National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

My day in court

 Print Friendly Version
  On the Road to Peace by John Dear S.J.    Tuesday, January 29, 2008  
       Vol. 2, No. 21  

"You are a renegade priest and a renegade citizen. Many people think you're a hero of nonviolence, but you're a phony. You're a fraud. You are a person of violence because you used a hammer on one of our nuclear weapons! You're a coward. You're afraid. You are no Gandhi. I will not join your cause, but I will not make a martyr out of you so that the world thinks you are the heir of Gandhi."

These were the words of the federal judge last week as he sentenced me for an antiwar protest. (For background see: ncrcafe.org/node/1565.)

In my speech, I quoted Gandhi and suggested that the judge either renounce his verdict and join our campaign to end the ongoing evil U.S. war on Iraq, or if he really believed in the system that is killing Iraqi children and maintaining weapons of mass destruction, give me the maximum sentence.

He sentenced me to six months of supervised probation, 40 hours of community service and a $510 fine. Months earlier, my co-defendants were also chastised, but none received this sentence. (One was fined $35; others had their six hours of community service suspended.) I said I would not pay anything, not do community service and not cooperate with the system. I was ordered to report immediately to the U.S. Probation Office, where I was told that I was not allowed to leave New Mexico for the next six months without permission, that I would have weekly visits with a probation officer, that they would make surprise visits to the place where I live perhaps weekly, and that they might require weekly drug testing. I told him I would not cooperate. Later, another probation officer said to me, "You will lose, Fr. John, if you buck the system."

So I expect they will issue a warrant for my arrest, haul me back before the judge, and put in me in jail for a certain time. The saga continues.

I'm grateful for the prayers, blessings and support of friends near and far. One said to me in the courtroom afterwards, "You should just do the sentence and move on. It's been a year and a half since you were arrested in the elevator. It isn't worth all this trouble." In many ways I agree. The government should never have arrested us, prosecuted us, tried us and sentenced us. But now, why not get it over with?

One big reason is that the war goes on, even though it doesn't get much media coverage. In the political campaigns and primaries, the war is barely mentioned (neither is the environmental crisis, global poverty, nuclear weapons, the death penalty, or other urgent crises).

Few politicians, pundits or priests speak about the war. Dennis Kucinich talked about this glaring cover up as he bowed out of the race last Friday. "We asked for jobs," he said, "we get war. We asked for healthcare, we get war. We asked for funds for education, we get war. We ask for a clean environment, we get war. It is time to end this war. It is time to end war as policy and have the government start taking care of things here at home."

A Pax Christi friend who attended the sentencing told me of the death in Iraq last week of a 21-year-old New Mexican. The entire town turned out for his funeral. The flags went up, the church was packed, and the priest spoke at length about the just war theory. He said this was a just war, that the young man died for a just cause. Everyone in town, except my friend, was relieved. Her sad story confirmed my determination to resist this ongoing unjust war, and to do so as a priest.

As a Christian and Jesuit, I feel I must say no to the war, in this case by resisting the system. During those moments when my life feels disrupted, I recall the millions of Iraqis and Afghanis who have had their lives disrupted and destroyed because of our war, and I realize it's a small price.

The pursuit of peace, I believe, doesn't necessarily make us feel better and bring us consolation. It often leads to misunderstandings, attacks, hate mail, insults, and legal jeopardy -- to the cross. But this seems to be the way the struggle has always gone -- from Jesus and the early Christians to Mahatma Gandhi and Dorothy Day.

In a culture of war, if you speak for peace, your life will be disrupted. In a world of poverty, hunger, racism, nuclear weapons, global warming, if you take a public stand for justice and social change, your life will be disrupted. In a time of empire, if you resist the imperial authorities, your life will be disrupted. It's much easier to sit back, not get involved, not challenge the system, and delude ourselves into thinking we are making peace because we are so peaceful. I think we have to challenge the system, if we can.

The Gospel story remains the primary motivation for my resistance. I'm always amazed that Jesus did not spend his life sitting under a tree, dispensing his wisdom. He stood up, spoke out, and marched to Jerusalem, where he confronted the culture of injustice, the empire and its religious backers, and suffered the consequences of his civilly disobedient, nonviolent action. His life was disrupted, wrecked, shattered.

