National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

Catholics must walk carefully in Kenya's political crisis

 Print Friendly Version
 All Things Catholic by John L. Allen, Jr.
  Friday, Jan. 26, 2007 - Vol. 7, No. 17  

Kenya's current slide into ethnic violence, which so far has generated 100,000 refugees and left more than 300 dead, ought to be a subject of grave concern for global Christianity, and not just for the obvious humanitarian and geostrategic reasons. In a real sense, nothing less than the destiny of Christianity in the 21st century is at stake.

Trackers of Christian trends have long prophesied that the next 100 years should shape up as an "African Century," given the enormous explosion in the continent's Christian population. In the 20th century, sub-Saharan Africa went from fewer than 8 million Christians to an estimated 360 million. Buoyed by that missionary and demographic energy, African Christianity is emerging as a protagonist in church affairs to a degree not seen since the age of Augustine, with the starring role played by African prelates in the ongoing crisis within Anglicanism merely the most obvious case in point.

Painting in broad strokes, Christianity in Africa tends to be youthful, vigorous, rooted solidly in the Bible rather than abstract theology, blending deep spiritual convictions with keen political and social engagement, and perhaps most beguiling of all, largely uncontaminated by the ideological polarization familiar in Western theological debate. Contrary to popular impression, African Christianity is not uniformly "conservative," which is a Western taxonomy, but often an intriguing blend of Biblical literalism with progressive social reform. The dream is that dynamic African Christians might reinvigorate the faith in other parts of the world.

For African Christianity to fulfill that potential, however, it will have to come to terms with the contagion of tribalism.

Hence the importance of Kenya, a nation of 37 million people that's roughly 78 percent Christian, with one-third Catholic and the rest spread among a wide variety of Evangelical, Pentecostal, Mainline Protestant and African Initiated Churches. Kenyan Christianity has produced an impressive share of global leaders. The general secretary of the World Council of Churches, the chief umbrella group for global Protestantism, is a Kenyan Methodist, Rev. Samuel Kobia. Pope Benedict XVI recently named the Archbishop of Nairobi, John Njue, as one of just nine African voting cardinals. Anglican Archbishop Benjamin Nzimbi of Kenya is among the leaders of the traditionalist wing of his church; some 30 American congregations have broken away from the Episcopal Church in the United States, because of its pro-homosexual stance, to affiliate with Nzimbi's Anglican Church of Kenya.

Kenya is also one of the economic and political powerhouses of the continent, with the best infrastructure, communications networks and educational systems in East Africa. Most multinational companies, non-governmental organizations and media outlets that operate anywhere in East Africa choose to set up shop in Nairobi, making Kenya both physically and psychologically far more integrated with the rest of the world than any other country in the region.

If Christianity can't make a stand here, it's a fair question what hope it might have anywhere else.

To date, the evidence is not encouraging. On Wednesday, Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu volunteered to help mediate the standoff between the government of President Mwai Kubaki, which is backed by his Kikuyu tribe, and the opposition "Orange Democratic Movement" led by Raila Odinga, a member of the Luo people. While there are 42 distinct ethnic groups in Kenya, the Kikuyu, who represent an estimated 13 percent of the population, have tended to dominate political and economic sectors, breeding resentment among other groups.

What's noteworthy about Tutu's intervention, however welcome it may be, is that no Christian leader in Kenya apparently has sufficient moral stature to bring the parties together. That's especially troubling given the proud history of church leaders in Kenya, with Catholics in the front line, of rallying civil society during the authoritarian regime of Daniel Arap Moi.

In this crisis, however, some Christian leaders appear to have inadvertently exacerbated divisions. In perhaps the most prominent example, Njue has twice expressed opposition to the Kenyan concept of Majimbo, referring to a sort of federalist politics in which the country's regions would gain power at the expense of the central government. Majimbo has been the rallying cry of Odinga's opposition movement, and in the context of Dec. 27 national elections Njue's statement was read as an indirect endorsement of Kubaki, a Catholic. (Odinga describes himself as an Anglican, though some allege he's not exactly practicing.)

