National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

Highlights from papal homilies and addresses; From the 'no sense of humor' file

 Print Friendly Version
 All Things Catholic by John L. Allen, Jr.
  Friday, January 11, 2008 - Vol. 7, No. 18  

College football fans probably felt a bit deflated this Tuesday, since the Bowl Championship Series, always their favorite time of year, came to a close Monday night. For Vatican devotees, Tuesday likewise brought a twinge of melancholy, and for much the same reason: the annual "bowl championship series" of papal teaching, which begins in mid-December with a message for the World Day of Peace, ended Monday with the pope's address to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Holy See.

Between those rhetorical bookends fell three important homilies (Christmas, the Feast of Mary the Mother of God on New Year's, and Epiphany), as well as a major speech to the Roman Curia, the year-end Urbi et Orbi message, a vespers service on New Year's Eve, and four Angelus addresses. All told, Benedict XVI offered more than 17,500 words of teaching, a veritable buffet of verbiage.

Since the pope's BCS is now over, it's a good time to roll the highlight reel. Doing so may offer hints of Benedict's priorities for 2008, a year that will feature his April 15-20 visit to the United States.

(1) Around the World
At the geopolitical level, Benedict underscored the Vatican's "preferential option" for the Middle East and Africa. Those were the only two zones specifically cited in Benedict's message for the World Day of Peace, marked by the Vatican on Jan. 1.

In his Jan. 7 address to diplomats, Benedict wielded his most dramatic language to date about the crisis in Darfur, warning that "hope seems almost vanquished by the menacing sequence of hunger and death." Speaking in French, Benedict also expressed concern for Congo, Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya.

On the Middle East, the pope called anew for peace between Israelis and Palestinians. He said the Lebanese people should be able to "decide freely on their future," an indirect reference to outside interference, above all from Syria. The pope also voiced alarm over "terrorist attacks, threats and violence" in Iraq, "especially against the Christian community."

Turning to Asia, the pope mentioned Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Myanmar. On Europe, Benedict praised progress towards peace in the Balkans and called for resolution of the long-running drama in Cyprus. He said unity in Europe will endure "if it does not deny its Christian roots."

Benedict also called for stronger antipoverty efforts and for disarmament, specifically urging a negotiated resolution to disputes over Iran's nuclear program.

(2) The Family
The theme of the World Peace Day message was "The Human Family, A Community of Peace." The pope argued that the family, based on marriage between a man and a woman, is the natural building block of society and a "school of peace."

In that regard, the pope argued that "family values" and social justice, often opposed in secular politics, are a package deal: trying to have one without the other, he warned, is a prescription for heartache.

"Everything that serves to weaken the family based on the marriage of a man and a woman," he said, "everything that directly or indirectly stands in the way of its openness to the responsible acceptance of a new life, everything that obstructs its right to be primarily responsible for the education of its children, constitutes an objective obstacle on the road to peace."

(3) The Environment
Benedict XVI returned repeatedly to what has become a leitmotif of his social and political concerns: the environment, especially energy scarcity. In his Christmas homily, for example, the pope lamented "the abuse of energy and its selfish and reckless exploitation," saying that we witness today "a polluted world whose future is at risk."

Benedict distinguished his purchase on ecology from secular environmentalism, insisting in his World Day of Peace message that human beings possess transcendent worth vis-à-vis nature, and that environmental policy must be crafted free from "ideological pressure to draw hasty conclusions."

At the same time, Benedict insisted that "the problems looming on the horizon are complex, and the time is short."

With the diplomats, the pope quoted Paul VI's well-known adage that "development is the new name of peace." He added ecology to the mix, saying: "Peace is a commitment and a manner of life which demands that the legitimate aspirations of all should be satisfied, such as access to food, water and energy, to medicine and technology, or indeed the monitoring of climate change."

In his homily for Epiphany, Benedict stressed the need for sustainable patterns of consumption, especially in developed nations. He argued that such moderation today is not merely "an ascetic rule, but a path of salvation for humanity."

(4) Islam
Benedict twice cited a letter addressed to him in October by 138 Muslim jurists, clerics and scholars, suggesting theological common ground between Muslims and Christians.

"I responded with joy, expressing my deep agreement with those noble sentiments, and at the same time underlining the urgency of a common effort to defend the values of reciprocal respect, dialogue and collaboration," he told the Roman Curia.