On the morning of my sentencing, I reread the Gospel accounts of his trials, how he was hauled before the Sanhedrin, Annas and Caiaphas, Pilate and Herod and back to Pilate, before he was finally condemned to death. Jesus was called every name in the book. At one point, he was struck in the face by a soldier. By and large, he kept silent, and emerged as the true judge over the courts and the empire and through his nonviolent suffering love, all humanity.

If I want to enter his story, share his life, and follow his lead, I have to enter the fray and resist the empire, too, and that's a messy and complicated business. Still, it's a blessing to be misunderstood, insulted and in legal jeopardy for one's pursuit of God's reign of peace. As I left the courthouse, I remembered the Sermon on the Mount: "Blessed are you when they insult you…Rejoice and be glad!"

This week marks the 60th anniversary of Gandhi's assassination. Gandhi maintained that the pursuit of truth and the practice of active nonviolence require public confrontation with the system of injustice, trusting that the acceptance of suffering in love and truth will win out in the long run.

"Nonviolence in its dynamic condition means conscious suffering," Gandhi wrote. "It does not mean meek submission to the will of the evildoer, but it means the pitting of one's whole soul against the will of the tyrant. Working under this law of our being, it is possible for a single individual to defy the whole might of an unjust empire to save his honor, his religion, his soul and lay the foundation for that empire's fall."

"Nonviolence means courage of the highest order and therefore readiness to suffer," Gandhi wrote. "Let those who believe in nonviolence as the only method of achieving real freedom, keep the lamp of nonviolence burning bright in the midst of the present impenetrable gloom. The truth of a few will count, the untruth of millions will vanish even like chaff before a whiff of wind."

With such words, such examples, I take heart, count my blessings, and keep on saying no to war, hoping with friends that someday, we will be able finally to say yes to a new era of peace and nonviolence.

  Archives    Signup for Weekly E-mail  

Fr. Dear is scheduled to lead a Lenten retreat Feb. 22-24, "The Passion, Death and Resurrection of the Nonviolent Jesus," at the Kirkridge Center in Bangor, Pa. (www.kirkridge.org). The DVD, "The Narrow Path," featuring his teachings on Gospel nonviolence, is available from www.sandamianofoundation.org. To attend one of his speaking events, or to host him later this fall for a reading from his forthcoming autobiography, see: www.johndear.org.

I just received the

I just received the Newspaper Article out of the Albuquerque journal that featured Fr. John's story, in a care package from my mother. Being a past member of one of Father John's congregations in Northeastern New Mexico, I must say that this sentencing struck me as biased and inconsistent. But I am praying for Judge Svet, that he will one day know the mercy and love of a peaceful God.

I take comfort in knowing that there are still people in the world that can grasp the intentions God had for the world during creation.

I know that God is smiling down on you Fr. John, and the works that you are carrying out. My campus and I are praying for you, and praying that we too may have an impact on the world the way that you have. Thank you for your faithfulness and service.

Native of Cimarron, New Mexico
Currently in Hillsboro, KS

Rated 4 by one user. see individual ratings

John, may the Lord continue

John, may the Lord continue to give you courage and wisdom in your witnessing for peace. Your example is an inspiration to many people around the world. I often pray for you

Rated 4 by 3 users. see individual ratings

Prophetic acts such as Fr.

Prophetic acts such as Fr. Dear's are necessary in order to achieve these spiritual purposes: 1) To show our willingness to suffer for the sake of our love of Christ and 2) In order to demonstrate that these injustices are not "ordinary", but cry out to God for public recognition and public action. Clearly the war in Iraq is not a private matter between each person and his or her conscience, but a public crime that can only be justly addressed in a public way.

