I saw the answer in India
Print Friendly Version| From Where I Stand by Joan Chittister, OSB | April 3, 2008 |
| Vol. 5, No. 24 |
Here's a riddle for you:
What voice of religion is almost impossible to hear -- but is everywhere?
Oh, go on, guess.
Priests? No, it's true that they have gotten to be fewer and fewer -- and in some parts of the world have completely disappeared -- but they have channels of communication that are much louder and clearer than their numbers would warrant.
Politicians? No, they all use religion to justify their political activities so they talk about it plenty. It's hard to believe in what most politicians call "religion" as long as it keeps starving, killing and suppressing people everywhere but they talk about it anyway.
Temples, pagodas, mosques and cathedrals? No, even though people everywhere seem to go to them less these days, there is nothing silent about them. They are still the official voice of religion around the world.
No, the omnipresent but unheard voice of religion I have in mind is the voice of women spiritual leaders. These are women of every faith and denomination -- Hindu gurus, Buddhist nuns, Jewish rabbis, Islamic sheiks, Christian clergywomen, native healers and spiritualist mediums who are carrying the values of their traditions, speaking the word of their sacred texts, practicing the values mandated by their various revelatory documents, building and sustaining faith communities everywhere -- but whose voices are still summarily ignored, suppressed, smothered by the leaders of the faith traditions to which they have given their lives and which thrive because of them.
As I have mentioned in recent columns, I was in Jaipur, India, March 3-10 with more than 450 women spiritual leaders from around the globe meeting around the theme "Making Way for the Feminine for the Good of the World." If that gathering indicated anything at all, it signaled the presence of women religious leaders everywhere, however, well-kept that secret may be in their own religious faith traditions. They have little or no official approbation. But one thing they do have. They have the love and support of the people.
I watched women's devotees by the hundreds sweep into the meeting tent in India where women such as these were speaking -- just to listen to their words for 15 minutes. I saw them line up for blessings and hugs and prayers and smiles of encouragement from women who had been doing the work of their religious traditions all their lives. I saw women light holy candles and chant holy chants and recite sacred texts and interpret the tradition with confidence and courage, however invisible they are to their official traditions everywhere.
And I heard them say strong spiritual words of indictment for religions that still the voice and witness of women. One Hindu brochure, for instance, read: "Shakti is founded and spearheaded by an enlightened woman mystic, Anandmurti Gurumaa, to save girls and empower them with education. Shakti is a wake up call to combat the heinous practices of female infanticide, feticide and the brutalities afflicted on the girl child in India. Sons … are preferred," the brochure explains, because "they are considered a source of support during old age and for performing religious rites at the time of cremation and subsequently." The work of Gurumaa to raise young women to be self-directing, free, educated and outspoken is presented without apology, without hesitation, in a country where, in the name of religion, women are routinely bought, sold, burned to death and seldom educated.
Dadi Janki, the 92-year-old founding member and now administrator of the million strong Brahma Kumaris and their 8,000 centers in more than 130 countries, devotes herself to the cause of women's rights and leadership positions in the public arena. In her plenary address to the conference, she called in plain terms for the inclusion of women on all levels and dimensions of both civic and religious leadership
Tenzin Palma, a Buddhist nun who is educating Tibetan nuns for ordination in a tradition that has not ordained nuns, simply goes on supporting women's monasteries, sacred philosophy courses, spiritual development and full Buddhist ordination everywhere -- all the while challenging the notion that male monks have better karma -- and are therefore more merit making -- than female monks.
Rabbi Naamah Kelman, the first ordained woman rabbi in Jerusalem, brings a solitary and strong witness to the women of the Hebrew Testament who were the judges, queens and leaders of their people, all the while promoting the first Jerusalem "Women's Torah Project" and its interpretation of scripture from multiple women scholars' points of view.
Native women religionists railed against the colonization of the spiritual lives of Africans by Western colonial religions and, smoldering with anger yet, called Westerners to take their patriarchal religions and leave the continent.
