WYD: World Youth Day's evolution from Chaucer to 'Evangelical Pilgrimage'
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
In the media and popular culture, World Youth Day is often dubbed the “Catholic Woodstock,” or the “Olympic Games” of world religion. Among Catholic insiders, however, the preferred argot is “pilgrimage,” and the youth who take part are described as “pilgrims.”
Yet if Geoffrey Chaucer somehow were to drop in on Sydney, Australia, this week, it’s not at all clear he would be reminded of the kind of spiritual journey he described in The Canterbury Tales.
That disorientation would not simply be the result of modern means of transportation, lodging and communication utterly inconceivable to the Wife of Bath. It’s also because the nature of World Youth Day has evolved over its three decades, moving away from the traditional understanding of what it means to be a pilgrim, classically captured in Chaucer's work, towards a new model that merits a new term: “Evangelical Pilgrimage.”
Traditionally, a pilgrimage has been understood as a journey that takes one progressively away from “the world,” towards a famed spiritual center – Lourdes, for example, or the Holy Land, or, as in Chaucer's case, Canterbury. That’s the sense in which people today still refer to a pilgrimage to Medjugorje, or to San Giovanni Rotondo, the principal shrine of Padre Pio in southern Italy.
In the beginning, World Youth Days were conceived as pilgrimages in this classic sense. The 1989 edition, for example, was held in Santiago de Compostela in Spain, and in 1991 Catholic youth converged upon the famed Polish shrine of the Black Madonna in Częstochowa. Both have been traditional pilgrimage destinations for centuries.
Along the way, however, something unexpected happened. Turnout exceeded even high-end estimates, and the youthful passion of the pilgrims elicited strong media interest. As a result, World Youth Day went from being largely an inner-Catholic affair to a "happening" that captured the imagination of the broader culture.
In the wake of those experiences, church officials began to grasp that the value of World Youth Day lies not only in the spiritual formation it offers to young people, but also the evangelical witness those young people offer to the world.
One could date the emergence of World Youth Day as a model of "Evangelical Pilgrimage" to 1993. In that year, the event was held in Denver, Colorado, hardly anyone’s idea of a traditional pilgrimage center. In the years since, World Youth Days have been held in such disparate locales as Paris, Toronto, Cologne, and now Sydney. Some might be considered traditional pilgrimage destinations and some not, but that’s no longer the common term.
Rather, sites now seem to be chosen for World Youth Days not because they’re seen as reservoirs of spiritual energy, but rather because they’re suffering from spiritual drought. In other words, the aim is not to escape secularism, but rather to challenge it on its home turf.
By all accounts, Denver was the key to this paradigm shift. Prior to the event, staging World Youth Day in a city without a strong Catholic culture, and with a strongly secular ethos, was considered an enormous gamble. Behind the scenes, organizers and Vatican officials worried about low turnout and public indifference.
In the end, the event was perceived as a huge success that energized the local church.
“Looking back, the church in northern Colorado is dramatically different” because of what happened at World Youth Day, Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver said in 2002. Among other things, Chaput said that Denver’s two seminaries were “literally running out of room for candidates,” one expression of a renewal that he traced to 1993.
Moreover, the Denver World Youth Day also generated an avalanche of positive PR for the church, protecting a vigorous image in a culture more accustomed to thinking of institutional religion as gradually slouching towards oblivion.
The 2002 version of World Youth Day in Toronto, another massively secular locale, largely replicated this success, once again offering an image of Catholicism as youthful and alive.
These days, the relevant question in picking a location no longer seems to be which site World Youth Day most needs, but rather which site most needs a World Youth Day.
During the last three years of preparation for the Sydney edition, this has been the constant drumbeat from Cardinal George Pell: Australia, as one of the world’s most secularized societies, desperately needs World Youth Day to provide a new burst of energy and to showcase the dynamism of the church.
That’s what it means to call World Youth Day an “Evangelical Pilgrimage.” Today, the focus is not merely, or even primarily, upon the inner spiritual experience of the participants, as important as that is, but rather upon the public impact of the event – its capacity to stoke the embers of the faith, to rouse a secular world from its dogmatic slumber … in a word, to evangelize.
Though the official announcement of the site for the next World Youth Day will not be made until Sunday, sources tell NCR that it’s likely to move back to Europe, this time in Madrid, Spain.
If so, that choice would certainly fit the pattern. Not only does Madrid reflect the broadly secularizing currents of Western culture, but it is also the front line of the “culture wars” in today’s Europe under the Socialist government of Prime Minister JosĂ© Luis RodrĂguez Zapatero. In some ways the church in Spain these days perceives itself as under siege, and no doubt officials see a World Youth Day as a powerful way of pushing back.
It remains to be seen, of course, whether this week’s event in Sydney will offer the evangelical stimulus for which Pell and others are hoping. Nevertheless, the captivating imagery of Pope Benedict XVI making his entrance on a cruise ship into Sydney Harbor, surrounded by pumped-up young people from the four corners of the earth, has already given the Catholic church in Australia one of its biggest and best PR days in recent memory.
In a nutshell, that’s what Evangelical Pilgrimage is all about.
As a Catholic feminist, I am
As a Catholic feminist, I am no great fan of our current St Peter in residence.
When it comes to the WYD, I have mixed emotions. I find colkoch's assessment of the next WYD remarkably lucid and I am thankful for the insight. On the other hand, I cannot help see in those 'evangelical Woodstock' replicas of the Sermon on the Mount, in the sense that the energy of thousands of people gathered in a search of Godde has to impact some of the participants.
