WYD: Once again, papal flight features talk of abuse crisis
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Denver
For the second time in a row, Benedict XVI has opened a papal trip by tackling the issue of sexual abuse in comments to reporters aboard the papal plane.
In April, Benedict responded to a question from NCR during his flight to Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington, D.C., by saying that he is âdeeply ashamedâ by the sex abuse scandals, stressing that pedophiles must be âabsolutely excludedâ from the priesthood, and vowing that the church will strive to bring âjustice and healingâ to victims.
Today en route to Australia for the opening of World Youth Day, the pope once again took a question about the sex abuse crisis. As with the flight to America, the pope spoke in English.
"The problem is essentially the same as in the United States," the pope said. "I felt obliged to speak about it in the United States because it is essential for the Church to reconcile, to prevent, to help and also to see guilt in these problems, so I will essentially say the same things as I said in America."
"As I said, we have three dimensions to clarify: the first, I mention, is our moral teaching. It must be clear, it was always clear from the first centuries that priesthood, to be a priest, is incompatible with this behavior, because the priest is in the service of Our Lord, and Our Lord is holiness in person, and always teaching us â the Church has always insisted on this. We have to reflect on what was insufficient in our education, in our teaching in recent decades. There was, in the 50s, 60s and 70s, the idea of proportionalism in ethics: it held that nothing is bad in itself, but only in proportion to others. With proportionalism, it was possible to think for some subjects â one could also be paedophilia â that in some proportion they could be a good thing. Now, it must be stated clearly, this was never Catholic doctrine. There are things which are always bad, and paedophilia is always bad."
"In our education, in the seminaries, in our permanent formation of the priests, we have to help priests to really be close to Christ, to learn from Christ, and so to be helpers, and not adversaries of our fellow human beings, of our Christians. So, we will do everything possible to clarify what is the teaching of the Church and help in the education and in the preparation of priests, in permanent formation, and we will do all possible to heal and to reconcile the victims. I think this is the essential content of what the word âapologizeâ says."
"I think it is better, more important to give the content of the formula, and I think the content has to say what was insufficient in our behavior, what we must do in this moment, how we can prevent and how we all can heal and reconcile."
The Vatican has not announced whether the pope will meet with victims of sexual abuse while in Australia. In Washington, Benedict met with five victims in a private encounter in the residence of the Apostolic Nuncio, or ambassador, to the United States.
Auxiliary Bishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, the chief organizer of World Youth day, told reporters that if a meeting were to take place, "I expect it would be like in the United States, very private."
The Catholic church in Australia has been repeatedly rocked by sexual abuse scandals in recent decades.
In just the law few days, those wounds have been reopened by reports that Cardinal George Pell of Sydney, the official host of World Youth Day, was aware of credible accusations against an abuser-priest named Fr. Terrence Goodall in 2002, but failed to take action against him. Some have also charged Pell with dishonesty in his handling of the case.
In 2005, Goodall was convicted of indecent assault against the victim who complained to Pell in 2002. Just days before the popeâs arrival in Australia, wiretaps were played on national television in which Goodall admitted to the victim that their sexual encounter was not consensual.
That revelation has been especially damaging to Pell in light of a letter he sent to the victim in February 2003 in which he wrote that the encounter may have been a matter of âhomosexual behavior between two consenting adults.â
In a further embarrassment, Pell stated in the same letter that he was not aware of any other allegations against Goodall, yet the Australian Broadcasting Corporation unearthed another letter from Pell, dated the same day, referring to a report that Goodall had sexually abused an 11-year-old altar boy.
Given that context, Benedictâs comments on the sexual abuse crisis are likely to be carefully scrutinized by the Australian press and public.
John, It looks like Cdl Pell
John,
It looks like Cdl Pell may be innocent in the matter of the letter to the abuse victim. While the letter was poorly written, it does seem possible that Cdl Pell might have made an innocent mistake when writing it.
In the letter to the abuse victim, Cdl Pell wrote
[1:] After examining all of the material, Mr Murray provided me with a report, and he has recommended that the allegations of inappropriate behaviour against you be found to be substantiated. [2:] However, as no other complaint of attempted sexual assault has been received against Father Goodall and he categorically denies the accusation, [3:] Mr Murray was of the opinion that the complaint of attempted aggravated sexual assault cannot be considered to have been substantiated.
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2297016.htm
It looks like
[1:] Accepts the allegation of inappropriate behaviour (relatively minor).
[2:] Cdl Pell may have meant to say "attempted rape" (which was another allegation the victim made but was apparantly never substantiated in court).
[3:] Was an innocent mistake referring to the rape allegation (Murray actually said the opposite but Pell did not agree. It looks like Pell was right as apparantly the rape allegation was not later substantiated).
Would be grateful if you could look into this and correct.
God Bless you and all your good work for the faith









Thanks Chris. Cdl. Pell's
Thanks Chris.
Cdl. Pell's statement can be found here:
http://www.sydney.catholic.org.au/Archbishop/Addresses/200878_754.shtml
He writes:
> "I should preface my remarks by pointing out that I have a good record in dealing with sexual misbehaviour and was the first to set up diocesan protocols in Melbourne in 1996.
> "There was no cover-up: The accusations against Father Goodall were investigated by the Church and the police, and Father Goodall was stood down. Church authorities fully cooperated at every stage."
Common sense would seem to tell us that for the Cardinal who has had a good record of dealing with this and has shown initiative, it would not make sense and would be out of his character to cover up a single case some seven years after his ongoing initiative. Added to this is the fact that he has been forthcoming in the exercising of his Episcopal authority, unlike some of the Bishops in America involved in the scandal. He has no history of cover-ups as do these bishops.
Obviously this 2003 allegation was resurfaced at this time to coincide with the very public WYD event in 2008 in order to damage the credibility of the Cardinal and the Church. Such malevolence is usually not concerned with the truth of the situation.
Given these, it would seem to me that on historical, doctrinal and moral basis pertaining to Cdl Pell, accusations against him are unsubstantiated.