"Our shared recognition of the existence of a single God, a benevolent Creator and universal Judge of everyone's conduct, constitutes the basis for common action in defense of the dignity of every human person, and for the creation of a more just and fraternal society."

While the comments expressed Benedict's desire for dialogue, observers also noted his deliberate use of the term "reciprocal" -- a signal that he will not abandon his core challenge of "reciprocity," meaning respect for religious freedom, especially the rights of Christian minorities.

In early January, the pope's top official for inter-religious dialogue, French Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, told L'Osservatore Romano that a delegation of Muslim leaders will come to Rome in February or March to plan a historic session between Benedict XVI and a delegation of signatories to the letter for later in 2008.

Storm clouds, however, already have begun to gather over that session. On Jan. 9, Jesuit Fr. Khalil Samir, one of the Vatican's most influential advisors on Islam, published an essay with the "Asia News" service warning that Muslim organizers may be seeking "escape in theological dialogue" as a way of avoiding tough questions about human rights and religious freedom.

(5) Natural Law
Benedict XVI repeatedly insisted that social values such as peace, justice and human rights have to be anchored in natural law, meaning a universal moral truth that cuts across cultures and time.

"Law can be an effective force for peace only if its foundations remain solidly anchored in natural law, given by the Creator," Benedict told the diplomats on Monday.

In that speech, Benedict argued that the concept of natural law is implicit in many international declarations and agreements on human rights -- including the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, which marks its 60th anniversary in 2008.

In his message for World Peace Day, Benedict argued that grasping natural law does not require specifically religious convictions.

"Knowledge of the natural moral norm is not inaccessible to those who, in reflecting on themselves and their destiny, strive to understand the inner logic of the deepest inclinations present in their being," the pope said. "Albeit not without hesitation and doubt, they are capable of discovering, at least in its essential lines, this common moral law."

Natural law is likely to be a key theme in Benedict's April 18 address to the United Nations. The Catholic University of America is sponsoring a major conference on "A Common Morality" March 27-30, organized at the pope's request.

(6) Christ and Justice
Perhaps the signature touch in Benedict's social teaching is his insistence that efforts to build a just society are doomed to failure -- at times, monstrous failure -- without God, who is revealed in Christ.

"To the thirst for meaning and value so characteristic of today's world, to the search for prosperity and peace that marks the lives of all mankind, to the hopes of the poor: Christ -- true God and true Man -- responds with his Nativity," the pope said in his Urbi et Orbi address.

In his speech to the Curia, Benedict laid out his social vision.

"By coming to know Christ, we come to know God, and only beginning from God can we understand the human person and the world, a world that otherwise remains a question without an answer," he said.

"It's so important that in the 'balance sheet' of humanity, facing the sentiments and realities of violence and injustice that threaten us, opposing forces be aroused and reinvigorated," Benedict said. "Through the encounter with Jesus Christ and his saints, through the encounter with God, the balance sheet of humanity is reinforced by those forces of good without which all our efforts in the social order never become reality, but -- facing extraordinary pressures from other interests opposed to peace and justice --remain abstract theories."

(7) "Affirmative Orthodoxy"
Finally, the holidays offered illustrations of what I've come to call Benedict XVI's "affirmative orthodoxy," meaning a defense of classic Catholic doctrine phrased in positive fashion.

The pope devoted his 3,000-word World Peace Day message, for example, to extolling the family based on marriage between a man and a woman, open to the gift of life, without once mentioning hot-button "family values" issues such as abortion and homosexuality. They were part of the subtext, but he allowed them to remain there, preferring to articulate a positive vision.

Another example came in Benedict's address to the Roman Curia, on evangelization.

Benedict argued that the motive for mission is not that people will otherwise be damned, but rather so that the Kingdom of God, with its promise of reconciliation and true happiness, may reach all humanity.

"St. Paul actually felt himself under a sort of 'obligation' to announce the Gospel, not so much out of concern for the salvation of individual non-baptized people who have not yet heard the Gospel, but rather because he was aware that history in its totality could not reach its fulfillment until all people were reached by the Gospel," Benedict said.

In his homily for the Dec. 31 vespers service, Benedict described an approach which could serve as a summary of affirmative orthodoxy: the key is proceeding, he said, "without making a lot of noise, and in patient confidence."