The voices of these women were loud and clear, strong and sure -- but nowhere officially institutionalized and everywhere resisted. For those who are told that the maleness of Jesus is the reason Christian women -- Catholic women -- cannot be members of the clergy, the question becomes a serious one theologically. If Jesus is the reason women must be invisible in the church, how did that same decree get into all the other religions where Jesus is not the focal point? Is the decree really divine -- or simply human, all too human everywhere -- in its origin?
The fact is that women are rising in every religion on earth. Maybe that's really the Divine word we're missing.
These women are involved in every dimension of the human condition -- political arenas, conflict areas, ecological sustainability, the concerns of women and girl-children, religious scholarship and liturgical development. They minister at their peril but they minister long after male ministers have fled the areas. After the armies go raping and plundering by, these spiritual leaders stay in the villages with the women, look after the children, build up the schools, repair the businesses and support the communities.
And yet, in a special session on gender reconciliation in religion, each of them, from every single tradition, cited the same kind of religious suppression of women by the official purveyors of the religion around them: invisibility in religious language; patriarchal interpretation of sacred texts; gender bias against women scholars; lack of institutional recognition of their work, their ministry, and their discipleship; refusal to recognize the authenticity and equality of their spiritual relationship with the divine; rejection of their voices, their direction, their wisdom. God, in every tradition, that is, is a sexist.
And these were only isolated examples of the women I heard in every session of this international forum, which was sponsored by the Global Peace Initiative.
I sat in the midst of them and tried to imagine any of their religious traditions without them. The temples would be empty, the people would be unserved, the sacred texts would all lie fallow in their tabernacles, hollow shells of the impulse which inspired them. But the rituals, apparently, would go on. The question is, are rituals enough to make a religious tradition truly religious? That's really the riddle we need to answer.
From where I stand, it looks like religions everywhere lack religion. At least they lack the vision, the openness and holiness of their founders. One thing is clear: If women finally accept the answer that they aren't wanted in religion and stop struggling to do what the sacred texts, all of them, call for in terms of equality, holiness, discipleship and sanctity -- then prayer, candles, incense and incantations will never be enough to substitute for the spirit of the religion these women bring but whose voices are unheard.
| Archives | Signup for Weekly E-mail |
Well, it seems we pretty
Well, it seems we pretty much agree that women have got to convince women that we are made in the image of God as much as men are. The question is how. How do I convince my sister who thinks God's spirit will work through the church at the proper time in history and there is nothing we can or should do about it? How do we convince women that the eucharist does not need a male body to have bread and wine transubstantiated (hope I used the right word there) that it's really done by the grace of God?
Sister Joan, how do we do this?
First, we must begin to
First, we must begin to comprehend
Second, the heros must stand
Third, the few must follow
Only then it will begin to happen....
...to comprehend: I cannot speak for the other cultures Sr.Joan speaks of. I do know that the inequality of women is cross-cultural and pan-historical. Of my Christian tradition I can only quote Tertullian(AD 160-220):"You are the devil's gateway; you are the unsealer of that forbidden tree; you are the first deserter of Divine Law. You are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man"(Jack Holland,"Misogyny", p.4). Regardless of the poetic language used by contemporary apologists the real "apologetics" is, I think, founded in this illogical,non-sense, self-decieving image. But...behind this rationale is the viceral, fundamental "hot-wire" of the dominant male that women are for the convenience of men. This 'convenience' like the concept of "love" is analagous; it is the continuum from serving the personal and institutional needs of men as in traditional women's religious orders to the domestic and sexual availability of wives to husbands to tolerating the inevitability of camp-followers to rape. Sexual exploitation requires the same terms as love but is de facto its antithesis.
The recent reports of a surge in incestuous rape in the social/political turmoil of Kenya, while despicable, is not surprising; nor is the Augustinian purging of one's sexuality as the supposed route to holiness. The paradox is that women must be available for the convenience of men but once that domination is activated it demonstrates man's failure (to dominate) as man. A man must either renounce compassion (rape); or renounce sex (celibicy). Both are renunciations of human sexuality. As long as service is rendered willingly there is peace, equanimity; if resisted, then compulsion, force is tolerable. As with both Tertullian and Augustine the warranted self-hate is projected onto woman. It is no wonder that men hate women or deny that they do and act as if they did.