Njue's intent, backed by the majority of the bishops' conference, clearly was to defend national unity. Here's how he explained it in a late October press conference in Nairobi:

"What the country needs now is to be a united nation, and for Kenyans to have a sense of belonging," Njue said. "As the Catholic church, we do not support any particular party, but we have to go by those principles we see are valid for the wellbeing of the nation. We think it would be disastrous if we were to move in that direction. I think we need to help our people mature and to get that spirit of unity."

Njue is not the only Christian leader to express reservations about Majimbo. The Rev. Wellington Mutiso, chair of the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, also opposes it, saying "The unitary system is best, because as Kenyans we have a major problem with ethnicity, as we are so tribal."

Yet Njue's statements in particular, perhaps because of his cachet of being a new cardinal, seem to have fed ethnic tension. One Protestant leader close to the Orange Democratic Movement called Njue "a mouthpiece of Kikuyu tribes in the Catholic church in Kenya," and a leading Kenyan columnist referred to the statements as a major "goof." (For the record, Njue is not a Kikuyu, but a member of the small Embu tribe.) At least one brother Catholic bishop distanced himself from Njue; Archbishop Zacchaeus Okoth of Kisumu said Njue's position was not binding on Catholics, noting that it had not been expressed in a pastoral letter. (Here, too, some sense the tug of tribalism. Kisumu is overwhelmingly Luo, and a strong base of support for Odinga.)

Perceptions of a partisan stand have been exacerbated by the fact that Odinga signed a "memorandum of understanding" with a Muslim association, creating fears of religious division on top of existing tribal fractures. The Kenyan bishops issued a critical statement about the deal from Rome during their mid-November ad limina visit to the pope, warning that "granting special religious favors during campaign time is wrong."

However justified these interventions have been, the plain political fact is that in a truly free and fair election, Odinga would almost certainly have prevailed, and Njue and the Catholic bishops are now perceived by many of his supporters as part of the opposition. Their challenge thus is to project a model of civic-mindedness, open to all parties and concerned for the common good.

African Christians are certainly capable of it. One thinks, for example, of the famous Christmas sermon delivered in 2005 by Archbishop John Onaiyekan of Abuja, Nigeria, in the presence of then-President Olusegun Obasanjo. Onaiyekan urged Obasanjo to prepare democratic elections in 2007 rather than scrapping the constitution so he could claim a third term. Onaiyekan cleverly crafted his remarks as praise, expressing confidence the president would "resist the deadly temptation to want to remain in power perpetually by hook or by crook," but the message was clear. Obasanjo was said to have fumed privately, but eventually he relented.

Onaiyekan's message had credibility, and not simply because Obasanjo is a Christian in a country where the political class has traditionally been dominated by Muslims, so most people would have expected Onaiyekan to blindly support a Christian president. Onaiyekan also hails from Yoruba country, the same tribe to which Obasanjo belongs. Onaiyekan's willingness to set aside tribal logic in order to speak for all Nigerians was thus impressive, and potentially decisive in laying the basis for a peaceful transition of power -- albeit in elections that most observers regarded as flawed.

While addressing the Kenyan crisis is primarily something for Njue and other local leaders to figure out, Christians around the world can at least express solidarity loudly and clearly, letting Kenyans know that the world is watching. Doing so is not merely a matter of protesting the oblivion to which Africa is routinely consigned, but it's also a recognition that our common Christian future is at stake.

On a trip to Kenya three years ago, I happened to be a dinner guest at the residence of the then-Archbishop of Nairobi, Raphael Ndingi Mwana a'Nzeki. Now 76 and retired, Ndingi carries the stately bearing of an African elder. While he's listed in the Vatican's Annuario as 76, in truth he doesn't know precisely how old he is; there were no birth certificates issued in the bush, but when he was baptized the parish clerk said he looked about 14, and that's how it went on the books.