* * *

Daily updates this week contain items of interest for "All Things Catholic" readers:

  • "Vatican faces ticking clock on prayer for conversion of Jews": http://ncrcafe.org/node/1530
  • "Natural law key to world peace, Benedict tells diplomats": http://ncrcafe.org/node/1522
  • "Vatican to Jesuits: 'Think with the Church'": http://ncrcafe.org/node/1521
  • An extended analysis of Benedict XVI's "affirmative orthodoxy" can be found here: http://ncrcafe.org/node/1513
  • "Pope taps Princeton water expert, believer in global warming for science academy": http://ncrcafe.org/node/1533

* * *

Finally, an item from the "no sense of humor" file: News wires moved a story this week about a private television program in Slovakia that's been slapped with a two million koruna fine (roughly $88,000) for "abusing viewers' religious sensibilities."

Its crime? Poking fun of a recent set of "Ten Commandments for Drivers" issued by the Pontifical Council for Migrants and Itinerant Persons, which came in the middle of a lengthy document released over the summer treating a grab-bag of issues related to people on the move.

"Priests are not the best people" to give advice on rules of the road, the Slovakian TV program jokingly suggested, since the Vatican has "only two kilometers of highway, and the last traffic accident was more than half a year ago."

While there certainly is real anti-Catholicism in the world, it's hard to take this seriously as a case in point.

By the way, it's worth recalling that the eminent American Catholic writer George Weigel, certainly not someone given to wounding Catholic sensibilities, scathingly referred to the new-style Ten Commandments as "faux-theological blah-blah." In an August column, he also invited the pope to ponder whether such a bit of PR flourish "isn't an embarrassment to the Holy See, and an impediment to the church's evangelical mission."

Weigel might be well advised to stay off Slovakian TV for a while … or to bring his checkbook.

  ArchivesSignup for Weekly E-mail  
The e-mail address for John L. Allen Jr. is jallen@ncronline.org

Unfortunately, when the Pope

Unfortunately, when the Pope speaks, many of his Bishops and clergy don't listen - or selectively listen. Reading what John posted about the Pope's speeches, mt heart was moved. However, when I see and read what comes out from Bishop's office in Charlotte, NC - I am left to wonder: The recurring theme in the diocesan newspaper public adoration of the Eucharist (like the scenes in the street in NY in the movie Th Godfather 2 and 3, when the Don was an aspiring mafia boss) and pro-life. If you were only a reader of the paper you would like that Catholics like to have parades, carrying statutes and and the Eucharist - and are pro-life. All the other stuff, which the Pope spoke about is buried in the back pages.

Adoration of the saints and Eucharist and marching them down the street is fine. And certainly, calling attention the wrongs of abortion must be done. But our faith is much more than that. The Pope speaks about our callings...Seeking and doing justice...Pursing peace...Protecting the earth God gave us... Reaching out to our brothers and sisters who may not share our same theological views and seeking greater understanding...If we want to march in the streets, let's mobilize the faithful to join us addressing these issues. When the Church does this, I believe it most Christ-like.

Jon Hus

Rated 4 by one user. see individual ratings

I see no one has mentioned

I see no one has mentioned what I thought when I read this article: The pope insists we marrieds be open to "life". I understand he thinks we should be having lots of children yet then says we shouldn't use up mother earth. Perhaps we should not have so many children and thereby bring ourselves back to a population that earth can handle. The bible doesn't say to over populate so why does the church keep insisting on it?

Rated 2.7778 by 9 users. see individual ratings

And just what do you

And just what do you consider "over population?"
If all the people in the world were placed in the state of Texas, the population density would be comparable to that of Japan.
Overpopulation has never been the problem; the problem is poverty. The chief cause of poverty is dictatorial governments, absence of economic freedom, and single parent households.

Rated 2.3333 by 3 users. see individual ratings

I agree with you on the

I agree with you on the point regarding overpopulation. However, the chief cause of poverty is not known actually. You even list three things that might have a relationship instead of only one.

I would consider the single parent household as much a symptom as a cause of poverty. Some dictatorial governments are the cause of poverty in their countries, as is seen in parts of Africa, while some are the opposite, as is seen in parts of the Middle East. And, what is the absence of economic freedom? Some might argue that their economic freedom involves the right to use up the resources of whatever property they own even though that has a devastating long-term impact on the environment that would then make human habitation impossible.

How many children would one married couple actually bring into the world considering the options of self-control, timing of intercourse, and natural child spacing resulting from extended breastfeeding are all natural ways of limiting fertility? How, in fact, is it possible that some married couples, in the days before birth control and widespread discussion of the topic, only ended up with one or two children and a happy marriage? Is a marriage open to bringing forth new life necessarily one that produces a huge amount of children?

