Green Catholicism?
"...in summer 2007 the Arctic lost in a single week an area of ice almost twice the size of Britain." - John Simon, "The Moment of Truth - An Introduction", Monthly Review, July - August, 2008
The depth of the crisis can be measured by the depth of the response by Pope Benedict XVI. "In fact, environmentalism has emerged as perhaps the most distinctive new feature of Benedict XVI’s social teaching. Benedict touched upon the environment seven times during his July 12-21 trip to Australia, more often than he mentioned sexual abuse, the right to life, relativism, or any other social or cultural concern." - John L. Simon, "Catholic Environmentalism: Green teachings, initiatives take hold among Catholics worldwide", NCR, Aug. 8, 2008
The growing momentum of Catholic organizations toward ecological action cannot be doubted. But will voluntary efforts, no matter how sincere, be able to significantly impact the rapidly escalating crisis? First we need to uncover the true dimensions of that crisis.
James Hansen, the leading U.S. climatologist, wrote the following in an article on June 24, 2008 after his testimony to Congress on global warming, "Climate can reach points such that amplifying feedbacks spur large rapid changes. Arctic sea ice is a current example. Global warming initiated sea ice melt, exposing darker ocean that absorbs more sunlight, melting more ice. As a result, without any additional greenhouse gases, the Arctic soon will be ice-free in the summer. More ominous tipping points loom. West Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets are vulnerable to even small additional warming. These two-mile-thick behemoths respond slowly at first, but if disintegration gets well under way, it will become unstoppable. Debate among scientists is only about how much sea level would rise by a given date. In my opinion, if emissions follow a business-as-usual scenario, sea level rise of at least two meters is likely within a century. Hundreds of millions of people would become refugees, and no stable shoreline would be reestablished in any time frame that humanity can conceive...The tipping point for life on the planet will occur when so many interdependent species are lost that ecosystems collapse. The shocking conclusion, documented in a paper I have written with several of the world’s leading climate experts, is that the safe level of atmospheric carbon dioxide is no more than 350 ppm (parts per million), and it may be less. Carbon dioxide amount is already 385 ppm and rising about 2 ppm per year. Shocking corollary: the oft-stated goal to keep global warming less than two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) is a recipe for global disaster, not salvation." - James Hansen, "Twenty Years Later: Tipping Points Near on Global Warming", Huffington Post, June 24, 2008
The conclusion is inescapable: This ecological crisis could soon result in the deaths of hundreds of millions of our fellow human beings and the actions of our transnational corporations are directly responsible for it. What is equally inescapable is that depending on voluntary self-restraint cannot possibly meet the necessary goals for carbon reduction in the ten years we have left before the change becomes irreversible. In fact, we must ask "Can we make the necessary changes if the economic system that now rules the globe continues?"
Clearly, the crisis that has been caused by the massive economic forces brought into play by transnational corporations cannot be solved by planting trees. A systemic crisis requires a systemic response. James Hansen points to the culprits: "CEOs of fossil energy companies know what they are doing and are aware of long-term consequences of continued business as usual. In my opinion, these CEOs should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature. If their campaigns continue and 'succeed' in confusing the public, I anticipate testifying against relevant CEOs in future public trials." - James Hansen, "Twenty Years Later: Tipping Points Near on Global Warming", Huffington Post, June 24, 2008
Mr. Hansen blames these CEOs as if they were uniquely guilty, but they can no more break out of their economic preconceptions than can Mr. Hansen. Like them, he believes that the market must eventually correct this dire situation. These CEOs are simply acting as agents responsible to their stockholders, which is their legal obligation under the current economic system. That duty is to maximize the share value of their company. Share value can only be maximized by gaining the highest possible rate of return on the products their companies sell, which are based on fossil fuels. The more they promote the wide-spread use of fossil fuels, the higher the rate of return to their companies. The less they have to pay for carbon abatement programs, the more cash value will accrue to their bottom line. Therefore, their advantage will be achieved by pressuring governments to provide carbon credits for free or moving production to countries which do. Given the current economic crisis, pressurable countries will be lining up gladly to provide credits to transnational patrons.
