A Moving Tale of Justice
I found this in this week's NCR.
Moving Cardinal Newman's body runs into controversy
by DENNIS CODAY
Published:
August 22, 2008
Cardinal John Henry NewmanThe Catholic churchâs attempt to exhume and quietly move the body of Cardinal John Henry Newman has run into controversy, with some saying Newmanâs dying wishes are being ignored.
Church officials plan to move Newmanâs remains from a grave in a small cemetery in the English town of Rednal to the Oratory church in the city of Birmingham where it will be transferred to a marble sarcophagus and can be venerated by pilgrims.
Newman wrote in his will that he wanted to be buried in the same grave as his longtime friend and spiritual companion, Fr. Ambrose St. John, whom Newman describes as the one great love of his life.
Newman was an Anglican priest who led the Oxford movement in the 1830s to draw Anglicans to their Catholic roots. He converted to Catholicism at the age of 44 after a succession of clashes with Anglican bishops made him a virtual outcast from the Church of England. He died in 1890.
Church officials say the Vatican Congregation for Saintsâ Causes wants Newmanâs body to be moved into a setting that befits his status as a potential saint. His beatification is expected to be announced later this year.
But British gay rights activist Peter Tatchell has described the removal âan act of religious desecration and moral vandalism.â
In an interview with Ecumenical News International, Tatchell said, âNewman repeatedly made it clear that he wanted to be buried next to his life-long partner, Ambrose St John. No one gave the pope permission to defy Newmanâs wishes.
âThe re-burial has only one aim in mind: to cover up Newmanâs homosexuality and to disavow his love for another man. It is an act of shameless dishonesty and personal betrayal by the gay-hating Catholic Church,â Tatchell said.
Ambrose St. JohnWhether Newman and St. Johnâs relationship was an actively sexual one has never been clear, but it was indisputably intimate.
After St Johnâs death in 1875, Newman wrote: âI have ever thought no bereavement was equal to that of a husbandâs or wifeâs, but I feel it difficult to believe that any can be greater, or anyoneâs sorrow greater than mine.â
St. John was also an Anglican priest who converted to Catholicism and joined Newman at the Oratory in Birmingham. (The Oratory of Saint Philip Neri is a congregation of Catholic priests and lay-brothers who live together in a community bound together by no formal vows but only with the bond of charity. Newman founded the Oratory in Birmingham in 1848.)
Their burial in the same grave was Newmanâs emphatic wish, expressed in a note he wrote July 23, 1876, to Fr. William Neville, his literary executor. The note reads: âI wish, with all my heart, to be buried in Fr. Ambrose St. Johnâs grave â and I give this my last, my imperative will.â
It is the same note in which he dictates what would become his motto: Ex umbris et imaginibus in veritatem (from shadows and images into truth).
The depth of Newmanâs and St. Johnâs relationship is detailed in scholarly work on âloving coupledom,â titled The Friend by Allen Bray (University of Chicago Press, 2003). The Friend was named book of the year in 2004 by History Today, and received an Award for Excellence from the American Academy of Religion.
One chapter of The Friend focuses on Newman and St. John. In it, Bray, a gay rights activist and respected British historian, explores the published works as well as memoirs, sermon notes and journals of Newman and his contemporaries. With this he reveals the intensity of Newmanâs feelings for St. John.
Newman was overwhelmed with grief at St. Johnâs death. He wrote: âThis is the greatest affliction I have had in my lifeâ and later: âa day does not pass without my having violent bursts of crying and they weaken me, I dread them.â
Newman dedicated his Apologia to St. John:
Bray concludes of Newman and St. John: âTheir bond was spiritual. ⊠Their love was not the less intense for being spiritual. Perhaps it was the more so.â
Burial with St. John was not Newmanâs only wish, according to Bray. He found in one of Newmanâs manuscripts a sketch of a grave site that shows âa-s-jâ buried below him and âeâ and âjospehâ on either side. At the actual site in Rednal, Newmanâs casket rests on St. Johnâs and between Edward Caswall and Joseph Gordon, two men who joined Newmanâs Oratory in its earliest days. All preceded him in death.
