimental attachments to things not relevant to God?

Not yet rated.

Marie, perhaps another way

Marie, perhaps another way of saying it is "the Church has to become more relevant". I understand what you are saying, I think, and I agree with you. A theology structured on cultured fixations of misinformation is certain to lose relevance in future times as old worldviews evolve with new knowledge.

Cultured institutions (Church) have enthralled themselves in representational sacrament and ritual reenactmments rather than in celebrating and revering Real Sacrament, i.e., Eucharistic Nature. The result is hyped cultural valuation of representational enactments and blindness to the cultural sacrilege of nature. Church becomes relevant by recognizing and celebrating Divine Presence in Nature and honoring Eucharistic Reality.

Reconciliation involves accommodating to truth by challenging outdated worldviews and fraudulent cultures, and adjusting to new knowledge by identifying the baggage of fixations that result directly from cultural misinformation, and cutting loose from it. In New Church, Nature has to be recognized and celebrated as the means of Grace, where humanity meets Divinity.

Not yet rated.

Maybe it will just take one

Maybe it will just take one bishop who allows his people to develop the kinds of parishes they feel best served by. Some of these parishes will be very progressive and some won't. Eventually the conservative ones, who essentially follow Trent, can have their own Catholic rite and all the Latin and limbo they can stomach.

The rest of us can begin Mass with a group sacrament of reconcilliation (to keep us temporarily pure enough to maintain a semblance of connection with Canon Law) and we can get on with our own kinder, gentler, more compassionate, more inclusive version.

http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com

Not yet rated.

colkoch, there was once a

colkoch, there was once a bishop that did just that. The result was a thriving diocese, where pastoral care reached the zenith of what it was intended to. But alas, one of the "faithful orthodox" in the diocese was offended by the pastorality and complained to the heirarchy. The bishop was "retired" and a new one, a "burkian" took his place. The thriving diocese was almost destroyed as a result. It still has not recovered, probably due in large part to the fact that the same bishop is still in charge.

Not yet rated.

It's amazing to me how many

It's amazing to me how many stories there are about the pastoral concern for the bleating 'one', and how that leads to the loss of at least 80 of the other 99.

Seems to me this could only result in a self selected flock of predatory sheep beating their terrified sheperds with their own croziers. Is this Benedict's definition of 'leaner and meaner'?

http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com

Not yet rated.

Could this be the Church of

Could this be the Church of the New Covenant (before it was imperialized - when the parousia was considered imminent and REAL.)

There is much to consider here. Thanks ... again ...

The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy

I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you... (Jn13:34)

Not yet rated.

Wow, this is awesome. A lot

Wow, this is awesome. A lot to think about here sylvester. Thanks.

http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com

Not yet rated.

Sylvester~There is too much

Sylvester~There is too much in your thread to digest at once. If productive I will come back. I probably won't get much past the title:"Coming Church of reconciliation". I commend you on your attitude of looking forward to formation of church ("Coming") as a positive quest rather than simply of disdain for the present and past(or as some would prefer protection at any cost).

I tend to think of "Church" as a coming together of people in respect and in acknowledgement and pursuit (not the best word) of ultimate reality. Differentiation evolves, or devolves from both presuppositions brought to the process and conclusions brought from the process.

Joseph Campbell's series:"The Many Faces of God" speaks not so much about "god" as it does about the commonalities intrinsic to our humanity, over the centuries and accross cultures which suggest that humanity shares or participates in a common psyche skeleton analogous to but as profound as our physical. I think that he also says that our projection of who or what god is is a reflection of our similarities as it is of our difference. In that sense and within my definition of religion, there is only one 'ultimate reality' or god and there is ultimately, one religion. It really does not matter that your 'face of god' differs from mine and/or mine from yours. The complexity of the ultimate reality (or the infinity of God) will never be exhausted so that pursuit of the many faces of god will only enhance the quest. Restricting or limiting the quest-ion(s) will only hamper and limit and obscure the benefits of the quest.

So, that sort of takes care of "Coming" & "Church". What does "Reconciliation" have to do with it? My school of thought places more priority on how we do things than on what we do. In this sense the church, the communal quest for the ultimate reality or God, is as much or more about how we do it than what. The what, or god is ineffable, infinite; the how is a)exploring God's image and likeness as (our) old catechism says quite clearly (If it has no validity why has our particular church insisted on imbedding this in its essence). b)The how is also acknowledging that god spoke, speaks, to us from god's perspective and is 'recorded' in the Torah, the New Testament the Koran, etc. as well as in our respective histories and traditions. c) Of extreme importance is the realization and acknowledgement that man also spoke and speaks to man inshrouded in these 'words of god'. Essential to the quest is the distingishing of where god is speaking and where man is speaking as distinct from and maybe even in opposition to god, discerning and parsing the differences and messages and the difficult humility of addressing these.

"C" above leads to the essential condition and maybe the pragmatic prime objective: we need to be humble enough to understand and accept that in order to see what it is that we need to see we must first learn how to open our eyes. Without this basic, even infantile dimension of 'reconciliation' a) that we are all in this mess together and b)we will only achieve our end if we accept that our 'bit' of truth will never exhaust god nor obscure the 'bit' of the other and c) dealing with the ineffable, the collection of our 'bits' is but a bit itself so that differences are or should be acknowledged and explored rather than being divisive.

Such a "reconciliation" does not lessen one's adherence to one's specific "face of God" it simply recongizes and accepts that it is held in good faith and whether it embodies a common lesson or word of god or not it is shared in respect of the other's right to hold it. It says that the community of sharing will never be violated by rejection.

Not yet rated.