The American Empire and Its Eventual Demise
The United States has had an empire for a long time. Despite all the public relations, empires exist only to benefit the rulers. Chalmers Johnson presents evidence for his conclusions in Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic. The American Empire has 5 global military commands, more than one million women and men on four continents, has a carrier battle group in each ocean, guarantees the survival of regimes in Iraq, South Korea and Israel and dominates the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.
The US Defense Department’s 2005 Base Structure Report shows 737 military bases in foreign countries. With no given reason, the Report omits bases in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Kyrgyzstan, Qatar and Uzbekistan.
Forty percent of the defense budget and the entire intelligence budget are secret to all but a handful of sympathetic congressmen. The result is an out of-control military complex with intelligence agencies controlled exclusively by the President.
The Central Intelligence Agency’s enabling legislation did not list clandestine or covert activities that became the CIA’s main activity. Senator Frank Church’s described “covert action” as a “semantic disguise for murder, coercion, blackmail, bribery, the spreading of lies, and consorting with known torturers and international terrorists.” The CIA clandestine operations have worked to manipulate or undermine democratic governments. Its operations were essential in overthrowing democratic governments in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954) and Chile (1973).
The CIA has been defective in gathering intelligence. My feeling is that the CIA purposely inflated the military and economic might of the old Soviet Union to justify their expanded budget along that of the US armed forces. In 1989, I was reading about the obvious deterioration of the Soviet Army in the German news magazine Der Spiegel. The American media was totally oblivious of this development. During the Reagan administration, Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger stated that the Soviet Union had massive underground shelters ready to protect their citizens in a nuclear war. This was part of an effort to justify massive spending for a US Star Wars program. The underground shelters were probably all Soviet propaganda with no basis in fact. No one has even seen these shelters.
In 2003, the US intelligence agencies did not have a single agent in Iraq. Rather they relied on information from con men like Ahmad Chalabi. Critics have noted the notorious deficiency of having field agents over many decades.
The United States has exempted itself from international laws in Iraq and our political and military leaders are liable for war crimes. Article 54 (2) of the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1) states, “It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as food-stuffs, agricultural areas for the production of food-stuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies, irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, or cause them to move away, or for any other motive.” During the Gulf War of 1991, the United States purposely destroyed the civilian infrastructure, including 18 of 20 electricity-generating plants, water-pumping and sanitation systems which caused the outbreak of disease and high rates of child mortality.
The embargo imposed on Iraq after the Gulf War was one of the most comprehensive in history. It prohibited chorine imports that would purify the water supply. Among numerous items that the United States prohibited from entering Iraq in the winter of 2001 were dialysis, dental and firefighting equipment, water tankers, milk and yogurt production equipment, and printing machines for schools.
All empires state that the people they control are getting a good deal. The Bush administration maintained that the US was bringing democracy to Iraq. Imperialists have always stated a higher purpose to their actions – divine right, racial superiority, manifest destiny, bringing Christianity or a ”civilizing mission’ to mask barbarous behavior in other countries. Most of these defenses have been out of fashion for a long time. Modern day imperialists tout the benefits of globalization, free trade, the rule of (foreign) law, liberation from a local tyranny or democracy that are code words for exploitation of poor countries.
Almost all the countries under imperialistic rule in the 19th and 20th centuries remained “poor, disease- and crime-ridden, and at the mercy of a rigged international trading system” that was supposed to work to everyone’s advantage. Between 1747 and 1947, India’s per capita income was flat. In the second half of Queen Victoria’s reign, British misrule brought on famines and plagues that took the lives of 30 to 50 million Indians.
The British have been successful that they were totally different from the French, Belgians, Dutch, Japanese, Germans and Russians. Those who read novels or watch the television series Masterpiece Theater have the idea that they were “decent chaps”. The Kenyans would be surprised at this image. When they rebelled against ruthless land seizures by British settlers, the British detained, tortured, sodomized, castrated and executed thousands. Imperialists’ defenders do not research the feelings of those ruled.
Chalmers Johnson sees a solution: “A grassroots movement to abolish the CIA, break the hold of the military-industrial complex, and establish public financing of elections.” Due to corporate control of the media and the difficulties of organizing a large diffuse population, he does not think this will happen.