Rated 4 by 3 users. see individual ratings

I would argue, not so

I would argue, not so helpfully perhaps, that sin is the cause of poverty. If we could only get people to stop sinning, (including governmental sins like over taxation, and corporate sins of underpaying and overcharging), we would see poverty all but vanish in a few generations.

---

On another note I sincerely believe we will never solve the problem of poverty (not that we shouldn't try). After all Christ did say that the poor will always be with us.

++++++
What I'm Listening To...

Not yet rated.

here today, I hope you won't

here today, I hope you won't support efforts to eradicate sin and poverty, but rather try to reduce the ill effects thereof. It seems that all lot of the atrocities against human individuals have come from efforts based in the belief that these things can be eliminated from society.

Not yet rated.

"St. Paul actually felt

"St. Paul actually felt himself under a sort of 'obligation' to announce the Gospel, not so much out of concern for the salvation of individual non-baptized people who have not yet heard the Gospel, but rather because he was aware that history in its totality could not reach its fulfillment until all people were reached by the Gospel," Benedict said.

Recently my husband and I were discussing St. Paul and how there seems to be so much more emphasis on him, at least in recent years. I suppose he is the evangelists' evangelist. Anyway, Pope Benedict's quote above struck me in an innocently perplexing moment wondering how Benedict arrived at what "St. Paul actually felt."

To be honest, I have had strange suspicions about Paul, at least the writings that have come down to us; the issue of the treatment of women being of concern. The other day it really became very clear who he was, even though I had 'heard' it many times before. He was not one of the original Apostles, but was an enemy of the Apostles and had actually witnessed the death of St. Stephen. The Lord appeared to this Christian-hater and Christian-killer and chose him to do the Lord's work. How fascinating when I think about that fact about Saul turning into Paul. If only Bin Laden could be so zapped by the Holy Spirit....

Then I thought about the gift of the Holy Spirit that Jesus kept telling the Apostles would come after He left them to go away for a while. God decided on giving the Holy Spirit to Saul, of all people, to go and proclaim the Good News of Jesus Christ to foreign lands, while the original Apostles stayed close to their homeland. (I think that is true, but I could be wrong.) I thought that was very generous of God to do! God not only rid the world of such a hater and killer by transforming him by the Holy Spirit, but had him working on our side.

I believe whatever Paul did He did it at the request of the Lord. He certainly was unique in that respect. As for the comments about women that seem out of place, I think some other writer added it in.

I would like to know how Pope Benedict arrived at his conclusion to say what he said about St. Paul in the quote above. It would be an interesting read if he were to elaborate. But, sometimes when I read things that Benedict has written, it is not so easy to comprehend and is very lengthy.

Rated 2 by 3 users. see individual ratings

Paul said the husband is

Paul said the husband is head of the wife as Christ is head of the Church. The Church submits to Christ in all things; Christ died for the Church. The wife submits to the husband; the husband is willing to die for the wife.
The relation between husband and wife (authority wise) is similar to that between king and prophet in the Old Testament. The King was boss; he prophet told the king how to be a good boss. That is the way happy families work, too.

Rated 0 by one user. see individual ratings

The patriarchal family as we

The patriarchal family as we know it has been around for about 5000 years. Coincidentally, that period of time has been one of unprecidented development and growth for humankind. We went from bronzeware to software. Unremitting warfare existed in everyday battles over territory and resources long before that and has been replaced by the rule of law where traditional families are predominant, having replaced the tribal or poligamous arrangements that existed earlier. No doubt, strong arguments can be made in behalf of the "traditional family", and "school of peace" is just the first. DGS

Rated 2.5 by 2 users. see individual ratings

The march of progress:

The march of progress: Bronze to Tech: kinship tribalism to Legal nuclear families: patriarchal dominance to that wonderful diversity of inclusive families:

All leading to the Epiphany: the passage of proprietary claims of identity to that covenantal reality obtained in Being Children of God ... ahhhhhhhh ...

[Don't you just love it when the Kingdom shines through!]

The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy

"Arise, shine; for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD has risen upon you. (Is 60:1)

Rated 3 by 3 users. see individual ratings

The patriarchal family as we

The patriarchal family as we know it has been around for about 5000 years. Coincidentally, that period of time has been one of almost unremitting warfare with relatively brief periods of peace in between. No doubt, strong arguments can be made in behalf of the "traditional family", but "school of peace" is not one of them.

