Social Ministry Day Two: Catholics 'politically homeless,' bishops' staffer says
Print Friendly VersionBy JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
Washington, D.C.
American Catholics are often âpolitically homeless,â according to the U.S. bishopsâ top officer for social action, given that neither of the two major parties fully embrace the churchâs social teaching â from opposition to abortion, for example, to support for health care and an end to the war in Iraq.
âWe donât fit with the right or the left, with Democrats or Republicans,â said John Carr, who directs the office for Justice, Peace and Human Development.
Referring to the annual Social Ministry Gathering, Carr said, âI sometimes think of us as a self-help group for the politically incorrect, for people who insist on standing both with the unborn and the undocumented.â
Nevertheless, Carr said this morning, this makes it âa great time to be a Catholic preacher, teacher or leader, because no one can accuse us of being shills for a partisan position.â
Carr, a veteran staffer of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, argued that a genuinely Catholic approach to politics cannot "cherry-pick" or be "selective."
âCatholic progressives ought to be measured by how they stand up for human life,â he said, âand Catholic conservatives by how they defend human dignity.â The âconsistent ethic of life,â Carr said, âdoesnât give any of us a free pass.â
Describing the political context for Catholic social ministry, Carr spoke of tremendous polarization in Washington.
âThe debate used to be within the 40-yard-lines,â Carr said. âToday everybodyâs in the end zones.â
Carr related, for example, that when the U.S. bishops were recently asked to meet with members of Congress to discuss the war on Iraq, they requested that the session be bipartisan â only to be told, Carr said, âthatâs not how we do things here.â
Carr described a sort of hyper-individualism on both the political right and left that both obstruct compassionate social policy.
âOn the right, thereâs the individualism of the market,â he said. âOn the left, thereâs lifestyle individualism, so that choice becomes the defining virtue of public life.â
Carr also lamented what he described as a lack of attention to poverty in the current presidential campaign, suggesting that the implied mantra of much political rhetoric seems to be, âWhatsoever you do unto the forgotten middle class, you do unto me.â
Ironically, Carr said, President George Bushâs âcompassionate conservatismâ seems to have informed his policy in Africa more successfully than his domestic agenda.
Carr also acknowledged that some Catholic veterans of social ministry have been discouraged by the recent wave of down-sizing in church ministries, including, he noted, a reduction in social action staff at the bishopsâ conference from 37 to 24.
Nonetheless, Carr said, his experience of interviewing candidates for positions in the conference renewed his optimism.
âI met people who would give almost anything to do what we do every day,â Carr said. âWe must not forget that this is important work.â
Carr argued that the recent document from the U.S. bishops on Catholics and politics, âFaithful Citizenship,â provides a template for âlifting up our church and changing our nation.â It deliberately does not tell people how to vote, he said, but it seeks to form consciences in accord with the full range of Catholic teaching.
"We donât need Catholic Pat Robertsons or Jesse Jacksons,â Carr said. âItâs not about religious leaders telling people how to vote.â
In that connection, Carr referred to a Feb. 23 op/ed piece in the Washington Post by former NCR Washington correspondent Joe Feuerherd, who suggested that âFaithful Citizenshipâ marked a âright-wing lurchâ by the conference.
Carr was among the drafters of the document on behalf of the bishopsâ conference.
âIronically, you could write an identical column about how âFaithful Citizenshipâ sold out the unborn and provides a roadmap for voting for a pro-choice candidate,â Carr said. âBut you know, and I know, that our reality is much more complicated.â
Carrâs address was frequently laced with humor. For example, expressing astonishment on the overwhelming vote in favor of the âFaithful Citizenshipâ document at the U.S. bishopsâ fall meeting in Baltimore, he said: âItâs not clear that even the Trinity would pass with only four negative votes.â
Explaining his own sense of political disenfranchisement, Carr also said he sometimes feels like he needs a 12-step program: âIâm John, and Iâm addicted to papal encyclicals!â
In the end, Carr said, âFaithful Citizenshipâ calls for a form of Catholic political engagement which is:
âą Political, not partisan;
âą Principled, not ideological;
âą Civil, not soft;
âą Engaged, not used.
Sponsored by 18 different Catholic organizations, including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Social Ministry Gathering brings together around 700 diocesan and parish-level leaders involved in charitable service and social advocacy. The session runs Feb. 24-27 in Washington, D.C.
I could not be more in
I could not be more in agreement with Mr. Carr. I think it is hard for informed Catholics to find people to vote for. What's wrong with a pro-life Democrat? Where are all the pro-peace Republicans? There are signs of hope: staunch conservatives, like the recently deceased William Buckley, have decried the war in Iraq; and there is a growing disgust for abortion as a lifestyle choice even among young liberals. We need to get past the era of people selling out their faith over political partisanship--down with Mario Cuomo; down with George Weigel.
âOn the right, thereâs
âOn the right, thereâs the individualism of the market,â he said. âOn the left, thereâs lifestyle individualism, so that choice becomes the defining virtue of public life.â
This is where I get confused. I thought choice was the defining virtue in a democracy. It's called a vote. I also thought free will was the defining virtue that separated man from other animals in God's scheme of things. Where did I go wrong?
colkoch.blogtoolkit.com
Participation in the process
Participation in the process of government is the defining "virtue" (if one may refer to voting as an attitude that increases one's well-being) of democracy - not some abstract quality called 'choice', and particularly not an unreasoned reduction of all matters (including ethical matters) to matters of 'choice'.







How about "down with anyone"
How about "down with anyone" who makes such personal attacks. Let's remember to debate with ideas. George Weigel is a good friend, faithful Catholic, and acts/writes in good conscience and good faith. He seeks always to express some of the vast mind of the Church. Perhaps you should actually read his work rather than what you've anecdotally heard about it.