How Do You Live on $7 an Hour?
Author Barbara Enrenreich wondered what is was like to live on $7 an hour after the 1996 welfare reform. Her bestseller Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting By in America describes her work as a waitress, cleaning lady, and a Wal Mart employee in different cities. Her book reminded me of John Howard Griffin, a white man who changed his skin color for six weeks in the early 1960s to find out what it was like a black person. His book Black Like Me was a sensation.
She had the advantages of being white, a native English speaker, good health and an automobile. In one word, it was brutal. People who think that it is easy being a waitress or performing other $7 an hour jobs have never done it.
Paying rent was the deal breaker that made it necessary to get two full time jobs to make ends meet. Low wage workers have no money to pay one month’s rent and a month’s deposit for an apartment. They pay weekly rates at an apartment or daily rates in a motel. The rich buy the convenient locations forcing the poor to rent more expensive, run down property far from work. When she worked in Key West, she found flophouses and trailer homes with neither air conditioning, screens, fans nor television going for $500 per month. She had a choice between getting a second job and living in her car. Coworkers packed three or four people into an efficiency or at most a one-bedroom apartment.
Expenditures for public housing have fallen since the 1980s and public rental subsidies stopped growing in the middle 1990s. On the other hand, the mortgage interest deduction subsidizes homeowners. The near poor are constrained by lack of mobility. They frequently have to depend on a relative to drop them off and pick them up on a route that includes a babysitter.
When you make $7 an hour, you leave your dignity and civil rights at the door. Until April 1998, there was no federally mandated right to bathroom breaks. Management reminds the employees that the break room is not a right and can be taken away. Employers have the right to search lockers and purses at will. Managers can sit for hours at a time but many feel that it is their duty to make sure that no one else does.
Personality questionnaires are designed to screen in docile people who are ready to snitch on coworkers. Although the test givers allege that there are no right answers, it is obvious what answer the employer wants to hear. Should a coworker observed stealing be forgiven or denounced? Do you agree or disagree with, “ Management is to blame when things go wrong”? Do you think that safety is the responsibility of the management?
There are many claims for drug testing, that it results in fewer accidents, fewer health insurance claims and increased productivity. A 1999 American Civil Liberties report shows that these claims are unsubstantiated. In fact, other studies show that drug testing lowers productivity, possibly because of lower morale.
Work at $7 an hour is a world of physical pain, cramps and arthritic attacks managed by Excedrin, Advil, cigarettes and for some, on the weekends, alcohol. Work as a cleaning lady and other jobs are brutally repetitive, physically demanding and even damaging.
Assistance for the working poor is hard to obtain. Barbara called one of the charitable agencies when she needed money to buy food. On her first call, she was on hold for four minutes until someone picked up. Then she mad four more calls until a helpful person told her how to get a food voucher. The food available through the voucher was limited. There were no fresh vegetables or fruit, no chicken nor cheese. In seventy minutes of calling and driving, she acquired $7.02 worth of food, less $2.80 for telephone calls.
Employers of low wage workers frequently make their employees work without pay. As a cleaning lady, the company required employees to get to work by 7:30 but they did not start getting paid until about 8:00. Employees did not get paid the half hour at the end of the day sorting out dirty rags and refilling cleaning fluid bottles.
The driving force of the 1996 welfare reform was that a job was the way out of poverty. All the state had to do was provide training for some social and technical skills, then make people go out and get a job. The legislation had no provision for monitoring post welfare economic condition of former recipients. The media have paid attention to occasional successes, proclaimed them to be universal and ignored increased hunger.
The lives of the near poor are not seen on television. In the drama and comedies, you see policemen, schoolteachers, and other professionals. It is easy for the near poor to see themselves as the odd persons out and not get the idea that society is giving them a raw deal. Since the near poor live in different neighborhoods, socialize in different places, it is easy to think that they do not exist.