The "bottom line" that dooms all such plans is the necessity of continued, rapid growth in production and profits by transnational corporations. Our economic system cannot be sustained without such growth, so no plan can be acceptable unless it factors in such growth as part of its underlying premise. The carbon credit trading scheme is popular with governments for precisely this reason and unworkable for that same reason. There can be no solution unless we are able to subordinate profit to the values of human and planetary survival. Only an economic philosophy far different than the one which produced the crisis can address this moment of truth for the earth and human civilization.
Our failure is a failure to see outside the system that has produced our economic "success." We wish desperately to cling to what is destroying our world and ourselves. Will a Christian leader with true vision arise to speak of the God of life who can extract us from the lies in which we are embedded?
When Benedict begins to
When Benedict begins to excommunicate international leaders of government and of business who fail to take appropriate action on the environement and our national bishops similarly excommunicate national leaders of govenement and of business noone should take their interventions in other policies seriously.
This is a well presented and credible presentation of the most serious issue of our time - the very survival of the human race and of this planet. More, the race's participation in the completion of creation was aborted once, symbolized by and in the story of Adam, Eve and the Garden. Christ not only forgives us for this fault but renewed and indeed raised our mission in creation into an unfathomable partnership with Himself. We can, maybe, be forgiven for not attending individually and collectively to our destructive process, as opposed to tending and completing creation...until now. We must confront the evil. the sin, the real 'intrinsic disorder' of creation's destruction and of its denyers.
One of the eminent religious orders, for example the Jesuits, Dominicans or Franciscans should be commissioned or adopt the environement in all of its dimensions as their total preoccupation for one hundred years. Fr. Thiallard deChardin, SJ should be appointed universal patron of the mission and laity invited to formally join the quest in an integral way. Fr. deChardin looked at science (knowledge, truth) comprehensively and within the context of passionate love and Love.
Your response is directly on
Your response is directly on target, Dennis. The main point of the post was that voluntary efforts, papal decrees, and governmental programs within the context of the current system are doomed. Why? Because they depend on the very system that caused the crisis in the first place to cure itself. Excommunications would certainly show that the bishops meant business, but even that would be insufficient. "According to James Lovelock, one of the world’s leading earth system scientists, if the global average temperature rise approaches 3˚C (relative to pre-industrial times) and the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) rises above 500 parts per million (ppm), both the world’s oceans and the rainforests will turn into net emitters of greenhouse gases. In that event, the global average temperature could rise further by up to 6˚C, making the greater part of the earth uninhabitable for human beings, raising the sea level by at least 25 meters, and causing the extinction of 90 percent of species and a possible reduction of the world population by 80 percent." Minqi Li, Monthly Review, July - August, 2008. Human survival is at stake. But unlike during the Great Flood, God is now asking humanity a direct question, "Will you take responsibility for the covenant I have made between you and all the creatures of the earth?" Or will you escape into religious fantasies? What is required is a total response. The mark of seriousness is that we face the possibility that the system which provides our current lifestyle is the source of the crisis. If we believe that we can preserve this system, then we still don't take the crisis seriously. Under this system, corporations and nation-states are highly pressured to expand production and accumulate capital on increasingly larger scales. This is not the result of abuse, but is fundamental to global capital. This system cannot be reconciled with ecological sanity. Changes in personal consumer behavior will have no significant impact. No technological miracles are likely. Efforts to convince CEOs of energy companies to behave rationally and morally ignore the coercive economic context in which these agents must act. They are bound to the valuation of their company's stock price which depends on growth in the use of fossil fuels. If you want to take a look at a serious critique go to http://nonviolentjesus.blogspot.com/2008/08/green-catholicism-examination-part-1.html.
Now I am for a green USA! I
Now I am for a green USA! I have been brought up in a very Republican family, although I will always wonder who my mother and father voted for when JFK ran for president! Being only 13 at the time I was truly enthralled with his thoughts and with his views on the world I being a Catholic young girl, knew right from the start that he wanted to make America a Stronger place to stop the Communistic Russian influence from overtaking our United States of America! He said that he believed in the Constitution! As green as it goes, I do believe in drilling for Oil in Alaska, while looking for alternatives like John McCain has been saying! Palin says that drilling in the Artic will NOT be bad for Americans. She has gotten out of office all of the poluters even though they may be Republican representatives! I believe that she will clean up our government which has been lagging in the moral compartment for too long! I do not believe in Barack Housein (the Blessed One) Obama because of his brokeness on the LIFE issues! I believe that in whatever God gives He gives and Man should NOT take away a life!