That night we dined on a leisurely meal of traditional African dishes, with just enough Western-style entrees that I didn't feel completely adrift. Afterwards we retired to Ndingi's living room to sip wine and watch the local evening news. After one especially bombastic politico was interviewed, Ndingi expressed disagreement.

"But, Your Grace," one of the other clerics in the room playfully chided, "that man is from your people." (Ndingi is from the Akamba, an ethnic group concentrated in the eastern part of Kenya.)

"It makes no difference," Ndingi snorted. "Dishonesty doesn't belong to a tribe."

That's a sentiment that merits prayer, and whatever forms of active support the global Christian community can muster.

  ArchivesSignup for Weekly E-mail  
The e-mail address for John L. Allen Jr. is jallen@ncronline.org

"What is concerning is that

"What is concerning is that the Catholic episcopal and clerical ranks are divided - sometimes by the actual tribal divisions that are creating this chaos. And again, the real suffering is endured by the poor, those living in slums, and those with economic, health, and educational difficulties."

The best anecdotal tale I can recall that demonstrates the unrealistic fear and prejudices that accompany Africa's tribal divisions involves an experience I had in Nigeria back in the late 1980s.

I was traveling from Lagos to Maiduguri via Kano, Nigeria on my way to visit my company's water pump manufacturing plant there for which I was the financial controller. I was traveling with a guest of my company's Nigeria partner. This guest happened to be a Nigerian civil servant and Ambassador to Venezuela. The Ambassador was on his way to be feted by our partner and several of wealthy businessmen friends, who had met the him while traveling in Venezuela where he treated them "royally" and they vowed to reciprocate in the homes.

The Ambassador was a sophisticated chap, educated in the US and Europe and a true gentlemen. He was also an Igbo (the Biafrans of the Biafran Civil War), and a Christian. (The main Tribal divisions in Nigeria fall along three greater tribal lines - these include the Igbo in Southeast Nigeria who mostly Christian; the Yoruba of Western and Southern Nigeria who are a mixture of Islamic, Christian, and Animist; and the Hausa/Fulani of the North who largely Moslem.) The Igbo make the greater part of the Civil Servants of Nigeria having been closely related to the English Colonist - they basically make the "trains run on time" (although seldom do) in Nigeria.

As we traveled together, the Ambassador confided to me that he was terribly afraid of traveling to the Hausa/Fulani area of Northern Nigeria, a place where never visited. He indicated that his fear went back to his children where he learned to hate and fear the Hausa/Fulani with legends that included stories of the Northern tribal killing and eating captive Igbo children. I can vouch that his fear was real.

I accompanied this man through most of his Maiduguri feting, and I can report that these Moslem businessmen went "all out" make their guest feel welcomed and to enjoy his stay. In fact, at the dinners and luncheons held in the Ambassador's honor these mostly devout Moslems had served alcoholic beverages so that their Christian guest would "feel at home". That alone was truly amazing.

I believe this anecdotal story gives some favor to the terrible inter-tribal fears and prejudices that are experienced in many parts of Africa. With events, such as the Rwandan slaughter, one can understand the difficulties the multi-tribal African countries have trying select and respect a unified National Government.

Aside: Maiduguri, Nigeria is in Borno State, an area of Northeastern Nigeria dominated by the Kanuri Tribe, who were long enemies of the Hausa/Fulanis. It seems as though Islam came to the Kanuri Tribe via Chad and Sudan, as oppose to through the Sokoto Caliphate. In the religious civil war that took place in the early 1800s, the Sultan of Sokoto was never able to conquer the Kanuri people and Bornu Empire. This is perhaps why the Borno State region has the reputation as being the hardest area in all Nigeria for the national government to administer.

Not yet rated.