The United States’ efforts to maintain an empire has diminished its domestic democracy eventually resulting in a military dictatorship or a softer, gentler civilian equivalent. What the Reichstag fire was to Nazi Germany, the 9/11 event was to the Bush Administration.
Johnson believes that “...the combination of huge standing armies, almost continuous wars, military Keynesianism, and ruinous military expenses have destroyed our republican structure in favor of an imperial presidency.” All previous empires have collapsed because of hubris and overstretch. Ours is no exception.
Ed O’Rourke is an environmental accountant in Houston.
eorourke@pdq.net
www.edourke.com
713-664-4343
Wouldn't it be wonderful:
Wouldn't it be wonderful: if our founding fathers were the generous, selfless, idealistic saints often pictured in our grade school textbooks; if 19th century American history was steeped in respect for human rights for all peoples "created equal"; if American policy of the twentieth century was unsullied by colonial ambition, corporate greed, the depredations of the military industrial complex; and the twenty-first century was begun with selfless brotherly love?
Unfortunately, the founding fathers were as ambitious as any other scoundrels at large in their century. For proof of this we just have to look at their endorsement of slavery, the continued suppression of women and the unpropertied poor legally, politically, economically, and socially, the violent seizure of land owned by native peoples along with a savage ethnic cleansing of the frontier lands.
The nineteenth century was no golden age for American foreign policy with land grabbing wars against the Spanish and the Mexicans to say nothing of the systematic military slaughter of dozens of native tribes. Did not this behavior foreshadow the ruthless savagery of the Soviets and the Nazi Third Reich? But of course, we are morally superior to these godless ideologues.
In the twentieth century the freedom loving American government continued its long struggle to control Latin America by installing and supporting various tyrants in exchange for control of resources, cheap agricultural labor and market monopolies. We eagerly joined the European Allies in their WW I struggle for colonial supremacy in Africa and Asia only to face the bitter reaction of the Germans to the unjust terms of the Versailles treaty. This situation was repeated in our betrayal of the Vietnamese by putting them back under the heel of France only to face war with them ourselves when they attempted to achieve their own freedom first from France and then from the USA.
The greed, savagery, militancy, ambition for empire, scorn for the rule of law and human rights that we see in the present American policies have a long precedent in our American history from the 18th to the 21st centuries. Let's take off the blinders and face the facts of our own history. What we see happening today should be seen with humility as an opportunity to break from the past and to finally act with the nobility which we have in the past failed to achieve.
I would like to see a
I would like to see a return to the type of foreign policy this nation had before the 20th century. We have forgotten President Washington's wise counsel to avoid entangling alliances. (This is not to say that we should never get involved in conflicts outside of our borders...WWII being a perfect example). Yes, we should use our influence to positively influence the growth of human rights, democracy, and economic well being. However, we should no longer take on the role of the global policeman. There are a lot of terrible regimes across the globe. Yet, it would be foolish to constantly intervene militarily in order to do away with them. This type of foreign policy would only result in the deaths of our brave serviceman and woman, drain our tresury, and make us an object of hatred and resentment among the nations of the world. One need only look at our foolishness in invading Iraq to see an example of this kind of interventionist foreign policy in action.
However, to those Americans whose palms get sweaty in anticipation of the collaps of the "American Empire", take heed. An American collapse will result in a period of disorder not seen since the end of the Western Roman Empire. Some possible scenarios include: war on the Korean penisula; a much larger war between Shia and Sunni across the entire Middle East; another round of Arab/Israeli wars; an arms race in Asia; a Chinese invasion of Taiwan; and possible Russian bullying of her neighbors in Eastern Europe.
The U.S. should disengage from these regions, but gradually so as not to create a sudden power vacuum. Otherwise, people may look back at the early 21st century as "the good old days".
At lunch today at work, we
At lunch today at work, we discussed the current USA foreign policy and the way it depends on behaviors totally out of line with the values in our founding documents.
When you describe the armies of occupation we have throughout the world I am sad. The lives of young military personnel are spent for world domination instead of for the discovery of the marvels of life and love. The wounded and the dead military personnel from Iraq and Afghanistan will reveal to the next generations the folly this preventive war. Children without parents, parents with wounded children: this pain must be allowed to speak to our nation so that all war everywhere becomes a thing of the past.