Rated 2.6667 by 3 users. see individual ratings

A statement from Jim Forest

A statement from Jim Forest seems relevant for this "Prophetic Action":

"Both Dorothy and Merton were firm believers in patient efforts simply to communicate to others what the Gospel is all about, what the Church teaches, and the value of paying attention to saints who in various ways set a timely example. This is not so much carrying out what are sometimes called “prophetic actions” as engaging in ordinary acts of communication. While being patient and even supportive of me and others who engaged in such dramatic acts of civil disobedience as breaking into draft offices and burning draft files, neither Dorothy nor Merton recommended such tactics as a method of protest." (Jim Forest at the Catholic Peace Fellowship conference in South Bend, Indiana, on 24 March 2007)

Rated 2 by one user. see individual ratings

As for Thomas Merton "not

As for Thomas Merton "not recommending such tactics as a method of protest"; he would not have condemned such acts or persons either as you have stated.

When things get so bad and evil and we bear witness to such evil extremes, prophetic non-violent action is the only Christian recourse, even if it is perceived to appear to look violent or is "disobedient" to the powers in the world.

Jesus, as a reminder, overturned the tables of the moneychangers, who were not giving the right change back to unsuspecting foreigners with different foreign currencies. The moneychangers were stealing. Jesus did not just comment with words, although He did say much that we can read in the Gospels. Jesus made a whip of cords and chased them out of the Temple entrance, whose prejudiced leaders did not also allow entry to lepers or cripples. He is the Just example to follow and I think it was followed when people burned their draft cards and draft files, as opposed to the violent arming themselves with guns, as a symbol of their contempt for the Vietnam War and corrupt government in general.

The choice to destroy that which was public property in the form of paper and legitimately owned by the people who burned the draft files, is the important distinction here, over the government's destroying people's lives with the draft to a war to immorally teach and arm them to kill others. This is an important distinction.

Thomas Merton was a Catholic monk who contemplated deeply, actively commented about the issues of his day and brought his enlightened insight and perspective to the world, a world which in many ways still prefers the darkness to the light, which perceives the dark as light. Merton is a leading example of one who thought and wrote about the world we were living in, in the good ole USA, and a world which he found on the brink of self-annihilation and nuclear proliferation, a world that he could not separate himself from in its struggles, who also saw the distinction between self-righteous acts of anarchy and the patience and wisdom of selflessness, as did Jesus when he physically overturned the tables of the corrupt who were abusing their power in the world.

How is Jim Forest's quote to be of benefit here to us in relation to non-violent resistance to evil and corruptness and War? Would you please elaborate on what you mean by quoting Jim Forest on Thomas Merton?

Thomas Merton was a Trappist contemplative and John Dear is a Jesuit, but their shared experience in Jesus Christ and witness to the world we are living in as Christians is expressed differently in their types of actions in a different age. Merton was the writer and scholar, peace activist in the sense that united with Christ he found His peace by seeking Him. John Dear is a writer, a scholar, and is active in the world community in a different relationship and calling than Merton in his day, but like Merton is united with Christ's teachings and has found His peace by seeking Christ, has found Christ in Merton and is revealing this spirit to our present age.

Rated 4 by 2 users. see individual ratings

Thank God for the Rev. John

Thank God for the Rev. John Dear. I am most thankful for his faithful witness for peace. Let us keep him in prayer and find more ways to support and encourage his amazing witness. What else might we do on his behalf? Maybe we should flood the judge with words of support and thanks for Father John.

Peace

Wes Taylor

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

What else might we do on his

What else might we do on his behalf? What does the Lord require of you? Teacher, what must I do?
The question and answer have been put in many forms, but the answer is always similar "Seek justice, leave your nets, take up your cross, give everything you have, follow me."
How far does Jesus want us to follow him? How far did he go?

How would Donald Svet and other such "judges" react were they to receive a hundred, or two hundred disciples like John Dear in front of their hammers?
Yes, I believe we should pray for John Dear, but prayer is a concentration of our minds on our own walks of discipleship and what the Lord requires of us.

Not yet rated.

Thank God for the witness of

Thank God for the witness of the Rev. John Dear. Let us keep him in prayer. Maybe we should flood the judge with letters of support for John Dear, a true and genuine peacemaker.
Rev. Wes Taylor
(Oregon)

Rated 4 by one user. see individual ratings