I found that the despute,

I found that the despute, apparently over the Kenyan concept of Majimbo, or a federalism along tribal lines, to be quite fascination. This is especially so when you consider that most of Africa's problems can be directly related to the fact that virtually all of Africa's countries have been setup not along "traditional" tribal lines, but by European colonialists, without regards to ethnic, cultural, or religious differences.

The bloody civil war in Nigeria ("Biafran War") and the bloody genocide in Rwanda are directly related to this historic fact. Despite the obvious inferiority of the present geopolitical situation in most African countries, their former colonial rulers are reluctant to allow them to divide along these ethnic/tribal lines.

Interesting, it seems that it is only Africa that the European powers insist on "unity" of existing states, as they definitely encourages the breakup of Yugoslava along ethnic lines. Is there a reason why the former colonialist prefer the civil unrest they created when drawing up the "political" map of Africa?

While breaking up the countries of Africa along tribal lines might be the answer to stopping the "ethnic" based "power struggles" that are the root of most African violence, it might not be practical in every case, such as in Kenya with its 42 seperate ethnic tribes. In such a case a possible practical alternative might just be the "Majimbo" mentioned in the article.

In fact, such a solution was successfully adapted in Europe by the Swiss, where 3 destinct ethnic/religious groups ended years of bloody civil war by agreeing to form a "federal government" that divided authority with 3 seperate "Cantons" (States) that reserved the power over local societal and cultural regulation, while placing control over foreign policy and national security in a central government (not unlike that of United States). Since the government of Switzerland was "federalized", the country has been internally at peace and has enjoyed a prosperity which is the envy of most other European countries.

Possibly the country of Kenya could reform its government and establish a constitutional Federal system that recognizes ethnical autonomy in cultural/religious matters and still retains the advantages of a central government in matters of foreign policy, trade and national defense. If Kenya could successful pull this off, perhaps it might be become an example to help the rest of Africa solve it violent ethnic/cultural/religious problems.

Rated 4 by 4 users. see individual ratings

It is interesting to read

It is interesting to read the US media reports about this situation and then compare this to written e-mails coming from friends that staff Catholic social and academic centers in Kenya. The best quote I have seen is:

"Kibaki looks like the villain in all of this. But both Raila and Kibaki are equally to blame because neither has made any serious attempt to do anything to put an end to this violence that is tearing Kenya apart. If last week’s ballot only had three choices: a) Kibaki; b.) Raila or c) neither of the above, maybe a majority would have chosen “c”. Neither of these candidates is the man who should be leading Kenya. As Dr. Martin Luther King once said: “The ultimate measure of a person is not where they stand in moments of comfort and convenience, but where they stand at times of challenge and controversy.” Raila tried to organize a million man march to the centre of Nairobi. The government stopped him. The country is overrun with thieves, thugs and criminals that are just thriving on all this mayhem. There’s no immediate or even long term solution that’s being considered so this insanity will be with us for days/weeks to come."

What is concerning is that the Catholic episcopal and clerical ranks are divided - sometimes by the actual tribal divisions that are creating this chaos. And again, the real suffering is endured by the poor, those living in slums, and those with economic, health, and educational difficulties.

Rated 4 by 2 users. see individual ratings

In trying to get some

In trying to get some perspective on "tribalism" I remember the dismay I felt in the '40s when students from Indianapolis brought with them the animosities from back home: coming from Irish, German, and Italian parishes.
At a luncheon recently, in talking with a Black activist and quoting something from Thomas Sowell, she said: I don't read him; he's conservative--a US version of tribalism?
As Sowell mentions in his excellent book, Black Rednecks and White Liberals, national/family groups have always tended to see the non-member as the outsider and the enemy.
Has there ever been a religion, other than Christianity, with an agenda of helping these disparate groups see themselves as brothers and sisters and with the insistence that Christianity proposes in the "Our Father?" May the Christian churches in Africa prevail.

Not yet rated.