It turns out that no job is truly unskilled. All the low wage jobs that Barbara got required concentration, a mastery of new terms, new tools and skills from the restaurant computer screen to working a backpack vacuum cleaner. The near poor are not lazy. They find few or no rewards for heroic performance. The challenge is to budget your energy to have some left at the end of the day.
What can society do to remedy this gruesome situation? Encouragement of labor union activity, enforcement of existing labor and immigration law would have some effect. It may be easier to raise the minimum wage, provide national health insurance not linked to employment and subsidize low-income housing.
Barbara Ehrenreich, Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting By in America, Metropolitan Press, 2001, 224 pages.
Anyone who would work for $7
Anyone who would work for $7 an hour if they could get welfare could be considered unwise or maybe super patriotic. I don't know which.
Provide national health
Provide national health insurance.In the past few years we decimated the increases in salaries by trying to provide a decreasing health insurance policy. The premiums for a policy has to be spread over the entire economy not coming only from salary. The hedge fund manager is not likely to effect the health care budget by his premium. It has to be a combination of sales tax- luxury tax,premium from employer and deductibles from the individual.
How long can we use the forty hour week as the full time employment standard when most middle mgmt people are working 60 hrs and yet benefits are not extended to those who are guardedly kept under thirty hours out of fear of having to pay benefits. Those companies are the ones we are subsidising.
In any media coverage of companies there several things that get attention;
1] Gross sales and if they are increasing.
2] sales outlets increasing or decreasing
3] making the CEO look good
4] stock price
Whether the company is a leech or a benefactor to the community is not important to the media [are they media or are they processors of the fodder that their publicity people churn out]
If he church would listen to
If he church would listen to the encyclical of Leo xiii. If the church would wake up and smell the workplace. If the church listened to Dorothy Day,the original Mother Jones, Union Leaders and the homeless there would be no one earning seven dollars an hour. A bishop at Vat 2 said that it would be easier to find jewels in a dung heap than find virtue in poverty. There are few catholics earning seven dollars an hour attending Mass. On the other side of the coin there are college graduates earning 9 and 10 dollars an hour [they replaced the twelve dollars an hour college graduates that were fired in order to make budget]
To remedy this "gruesome
To remedy this "gruesome situation" which it truly is, would be to raise the minimum wage, provide national health insurance and to subsidize low-income housing. Also, they should be paid for the total amount of time they are working for the employer and not have to work extra time for $0.00. That should be enforced and states should have hotlines for people to call against employers who are not paying them for all of the hours they are working. The employer should be penalized if not paying for all of the hours worked and should be required to pay all back pay with interest.
The other things we can do as a society and as individuals who care for others in need is to donate to local food banks and charities, donate clothing and other household items for these working poor.
Barbars Ehrenreich's book
Barbars Ehrenreich's book should be a must read for anyone who thinks it's easy to get by in a low income job without some form subsidy.
My daughter is finally on her feet, but only because I subisdized her for her first two years out of college, paid the deposit on her apartment, bought her her car, and paid the insurance for it, while her dad maintained her health insurance. That's a lot of subsidy and she is perfectly aware of this fact by comparing her situation with her fellow co workers.
She was also astute enough to understand that by subsidizing her to this extent, we were subsidizing the very companies that made this necessary. Nice catch 22.
http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com
Colkoch, my son has been out
Colkoch, my son has been out of college for over a year and we are subsidizing him until he can get on his feet. He's taken a low paying job in a warehouse full time just to get medical benefits and pay off his student loans because after a certain age they no longer qualify to be on their parents medical insurance policy.
There is no full time work in his field that he studied for in college and there is a wave of grads that just came out of the schools with the same degree. He has learned from the interview process that there is more to getting a job than having a degree. First, if you don't have friends in high places you are out of luck and if you are not a minority in some cases you are out of luck and if the economy is stagnant or regressive in hiring practices and money is tightening up you are out of luck. He has student loans to pay off and there is just no way he can afford to get his own place. Housing is just too expensive. It's just out of the question. He'd have to live in his car or a tent somewhere if he did not have parents to help him out. Believe me, if we could have afforded to pay for his college we would have, but we have been trying to keep our heads above water for years in this economy too.