Bray then tells this story:
âNewmanâs room in the Oratory at Brimingham [is] exactly as Newman left it when he died in 1890. At the far side of the room is the altar where Newman (as a cardinal) said Mass, with the pictures of friends that he would remember at his Mass on the wall beside the altar. There one can see the pictures of Joseph Gordon, Ambrose St. John and Edward Caswall. These were as he put it, âThe three who from the first threw in their lot with me, from the moment they could do so.â â
Church Times, a London-based Anglican newspaper, is conducting an online poll, asking the question: âShould Cardinal Newmanâs remains be moved?â As this story was being posted the Church Timesâ poll was running 22 percent in favor of moving the body and 78 percent against.
You can vote in the poll here: http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/question.asp?id=61972.
(Dennis Coday is an NCR staff writer. His e-mail address is dcoday@ncronline.org.)
Poor Cardinal Newman----his
Poor Cardinal Newman----his body should be permitted to remain with that of Ambrose St. John. Again, this is another example of the 'politics' that are played by the Vatican---even when involving the life of a saintly person--who may become a canonized saint. People would visit Newman's tomb where it is now---they have been and would continue to do so.
Aquinas once wrote, "Friendship either finds or makes people equal." If Newman loved Ambrose St. John---then the chances are that, St. John, too, should be a saint e.g. of official church recognition. Wouldn't that be an earthshaking event? I'm sure that the official Church is well aware of this---so Cardinal Newman will "be moved into a setting that befits his status as a potential saint."
Meanwhile, the official Church ignores the love of two people who supported each other in the pursuit of holiness, in the Love of God and the love of others. What a pity!
Just one more piece of
Just one more piece of evidence to support the premise:
If the Vatican says it is right and good,
Then it probably isnt.
Cardinal John Henry Newman's
Cardinal John Henry Newman's remains should stay right where it is, where he desired his body to rest, next to his dear friend St. John.
The Church hierarchy is rather treating his body as if it were their property to do with as they wish? As they move pedophiles around, they also move bodies of dead saints around too? Have they nothing better to do with their time than move bodies around in an attempt to cover something up?
Is the attempt to unearth John Henry Newman's body and move it away from his dear friend a move to try to destroy the possibility of anyone thinking that this Saint could have loved another man in the deepest spiritual sense, but that they are looking at this from the standpoint of the flesh and not the heart?
Do they possibly think that they are protecting the faith by moving his grave away from his beloved? Might they see moving Newman's body as trying to obliterate the truth of the bond of love these two men had? Might they be jealous of that love? How awful, they might think, that pilgrims going to his grave might notice he was buried with another man at his own request, and make the connection that he might have been a homosexual? This seems the reason for wanting to move his body, so the faithful do not connect the dots as time goes on.
While digging up Newman's body, would the hierarchy also be trying to cover-up this great love between Newman and St. John? By moving Newman's body away from St. John, aren't they really trying to bury the semblance of love that truly existed in the Saints life?
If the Church hierarchy would do as Jesus in the Gospels teaches, would they find the time for this type of action to move dead bodies against the expressed desires of the deceased?
The more I think about this case of the hierarchy wanting to move Newman, it reminds me of how the Church hierarchy over the years has scripted the supposed truth by rearranging the truth in such a way as to totally distort the truth.
I think Peter Tatchell's
I think Peter Tatchell's comments make a point about how society tends to disrespect the deep emotional aspects of homosexual relationships while focusing only on the sexual. However, judging from Newman's own surprise at the depth of his grief, I don't think there is any reason to think that his relationship with Ambrose St. John was even openly affectionate, let alone romantic in its nature. This degree of grieving is entirely normal for all kinds of losses of companionship. I have seen it when people lose parents, other relatives or friends with whom they share the day to day, and even pets. That he requested to be buried with not only St. John, but with other members of his Oratory, should be part of our understanding of Newman as a saint, and for that reason, his body should be left in place.
Just rose to 83% ... the
Just rose to 83% ... the landslide is gaining momentum!
The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy
"Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, so I send you." (John 20:21)







John McCain says he will
John McCain says he will follow BinLaden to the gates of hell. And here's the church pursuing Newman to the gates of heaven to separate him from the man he loved.