Rated 3.1538 by 13 users. see individual ratings

Your argument is a non

Your argument is a non sequitur.
If peace making is not learned in the family I doubt it will learned at all. Obviously, not all families are skilled in child raising and mutual support, which does not disprove the premise.

Blessings.

Rated 2 by 2 users. see individual ratings

Actually Donje, one of the

Actually Donje, one of the programs which is making a difference in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict is a basketball program aimed at children 8-16. The teams are made up of a mix of kids from both countries. The results have been encouraging as competitive athletic talent is appreciated no matter what side of the fence the child came from. Especially if that talented child is on your team.

The biggest problems have come from the parents. Some of them don't appreciate their children fraternizing with the 'enemy'. This program originally started in Northern Ireland, and the initial success in Northern Ireland prompted it's introduction in Palestine and Isreal.

The object is obviously to get these kids out of the toxic environment of their families in order to let them see their 'enemy' is not really their enemy. He/she is just another kid like them.

Kudos to the NBA for supporting this program: PeacePlayers International.

Rated 3.7143 by 7 users. see individual ratings

Which, I think, goes to

Which, I think, goes to show: It's the Christian family which makes the difference, not card-carrying, but real Christian.

Not yet rated.

I have to make a pair of

I have to make a pair of comments. First, the idea that George Weigel, who has been a defender of George W. Bush's neoconservative war in Iraq and Bernard Law's reign in Boston, should call anything an embarrassment to Catholicism is itself laughable.

Also, Benedict XVI implies that same sex unions are a threat to world peace. When I open a newspaper, I see violence in Pakistan, Sudan, Kenya, Iraq, Afghanistan, as well as on the streets of America's cities. As far as I can tell, same sex unions are not to blame for any of this violence. Indeed, the few places in the world that do have state sanctioned same sex unions appear to be some of the least violent places on earth. Rather I believe that poverty, greed, ignorance, and xenophobia are the leading causes of violence.

Rated 3.65 by 20 users. see individual ratings

Dear Cashelguy~ Great

Dear Cashelguy~ Great points. I would add to your list of "leading causes of violence". I can't come up with a single word to capture its meaning but it is that frequent corelative to the conviction of being right - that is, that everybody who believes differently is wrong. That characteristic seems to trigger violence in some, verbal and/or otherwise, and in others the defense or toleration gene that condones the other.

Rated 4 by 5 users. see individual ratings

Is (smug)

Is (smug) "Self-righteousness" one or two words?

By the way, Dennis, I ALWAYS make sure to read your commentary. You are clear, concise & compassionate. Thanks for your considered and deliberate words.

God's peace,

e+

The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy

"Arise, shine; for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD has risen upon you. (Is 60:1)

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

Rev.McCoy ~ Thank you

Rev.McCoy ~ Thank you

Not yet rated.

I presume you feel a need to

I presume you feel a need to defend the Gay subculture. May I suggest there are bigger fish to fry. Why should a child of God want to be defined by his/her sexuality? Which is totally temporal and completely irrelevant after death.
Poverty does not cause violence; some of the poorest people have been nonviolent.
Greed causes violence as does sin(missing the mark)in general.
Ignorance is overcome by teachers who are loving, who are often attacked by persons who hate truth and who want to force their viewpoints.
Love yourself; God likes you as you are. None of us are any happier for all the people who love us if we won't love ourselves.-- Thanks for reading this far.

Rated 2.7143 by 7 users. see individual ratings

My post has nothing remotely

My post has nothing remotely to do with gay or straight subculture. I was referring to BXVI's bizarre claim that same sex unions are a threat to world peace. If he has any evidence to back up that up I would like to hear it. A few years ago a certain president told us Iraq'a cache of weapons of mass destruction were a threat to world peace. I didn't buy that either.

Steve

Rated 3.625 by 8 users. see individual ratings

What!? Neither TIME nor

What!? Neither TIME nor SEXUALITY "after death"!?
I'm genuinely flabbergasted *donje*: ... "only temporal", sexuality "completely irrelevant after death" ...

What happens to Sabbath Time? (PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE read Heschel's wonderful little book of the same title).

And as for such a glib dismissal of sexuality, oh dear, oh dear, oh dear; not only do I agree with Frannie that the gift of our sexuality is the ground of love and thus, for me at any rate, a sacred and indelible aspect of the soul, but it is also, quite possibly, the ground of Joy. NOTHING is more intimately connected to my experience of the abundance of an incarnate life in Christ, for me, than the pleasure, grace, comfort, nurture, surprise, transcendence, and genuine capacity to share than is the sexual communion with my beloved.