Parents are in most cases the big subsidies bailing out our young. There is no tax write-off for parents of children after a certain age but we still have to support them and they are still our dependents. Certain tax laws should probably change to reflect a child who is now an adult still living at home, as well medical insurance carriers should extend the age for coverage for dependents to at least the age of 30, or better still we should have a universal health care program subsidized by taxes that currently go toward military spending and redirect it to a medical fund so all have medical coverage.
Another idea would be no taxes taken out at all for those making a low hourly amount, and/or a much smaller percentage taken out in relation to their pay. My son complained that $100 was taken out of his weekly pay and realized that was $400 a month of his income taken out. What does he get for that money taken out? There is no investment in the future or in the maintenance or rebuilding of the infrastructure. There is military spending and the bailing out of bad investment banks in billions, from private investment to public debt like Milton Friedman's program. He is astute enough like your daughter to know who is subsidizing whom. At the end of the year he will probably get most of the taxes back. So, why take it out in the first place? In a sense, if he is going to get a big portion of it back from the federal tax he is giving his money to the feds with no interest gained. Wouldn't it be better for the young folks if they could take some of that money and pay off their student loans or save some of it for a nest egg for themselves, for housing? On the other hand, if he doesn't or can't pay back the student loans, what money he earns will be garnished from his pay. Nice. What a system. Keep them in a hole, a deeper one. Education should not be so expensive and here too a portion from military spending and eliminating pork barrel spending should go towards educational subsidies.
I really feel sorry for those young who were forced out of their homes by unloving or tyrannical parents, or abusive parents. They have a much more difficult burden to carry. People in this category really need help and guidance and subsidies that their families did not provide or could not provide for reasons perhaps beyond their control, or because of the downturn in the economy that forced their parents out of work and out of their home. Some young are turning in desperation to the sex trades to earn money, especially those with children to support. In a real sense, they sacrifice their own souls for the sake of their children to have a roof over their head and not live in poverty in the streets. The sex industry thrives in an economy such as the current system. Many people fall through the cracks of a decaying system. Women who dance around half naked for big bucks rationalize they have no other choice and in a real sense, they don't have another choice, unless of course they want to see themselves living on the streets with their children and exposing them to far worse dangers. They don't want to earn $7 an hour and have nothing to show for it at the end of the day except sore feet and a bad back.
We just can't ignore the problem of low wages and imagine that we are not all going to be adversely affected by their circumstances of low pay, no medical and not enough money to even keep a roof over their head, to barely subsists on their own, let alone support children if they have any. In a real sense, we drive people to despair by not helping them out and giving them some real hope for a better life.
We need to bring good paying jobs back to the US and create new jobs for the immediate future, provide medical care, for our children, for people reaching retirement age that have been let go due to US companies leaving the country for cheaper labor and now they no longer have income or medical insurance. Older people are facing what younger people are facing, but our parents aren't with us any longer to subsidize us. That's another subject. I've said enough for now.







Let's go back to the media.
Let's go back to the media. I'm surprised that no one else picked up on this. The Media is the big problem. Companies and CEO's of companies are in the news every day and why? The media investigates almost nothing that comes from the boardroom. The board dishes it out-the media writes it up and the public eats it up. Mr Trump is news-huh? General Motors releases a new SUV-huh? XYZ company has a record profit. How many companies are raiding every country that they can- all to increase the bottomn line. From the labor side of the story nothing. Benefits are reduced to increase the bottomn line but the press closes it's eyes. From the time of Ronald Reagan labor has always been wrong. [The man competes very well with Geo Bush for the title of worst president- but he's still a darling of the media] Other than this paper what other outlet is really into investigating?