USCCB: Bishops vote to tighten rules on artificial nutrition and hydration
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Orlando, Florida
In effect, the U.S. bishops voted today to amend their directives on Catholic health care to make clear that providing artificial nutrition and hydration to patients in a persistent vegetative state, as well as other debilitating conditions, is generally obligatory.
Technically, this morningâs vote simply authorized the Committee on Doctrine to begin work on revisions to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, the primary document governing the operation of Catholic hospitals and health care facilities in the United States.
In reality, however, itâs clear that Committee on Doctrine intends to reflect the content of two recent Vatican statements on the issue of providing food and water: a March 2004 address by Pope John Paul, and an August 2007 document from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in response to questions posed by the U.S. bishops.
The latter text asserted that providing food and water, even by artificial means, is âan ordinary and proportionate means of preserving lifeâ and is therefore generally âobligatory.â
The subject of artificial nutrition and hydration has been deeply controversial in Catholic circles in recent years, with some moral theologians arguing that the withdrawal of food and water from patients in a persistent vegetative state can be justified on the basis of the long-standing distinction between âordinaryâ and âextraordinaryâ means.
In some cases, these ethicists have argued, keeping a patient alive indefinitely, without realistic hope of recovery, amounts to an extraordinary measure and thus may be discontinued. Critics of that view argue that it amounts to a violation of human dignity, treating certain lives as no longer worth defending.
The drift of the two recent Vatican statements, however, is that unless food and water can no longer be assimilated by a patient, or the provision of food and water is causing serious physical difficulty such as chronic infections, it is an obligatory aspect of routine care.
Sources say that is likely to be the effect of the revisions to the Ethical and Religious Directives, which Lori said could be ready for a vote by the bishops as early as next November.
Cardinal Justin Rigali of Philadelphia, chair of the bishopsâ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, and Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, chair of the Committee on Doctrine, recently published an article in Health Progress, a publication of the Catholic Health Association, on the subject of artificial nutrition and hydration.
Rigali and Lori suggested that the recent Vatican statements on the obligation to provide food and water apply more broadly, beyond cases of a persistent vegetative state. They cited, for example, quadriplegia, mental illness or Alzheimerâs diseases â cases of what they called âchronic but stable debilitating conditions.â
Lori told the bishops this morning that the Committee of Doctrine intends to consult with Dr. John Hass of the National Catholic Bioethics Center as well as the Catholic Health Association in preparing its revisions.
Speaking from the floor, Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk urged Lori to consult as widely as possible â not so much because the content of the revisions is in doubt, but for what he called the âpoliticalâ objective of making it go down easier.
âWe do not want it to seem that weâre handing this down from on high, and that people havenât had their say,â Pilarczyk said.
âThe issue is reasonably clear, but we will do ourselves favor if we have as much input as we can possibly get for reasons of acceptability and making the final product that much more âreceivable,ââ he said.
Lori said that was âgood advice and well-taken.â
Lori also noted that the Vatican is currently working on a successor document to Donum Vitae, a lengthy text on a variety of bioethical issues. Among other things, the new document is expected to deal with artificial nutrition and hydration.
Rather than waiting for that document to appear, however, Lori said his committee felt it's important to offer "up-to-date and authoritative guidance in the here-and-now."
Outrageous! No one is
Outrageous!
No one is morally bound to take extra-ordinary means to preserve life unduly--and tube feeding is NOT ordinary!
Do these guys believe in life-hereafter or not?
Love, John
my website: Sacred Quest at www.torchlake.com/poetman
What happened to the
What happened to the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary means based on the experience and resources of the patient?
What is ordinary to you as a patient may be considered extraordinary by me. Maybe you have the resources to be kept alive in a comfortable institution, but I don't. Should my family have to reduce itself to poverty or deny their relationship (divorce/abandonment) so I can qualify for financial assistance to keep my body alive? That's the reality of the question for many people.
SFischer,MDiv
"Speaking from the floor,
"Speaking from the floor, Archbishop Daniel Pilarczyk urged Lori to consult as widely as possible â not so much because the content of the revisions is in doubt, but for what he called the âpoliticalâ objective of making it go down easier."
Oh, we're being offered an artificial spoon full of sugar to pretend anyone but the Vatican has any say in this issue. Are we all considered brain dead already?
colkoch.blogtoolkit.com







So overcome by their own
So overcome by their own right-to-life rhetoric that they cannot realize that in mandating that resources be used in a least efficacy domain they will be cheating others of life at a time of productivity.
When you thinnk of health care as a limited and finite resource you can see we cannot do it all even if we have the knowledge to do it all.
And I echo your question SFischer.