National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

A Moving Tale of Justice

I found this in this week's NCR.

Moving Cardinal Newman's body runs into controversy

by DENNIS CODAY
Published:
August 22, 2008

Cardinal John Henry NewmanThe Catholic church’s attempt to exhume and quietly move the body of Cardinal John Henry Newman has run into controversy, with some saying Newman’s dying wishes are being ignored.

Church officials plan to move Newman’s remains from a grave in a small cemetery in the English town of Rednal to the Oratory church in the city of Birmingham where it will be transferred to a marble sarcophagus and can be venerated by pilgrims.

Newman wrote in his will that he wanted to be buried in the same grave as his longtime friend and spiritual companion, Fr. Ambrose St. John, whom Newman describes as the one great love of his life.

Newman was an Anglican priest who led the Oxford movement in the 1830s to draw Anglicans to their Catholic roots. He converted to Catholicism at the age of 44 after a succession of clashes with Anglican bishops made him a virtual outcast from the Church of England. He died in 1890.

Church officials say the Vatican Congregation for Saints’ Causes wants Newman’s body to be moved into a setting that befits his status as a potential saint. His beatification is expected to be announced later this year.

But British gay rights activist Peter Tatchell has described the removal “an act of religious desecration and moral vandalism.”

In an interview with Ecumenical News International, Tatchell said, “Newman repeatedly made it clear that he wanted to be buried next to his life-long partner, Ambrose St John. No one gave the pope permission to defy Newman’s wishes.

“The re-burial has only one aim in mind: to cover up Newman’s homosexuality and to disavow his love for another man. It is an act of shameless dishonesty and personal betrayal by the gay-hating Catholic Church,” Tatchell said.

Ambrose St. JohnWhether Newman and St. John’s relationship was an actively sexual one has never been clear, but it was indisputably intimate.

After St John’s death in 1875, Newman wrote: “I have ever thought no bereavement was equal to that of a husband’s or wife’s, but I feel it difficult to believe that any can be greater, or anyone’s sorrow greater than mine.”

St. John was also an Anglican priest who converted to Catholicism and joined Newman at the Oratory in Birmingham. (The Oratory of Saint Philip Neri is a congregation of Catholic priests and lay-brothers who live together in a community bound together by no formal vows but only with the bond of charity. Newman founded the Oratory in Birmingham in 1848.)

Their burial in the same grave was Newman’s emphatic wish, expressed in a note he wrote July 23, 1876, to Fr. William Neville, his literary executor. The note reads: “I wish, with all my heart, to be buried in Fr. Ambrose St. John’s grave – and I give this my last, my imperative will.”

It is the same note in which he dictates what would become his motto: Ex umbris et imaginibus in veritatem (from shadows and images into truth).

The depth of Newman’s and St. John’s relationship is detailed in scholarly work on “loving coupledom,” titled The Friend by Allen Bray (University of Chicago Press, 2003). The Friend was named book of the year in 2004 by History Today, and received an Award for Excellence from the American Academy of Religion.

One chapter of The Friend focuses on Newman and St. John. In it, Bray, a gay rights activist and respected British historian, explores the published works as well as memoirs, sermon notes and journals of Newman and his contemporaries. With this he reveals the intensity of Newman’s feelings for St. John.

Newman was overwhelmed with grief at St. John’s death. He wrote: “This is the greatest affliction I have had in my life” and later: “a day does not pass without my having violent bursts of crying and they weaken me, I dread them.”

Newman dedicated his Apologia to St. John:

Bray concludes of Newman and St. John: “Their bond was spiritual. 
 Their love was not the less intense for being spiritual. Perhaps it was the more so.”

Burial with St. John was not Newman’s only wish, according to Bray. He found in one of Newman’s manuscripts a sketch of a grave site that shows “a-s-j” buried below him and “e” and “jospeh” on either side. At the actual site in Rednal, Newman’s casket rests on St. John’s and between Edward Caswall and Joseph Gordon, two men who joined Newman’s Oratory in its earliest days. All preceded him in death.