Today's Gospel (Mt 13:24-43) where the master tells his slaves, "No, if you pull up the weeds you might uproot the wheat along with them" fits well, it seems to me, with what goes on in the RCC today: good and bad come as a pair, as they have always done. The Spirit seems to be moving Benedict in ways She might not move you or me. But the Spirit is there and we have to let it all be played out.
I am happy to hear, however, that some protesters did pass another message that did need to be heard. Rumor was that they would not be allowed to and would have to pay a heavy fine if trying to do so. The Australian authorities did know better :-)))
http://acatholicwomansplace.blogspot.com
Mr. Allen, I'll ask you
Mr. Allen,
I'll ask you again: what exactly do you mean by "evangelical Catholics" and, now, "evangelical pilgrimage"? You say that the impact is no longer on the interiority of the event, but on its public impact.
I hope you're giving serious consideration to your use of the term "evangelical." Because evangelical Protestants have been in the forefront of incorporating secularity into their evangelism. The way in which they decide what the Gospel message is, their presentation of the Gospel message, the outcome they see in embracing the Gospel message are all dependent on modernity, on secularism.
This is in contrast to the WYD, even if its outward manifestation is redolent of Woodstock or other public gatherings. Benedict XVI's call a public witness to the Catholic faith is only what ordinary Catholics did, in pre-Vatican II days, to address the malevolent secularity of socialism (communism, if you prefer). This may have been addressed in different ways, e.g., through attendance at Mass, public processions on holy days and saints' days, passing out Catholic literature, etc., but it was still a public manifestation of the faith. Many of these events were themselves "massive." And no one thought to call them "evangelical."
Although pedants will say that "evangelical" derives from "evangel," etc., it is disingenous to pretend that this word does not have specific connotations in the USA. The word "evangelical" is a place-holder for a particular reading of the Bible and a particular set of doctrines.
Why don't you just call the manifestation of WYD or the recurrent enthusiasm for orthodoxy "Catholic?" Because that's what it is. It is not "affirmative orthodoxy," or "evangelical Catholicism." It is Catholicism. Whether or not it includes every single dissident group is not the point. "Catholicism" is bringing back an appreciation for the ecclesiastical tradition as another way of articulating Revelation, a way that has been dismissed for nearly 50 years. It is not simply "getting down to the essentials," which both liberal and neo-conservative Catholics desire (for different reasons). Both, in the recent past, decided that the ecclesiastical tradition was of little or no value and both push inculturation as the prime method of evangelizing. And evangelical Protestantism is characterized by "getting down to the essentials" and inculturation.
What Benedict XVI has proposed is very different and the enthusiasm for his programme illustrates that doctrinal talking points were not enough; that the Church itself has a history, which must be included as part of God's move through history. God has attached Himself to us in that very history and this is what Benedict XVI is reviving. And it always included a public witness to the faith. This is nothing new and it's certainly not "evangelical."
Whoa, there, Catnip!
Whoa, there, Catnip! There's nothing wrong with trying to take back the word "evangelical" so it doesn't just refer to a particularly zealous brand of Protestantism. You're right that many Catholics have involved themselves in massive movements to fight various aspects of acculturation, like fighting communist infiltration of labor unions then and fighting a "culture of death" now. Not all of those activities were or are directly related to proclaiming the good news or sending out those who will. WYD is very much aimed at getting the gospel out where it doesn't get heard often. "Evangelical" is a very appropriate term, and if it's getting tarnished by Protestants, why shouldn't Catholics take the word back and polish it to its original shine?
John Allen is right on, once
John Allen is right on, once again. A beautiful column.
John, you can dress this up
John, you can dress this up anyway you want (Evangelical Pilgrimage) but WYD is now a huge PR event whose original purpose has been distorted. Should Madrid be the next choice for WYD it becomes even more distorted. It becomes in a very real sense a weapon the Church will use against the Spanish government.
I don't remember any gospel story in which Christ USED the faith of his disciples in this purposeful and utilitarian a manner.
Please note this: http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com
If the screwdriver you
If the screwdriver you picked up turns out to be a hammer, why not use it as a hammer? WYD hasn't changed its original purpose, the bishops are just discovering what the purpose really was.
I think you're wrong about what Jesus did. He sent out the twelve, and the seventy, and eventually told his disciples to go into all the world and preach the gospel. He even told them quite a few would die for it. That's pretty cold-blooded, from the world's way of looking at it. And a great many governments since then have learned to fear waves of missionaries, for good reason. They deserve to get hammered, and sometimes they do.
I agree with you Crazy
I agree with you Crazy Diamond that Jesus's act in sending the disciples out into the world could in one sense be percieved as cold blooded. I think the difference is He never had them purposely tweak the Roman powers in an orchestrated mass gathering. All of His mass gatherings were spontaneous. Now it apparently takes us three full years of planning and 140 million tax dollars from the secular societies we wish to tweak. Maybe that's a miracle in itself. :)
http://enlightenedcatholicism-colkoch.blogspot.com









Catnip oversimplifies.
Catnip oversimplifies. "Evangelical" is not a word with a single, clearly defined meaning. On the contrary, it has many shades of meaning, several of them conflicting with one another. The argument is not over, and maybe never will be.
John Allen is to be congratulated on spelling out why he has chosen to use the term and what exactly he is using it to mean.