You speak of the demise of the empire, and first we think of Rome being overrun by barbarians. In this new day however, I see the empire giving its power over to the corporations. (I am thinking of the trading agreements where communities cannot decide not to have polluting industry because they can no longer restrict free trade?) These multinational and intercontinental bodies are merging and growing faster than a batch of bunnies. They have their own intelligence corps and their own armies. (I am thinking of Blackwater, the book.) In spite of the profiteering every war has, it is my prayer that these corporations will see that killing off a people, any people, is not in their best interest.
Thanks again for getting me started.
Sister Zelda
Peace and Good, Isn't our
Peace and Good,
Isn't our system self correcting? As long as the peaceful transfer of power happens at each election wont these things iron out over time?
Your Brother in Christ (Franciscan Tertiary of Mary, Mother of the Most Blessed Sacrament)
It would be nice if these
It would be nice if these things didn't have to 'self correct' because the 'self correction' employed by our intelligence agencies has been less than edifying, and they do a superb job of blocking the oversight capabilities of the respective senate and house bodies assigned that task. In some cases even the current president isn't given all the information on given projects.
Last week's issue of the NCR carried a review of the book Mind Wars. In the review was mentioned the MKULTRA project and the associated BLUEBIRD project. Because of professional interests involving a couple of clients with Dissasociative Personality Disorder, I had reason to research the available data on these very secret projects. I was stunned to find out these programs, which were truly Satanic, were maintained in secrecy for 30 some years until the bookkeeping records were found in cardboard boxes in some long forgetten warehouse.
Reading the transcripts of the intelligence committee hearings where these projects were finally discussed leaves one stupefied. In the case of black ops, 'self correcting' only happens if they forget to destroy all the records. What's been done in the interests of National Security should make all Americans take a look at what they truly want from their government.
One of the more interesting and frightening things about the MKULTRA project was that it employed scientists, psychiatrists, psycholigists and intelligence personel from Canada, England, and the US, and some of these gentlemen were pantheons in their respective fields. As with most black ops projects, they were isolated from each other and the over all scheme. Although MKULTRA involved a number of different things, project BLUEBIRD existed to make the perfect assassin and intelligence agent--a person with multiple personalities whose different personalities were trained in different intelligence techniques and unknown to the host personality. It was a sick and twisted program which left lots of human wreckage, in that the training and the splitting off of alternate personalities was begun very early in a child's life and almost always involved cult ritual and sexual abuse.
There's an innocent part of me which wishes I had never done this research. Sometimes ignorance truly is bliss.
Without presuming to offer
Without presuming to offer judgments on US politics, there is much truth in yours statement about "system self correcting". It it the "in the meantime" people who become the "consequentials" or more correctly the "inconsequentials", whom I weep for.







Our 'fretful, theatrical
Our 'fretful, theatrical piety': FYI:
"Like Bonhoeffer, I fear that the gospel has been humiliated in our time. But if this has happened, it is not because the message -- the good news that God loves us unconditionally in Jesus Christ, that we are freed and forgiven in God's amazing grace -- has changed. Nor is it due to the machinations of secularists, or because the post-Enlightenment world has dispensed with the hypothesis of God. The Christian faith has not only endured modernity and post-modernity, but flourished in its new settings.
The gospel has been humiliated because too many American Christians have decided that there are more important things to talk about. We would rather talk about our country, our values, our troops, and our way of life; and although we might think we are paying tribute to God when we speak of these other things, we are only flattering ourselves.
If only holiness were measured by the volume of our incessant chatter, we would be universally praised as the most holy nation on earth. But in our fretful, theatrical piety, we have come to mistake noisiness for holiness, and we have presumed to know, with a clarity and certitude that not even the angels dared claim, the divine will for the world. We have organized our needs with the confidence that God is on our side, now and always, whether we feed the poor or corral them into ghettos."
Go to:
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/07/08/god_and_country?mode=PF
for the July 8th original article by Charles Marsh from UVa.
The Rev. Dr. E. McCoy
"All who are led by the Spirit of God are children of God. For you did not receive a spirit of slavery to fall back into fear..." (Romans 8:14-15)