Bray then tells this story:

“Newman’s room in the Oratory at Brimingham [is] exactly as Newman left it when he died in 1890. At the far side of the room is the altar where Newman (as a cardinal) said Mass, with the pictures of friends that he would remember at his Mass on the wall beside the altar. There one can see the pictures of Joseph Gordon, Ambrose St. John and Edward Caswall. These were as he put it, ‘The three who from the first threw in their lot with me, from the moment they could do so.’ “

Church Times, a London-based Anglican newspaper, is conducting an online poll, asking the question: “Should Cardinal Newman’s remains be moved?” As this story was being posted the Church Times‘ poll was running 22 percent in favor of moving the body and 78 percent against.

You can vote in the poll here: http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/question.asp?id=61972.

(Dennis Coday is an NCR staff writer. His e-mail address is dcoday@ncronline.org.)

Vote Result --- Rating of 1:lowest and 10:highest for usefulness to community.
Score: 10.0, Votes: 1

John McCain says he will

John McCain says he will follow BinLaden to the gates of hell. And here's the church pursuing Newman to the gates of heaven to separate him from the man he loved.

Rated 4 by 2 users. see individual ratings

Poor Cardinal Newman----his

Poor Cardinal Newman----his body should be permitted to remain with that of Ambrose St. John. Again, this is another example of the 'politics' that are played by the Vatican---even when involving the life of a saintly person--who may become a canonized saint. People would visit Newman's tomb where it is now---they have been and would continue to do so.

Aquinas once wrote, "Friendship either finds or makes people equal." If Newman loved Ambrose St. John---then the chances are that, St. John, too, should be a saint e.g. of official church recognition. Wouldn't that be an earthshaking event? I'm sure that the official Church is well aware of this---so Cardinal Newman will "be moved into a setting that befits his status as a potential saint."
Meanwhile, the official Church ignores the love of two people who supported each other in the pursuit of holiness, in the Love of God and the love of others. What a pity!

Rated 4 by 2 users. see individual ratings

Just one more piece of

Just one more piece of evidence to support the premise:

If the Vatican says it is right and good,
Then it probably isnt.

Rated 4 by one user. see individual ratings

Cardinal John Henry Newman's

Cardinal John Henry Newman's remains should stay right where it is, where he desired his body to rest, next to his dear friend St. John.

The Church hierarchy is rather treating his body as if it were their property to do with as they wish? As they move pedophiles around, they also move bodies of dead saints around too? Have they nothing better to do with their time than move bodies around in an attempt to cover something up?

Is the attempt to unearth John Henry Newman's body and move it away from his dear friend a move to try to destroy the possibility of anyone thinking that this Saint could have loved another man in the deepest spiritual sense, but that they are looking at this from the standpoint of the flesh and not the heart?

Do they possibly think that they are protecting the faith by moving his grave away from his beloved? Might they see moving Newman's body as trying to obliterate the truth of the bond of love these two men had? Might they be jealous of that love? How awful, they might think, that pilgrims going to his grave might notice he was buried with another man at his own request, and make the connection that he might have been a homosexual? This seems the reason for wanting to move his body, so the faithful do not connect the dots as time goes on.

While digging up Newman's body, would the hierarchy also be trying to cover-up this great love between Newman and St. John? By moving Newman's body away from St. John, aren't they really trying to bury the semblance of love that truly existed in the Saints life?

If the Church hierarchy would do as Jesus in the Gospels teaches, would they find the time for this type of action to move dead bodies against the expressed desires of the deceased?

The more I think about this case of the hierarchy wanting to move Newman, it reminds me of how the Church hierarchy over the years has scripted the supposed truth by rearranging the truth in such a way as to totally distort the truth.

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

I think Peter Tatchell's

I think Peter Tatchell's comments make a point about how society tends to disrespect the deep emotional aspects of homosexual relationships while focusing only on the sexual. However, judging from Newman's own surprise at the depth of his grief, I don't think there is any reason to think that his relationship with Ambrose St. John was even openly affectionate, let alone romantic in its nature. This degree of grieving is entirely normal for all kinds of losses of companionship. I have seen it when people lose parents, other relatives or friends with whom they share the day to day, and even pets. That he requested to be buried with not only St. John, but with other members of his Oratory, should be part of our understanding of Newman as a saint, and for that reason, his body should be left in place.

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

It is now 81% against

It is now 81% against

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

Just rose to 83% ... the

Just rose to 83% ... the landslide is gaining momentum!

The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy

"Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, so I send you." (John 20:21)

Rated 4 by 3 users. see individual ratings