...the heros must stand: Those few women ordained, the few women clerics of other denominations and the incursion of women into fields of combat, professions and other non-traditional roles though progressive are not sufficient. Incursions yes, but not breaches in the defences of domination. Maybe what is needed is a cross-section united in their femininity and informed solidarity, sufficient in numbers and organization to cause the multitude of those of good-faith to recognize, understand the issue and its correlories and demand full and unconditional access to equality and its consequences.
...those of good faith, women and men must follow, no stand with the heros....
...then it will begin to happen.
I have two children, a girl and a boy. I have been far from a perfect parent. When they were helpless, dependent infants I did not think I could ever love them more. As they grew I realized I was wrong. They became adults, self-sufficient, equals. They are nobodies in the great scheme of things but they are now my heros and I love them more than I ever did.
I just saw on the news this
I just saw on the news this morning that a study finds many asian families in the United States are opting for gender-determined pregnancies. Sons, of course. And young women think we've attained equality? No women priests but we've attained equality? And that is just in the U.S. where we think we have things better. Until religious traditions see women as true equals there will be no real equality. Religion seems to be the root of the spirit and if anything drives the moral grounds it will start for real in that sphere. One of the biggest problems though, is not the men in these religions, it's the women! It is the women who insist equality will come when the "spirit" says or the women who are happy with status quo, or (and I actually know some) women who think women are not as smart as men! If we can't convince women of their godliness how can we expect men in general to? Certainly many men have come to see we are equal and fight with us for it but just think if we actually had all women aboard? Hierarchies of men could not hold us back then.
Joan wrote: "If women
Joan wrote: "If women finally accept the answer that they aren't wanted in religion and stop struggling to do what the sacred texts, all of them, call for in terms of equality, holiness, discipleship and sanctity -- then prayer, candles, incense and incantations will never be enough to substitute for the spirit of the religion these women bring but whose voices are unheard."
I'm wondering... If the work of ministry is carried out by a ratio of about 83% - done by women who have no voice and the other 17% includes all the men (both laity and hierarchy), who is supporting the system - as it exists now? Women! Right? It is, by an immensely imbalanced ratio, the work of women to perpetuate a system that allows them no voice. Why is this? It seems that this is because the RCC teaches that it, itself, is the 'one, holy, catholic, apostolic church', not a jurisdictional part of the one, holy, catholic, apostolic church universal.
All of the complaining and rallying will not affect a bit of change at the top as long as there is no forum for the voice of women and women work to support it. If, though, there were a single week when the buckets and mops were still and women did no work at all, then, and only then, would women be noticed in any real way. Oh, but I forget myself; the church has become a cottage industry and paycheck and 401Ks might be at risk if something this drastic were to come about.
Yet, working within the institutional system or anywhere, we ARE the Church. The church would go on.
QB









Nice to hear of the efforts
Nice to hear of the efforts of Anandmurti Gurumaa, Dadi Janki, Tenzin Palma and Naamah Kelman, Sister. With your reports of the activities of these other groups, the question immediately comes to mind...Did you bring to the conference the enormous good works contributed by Catholic women religious, Catholic women saints and Catholic women doctors of the Church? Did you show the delegates how much the Catholic Church has supported women's dignity and the right to life for the unborn? Have you talked about how those rights were paid for with lifetimes of selfless service as well as with the blood of its martyrs? Did you speak about the huge role in education and medicine by Catholic women? How about evangelization and missionary work and the role of women in feeding the poor and disenfranchised? Since you took your vows before God to uphold the teachings Jesus Christ left us through His Church.
I imagine this conference presented an wonderful opportunity to expressing one's love of Christ's Church through representation and witness.