Time and Sexuality ... Why/How could anyone fail to treasure the seemingly eternal and fundamental Truths of this dual grace I ask myself! And yet, here it is.

Oh m'gosh!!!

The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy

"Arise, shine; for your light has come, and the glory of the LORD has risen upon you. (Is 60:1)

Rated 4 by 6 users. see individual ratings

Sorry about that, but there

Sorry about that, but there will be no copulating in heaven; it's in the Book.

Not yet rated.

"Love yourself; God likes

"Love yourself; God likes you as you are. None of us are any happier for all the people who love us if we won't love ourselves."

Good God, I wish more people actually understood this not so simple statement.

By the way, I have it on good authority that God lets us keep whatever we want to keep upon crossing over, but that if we haven't gotten that oh so simple statement, we keep coming back until we do. :)

Rated 4 by 7 users. see individual ratings

I would embrace being

I would embrace being defined by my sexuality since it is the ground of all my loving and as a child of God that is my only call.

Rated 4 by 7 users. see individual ratings

donje~ What evidence do you

donje~ What evidence do you have that sexuality is "totally temporal and completely irrelevant after death". I am not disparaging you but was of the opinion that my full humanness will be expressed as integral to my person in eternity. Certainly any sexual stereotypes or "hangups" will be resolved and I expect therefore that we will all be more, say, androgenous.
There will be no marriage, according to scripture as I recall reading somewhere but that does not exclude sexuality. Quite honestly, if you have references I would appreciate them.

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

Sexuality serves two

Sexuality serves two functions: Procreative and Unitive; it guarantees to continuance of the human race; it brings husband and wife together in a unique, beautiful, committed loving relationship.
In life after the end of the world there will be no need to continue the human race, and in heaven, the infused love of God in each person will bind us together in a unity, stronger that sex ever could, hence no need of sex.
And won't that be grand. I picture it as knowing everyone who ever existed on a first-name basis and loving each as a best friend.

Not yet rated.

I had precisely the same

I had precisely the same question that Dennis has, donje.

I suppose I had always thought that when we go to God at the end of our journey, we go to God as just ourselves--ourselves stripped of all devices and desires that have kept us from being one with God (and one with ourselves).

If sexual orientation is part of each human being's makeup (and increasing scientific evidence suggests this), then don't we go to God as we are: gay or straight?

To me, this eschatological recognition that we return to God claiming and celebrating who we are, as gifts from God's hands, dovetails with your statement, "Love yourself; God likes you as you are. None of us are any happier for all the people who love us if we won't love ourselves."

To me, this implies that part of the human task is to learn to love the person God has made us to be. If that's true, then it seems rather sad (not to say, cruel and even unholy) when social and ecclesial institutions thwart the ability of some folks to celebrate, claim, rejoice in, and express the depths of their unique personhood.

I've always liked the cult of the saints in that it reminds us that all of us have a chance, potentially, to reach God. Look at the canon of saints, and you'll find every type in the world. We venerate the saints precisely because they bring their very particular human nature to God at the end of their life's journey, and in doing so, provide models for human beings in all their diversity.

I'm also puzzled by your statement to Cashelguy, "I presume you feel a need to defend the Gay subculture."

Why on earth would anyone conclude that, based on what Cashelguy said? If you mean by "gay subculture" the tawdrier fringes of gay culture, then should one ask each person who defends heterosexuality as desirable whether the person is also defending the "straight subculture"?

Unless I'm mistaken, one can find just about any tawdry variant of human sexual expression as readily in the straight subculture as in the gay subculture. But no one seems quick to equate heterosexuality with the tawdry fringes of its own erotic subculture.

Does it strike you as possibly unfair--or even malicious--to try to raise specters of "subcultural" practices every time one mentions the word gay? Newspapers are quick to tag a murder in which a gay man kills another a gay murder. But I seem to find sad accounts almost daily in my paper of a man killing his wife or vice versa.

Yet I never see these (far more common) sad events tagged as "another heterosexual killing."

William D. Lindsey

Rated 4 by 8 users. see individual ratings

Your criticism of my

Your criticism of my "defending the gay subculture" is well taken, which, I guess, again proves that I'm a sinner. Lord have mercy. And thanks for your comment

Rated 4 by 2 users. see individual ratings