The people who will most
The people who will most benefit from drilling in Alaska are Alaskans. That 2000 dollar check each Alaskan got this year from state oil revenues will only get bigger. Multiply 2000 x 7 and the Palin's themselves derived more money from state oil revenues than most single mothers make in Newark. Apparently this isn't socialism or welfare. Palin would have to be a complete idiot not to be for more drilling in Alaska.
http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com
Barack Obama is not broken
Barack Obama is not broken on LIFE issues. He actually understands that it is not possible to outlaw the things we don't like. As a Republican environmentalist, do you believe it would be effective to just pass a law against carbon dioxide?
It appears that the last
It appears that the last days could be upon us and the evangelicals are still driving their SUVs with 'in case of rapture...' on their bumper. They are unaware of the aweful problem we have.
I agree CEOs of energy compnies could be tried for high crimes against humanity.
Not only the energy companies but also the utilities,the politicians and religion to a lessor extent. Care for the Earth was part of their job description-still hats off to Pope Benedict,Al Gore, Jimmy Carter,Mother Jones magazine.
If it is not too late already What can we do.
Here's what.
1] slow down to the most energy efficient speed on the highway.
2} Drive smaller cars
3] Allow bicycles on the interstate-make it safe
4} Adjust the thermostat up or down
5} Promote wind and solar
6] Promote geo-thermal
7] Car pool
8] change zoning laws so people can live close to wher they work.
9] Give the entire country a day off work to think about what individuals can do
10]Stop urban sprawl.
11]develop cars that use little energy
12]Use the railroads to move materials
13]Find a way to use down all nuclear waste
14]Set aside funds as rewards for inventions relating to energy
15]Harness the waves and tides
16]Grow vegetables at home
17]Broadcast every day tips on reduction of energy.
18]Give on tv and radio the daily oil import results.
19]Stop all Highway funding and change it to mass transport
20]Change to a four day week in every possible situation.
21]Demand more work from home.
22]Preach or pray for conservation every Sunday,
23]Dry clothes outside
24]make the home energy efficient
25]Develop an efficiency measuring system that can apply to all appliances
26]Hold government responsible for reducing
27]Make companies buy back vehicles that they made that are not efficient.
28]Make any legislation that is passed comply with energy policy.
29]yours to add on
Increase this list to at least double it curent size.
It may be already too late but games have been won in the last seconds with a 'Hail Mary' pass and it is the final seconds.
30] challenge status-quo
30] challenge status-quo thinking, initiate evolution/faith study in your parish, community
You are right that we are in
You are right that we are in the final seconds of this game. Unfortunately, I don't believe that voluntary action, as valuable as it might be, is sufficient to respond to this crisis. Voluntary action by individuals cannot be an effective response to a systemic crisis. Only a systemic response can be effective. This has to be an action by governments, churches, corporations and other large social organizations. And it cannot simply be a series of initiatives within the context of the current economic and political order, but it must accept fundamental changes in that order. The current economic order cannot cure the ecological crisis because it is the immediate cause of the crisis.
To continue: 30] Nascar
To continue:
30] Nascar needs to get involved and make part of their competition the conservation of fuel.
31] Lawn equipment needs to be more energy eficient and less polluting.
32] It may be cheaper for an electrc utility to provide solar panels to each household[ and buy back surplus energy]than to build nuclear plants.
33] Have every school teach a mandatory class on energy.
34] Tax every vehicle according to it's energy consumption. [4cyl,6 cyl and 8cyl]
35] Before any home is rented or sold have the energy efficiency of the hiome disclosed.
36] Develop the stop-start method in automobiles that is used in golf carts.
[Your's]
You might find this story
You might find this story helpful from the Aug. 8 issue of NCR:
Catholic Environmentalism: Green teachings, initiatives take hold among Catholics worldwide
Dennis Coday, NCR cafe management
Dear Nestacal, Whaaaaa? How
Dear Nestacal,
Whaaaaa?
How can a referral to additonal information not be a helpful post?
nestacal is right--the
nestacal is right--the article was already cited in the writing of brcoll







My posting here was actually
My posting here was actually a direct response to the article. All of the quotes from Pope Benedict are from that article.