National Catholic Reporter    
 
Go to Search The center for the Catholic conversation... shaping the lives of 21st century Catholics

New Search for Ultimate Reality

NCRcafe New Search DISCUSSION Number TEN June 2007

ANOTHER CALL TO ACTION

The Journey from Belief to Knowledge

If we are moving from an originally functional evolutionary way of belief to a contemporarily functional evolutionary way of seeking knowledge, then specifically what does that mean? Let’s take one example.

Scholarship Trumps

If Christianity is a fantasy faith founded on mythology or a discrete cultural input of past age beliefs, then update or replacement is required. We have seen two recent examples in Sheehan’s article and Dupre’s response letter of the serious need for replacement of certain Christian beliefs. There are many other sources in the enterprise of biblical scholarship that clearly manifest the need for revision. Robert Funk’s The Acts of Jesus is a prime example. (The Jesus Seminar of which Funk was a founding member makes biblical scholarship available to the general public.)

But unfortunately the Roman Catholic Church’s hierarchical structure and its required indoctrination do not enable the intellectual freedom for the average Catholic even after the groundbreaking days of Vatican II! Nevertheless, if one reads the literature at large, one has to move beyond Vatican II to examining Catholicism from an outsider’s viewpoint, rather than from an insider’s viewpoint, even a liberal insider’s viewpoint. Such a change in perspective has a predictable consequence. One understands that authoritarian control of responsible intellectual freedom does not respect our species’ better attributes – revealing another example of the dysfunction of Axial Age religions.

Here’s a place where there is a basic need for revision. There is historical evidence to persuade a believer to acknowledge the heavily weighted probability (and it is rational to choose the stronger probability) that there was no Incarnation and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Consequently, the bedrock of Christianity disappears. The Incarnation as the initiation of Redemption and the Resurrection as its culmination are the foundations of Christianity. Everything else has been added on as theological church building. As mentioned earlier, we can still call it Christianity, though deprived of its foundations and do with it what we want; but without its foundations we “-- build theological castles in the air--” to borrow a phrase of the late Arthur Peacocke, biochemist and Anglican theologian. There’s no edifice without a foundation.

As an afterthought, on the one hand, often enough we base life choices on probabilities because certainty and evidence are not always available. But on the other hand, often enough there are times when we must and do have enough certainty and evidence to exercise our responsibilities. C’est la vie.

Reasons for Christianity Having Run Its Course

Why such a transformation in thinking after roughly 2000 years? Three of the reasons are biblical and other historical scholarship, scientific advances, and the application of epistemological (theory of knowledge) competence. Let’s focus on biblical scholarship resources for now.

Discussion #2 mentioned some of the biblical scholarship. Reading Funk’s book, for me, was “an inverse conversion experience.” Since his recent death, the Weststar Institute in Santa Rosa, California transmits his scholarly torch. The Fellows and Associates carry their own fire but have no monopoly on the enterprise. (Consult, for instance, the work of The Society of Biblical Literature, examples of similar work.)

The Journey from Belief to Knowledge Needs a Fast-Track Technology

I’m not trying to be inordinately injudicious. But I believe that the sooner we set aside a PAST age’s fictional faith and embrace a PRESENT age’s reality-based faith in human knowledge and skill in working together en masse to save ourselves and our fellow planetary creatures, the quicker we’ll have a more guaranteed preferred FUTURE.

Determining what the “faith” of a Post Axial Age ought to be requires more time and further discussion. So let’s postpone that discussion in the light of planet Earth’s emergency situation and consider what we should do. Spending our time and energy to meet the crisis ought to be our highest priority. We are losing our planet rapidly! Almost every day gives us more indication of the losses.

For example, consider this Netscape Report (05/17/07) of Michael McCarthy’s article Earth’s Natural Defenses Against Climate Change ‘Beginning to Fail’. (The Independent, May 18, 2007) “The earth's ability to soak up the gases causing global warming is beginning to fail because of rising temperatures, in a long-feared sign of "positive feedback," new research reveals today. Climate change itself is weakening one of the principal "sinks" absorbing carbon dioxide - the Southern Ocean around Antarctica - a new study has found. As a result, atmospheric CO2 levels may rise faster and bring about rising temperatures more quickly than previously anticipated. Stabilising the CO2 level, which must be done to bring the warming under control, is likely to become much more difficult, even if the world community agrees to do it. The news may give added urgency to the meeting in three weeks' time between the G8 group of rich nations and the leading developing countries led by China, at Heiligendamm in Germany, when an attempt will be made to put together the framework of a new world climate treaty to succeed the current Kyoto protocol. “

Another source, (Reuters, Netscape Report, 05/22/07) demonstrates that THERE IS CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT WE ARE WELL INTO THE SIXTH MASS EXTINCTION SINCE LIFE BEGAN ON EARTH. How massive the extinction may be is entirely up to us! A discussion in Wikipedia provides a mathematical formulation of what the Reuters article was saying with stark, concrete facts. Significantly, the rate of species extinctions at present is estimated at 100 to 1000 times "background" or average extinction rates in the evolutionary time scale of planet Earth; moreover, this current rate of extinction is thus 10 to 100 times greater than any of the prior mass extinction events in the history of the Earth. If this rate of extinction continues or accelerates, the number of species becoming extinct in the next decade could number in the millions. While most people readily relate to endangerment of large mammals or birdlife, some of the greatest ecological issues are the threats to stability of whole ecosystems, if key species vanish at any level of the food chain. After the Wikipedia search, I came across reams of material on extinction on the Internet.

Fortunately world governments are pledging to try to slow down the loss of biodiversity by 2010 (From another Internet source). So let us take heart people. This would be a great area for ecological work possibilities. Speaking of such, now for some more good news.

Knowledge to Action ---Fast Track!

Paul Hawken’s book Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming (New York: Viking Press, 2007) foresees a worldwide grassroots movement of hope and humanity. But why would no one see it coming? I think because it’s so obvious. Hawken describes a convergence of the environmental and social justice movements as the largest social and fastest growing movement in history comprising over one million organizations in every country in the world. Hawken’s book coincides with the May 2007 launch of a website, Wiser Earth, an open source social network with a database of more than 100, 000 organizations. How’s that for job possibilities? We are in tune with Hawken that the world is changing from one created by privilege (top down) to one created by community (bottom up).

So one needs to pick the niche that fits with his or her individual creative abilities, talents and gifts. Then we need to network, link hands with our friends and go for it! As Vault beverage would say – get to it! As Nike would say – just do it! Our world’s children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and on down the line -- as well as the planet’s other -- living and non-living creatures -- await our efforts to liberate them from dangers of the precarious twenty-first century that we have created. That liberation should start now as a part of a post-Axial Age faith and a continuation of yesteryear’s great feats for people and planet!

Vote Result --- Rating of 1:lowest and 10:highest for usefulness to community.
Score: 10.0, Votes: 1

RE: If Christianity is a

RE: If Christianity is a fantasy faith founded on mythology or a discrete cultural input of past age beliefs, then update or replacement is required. We have seen two recent examples in Sheehan’s article and Dupre’s response letter of the serious need for replacement of certain Christian beliefs. There are many other sources in the enterprise of biblical scholarship that clearly manifest the need for revision. Robert Funk’s The Acts of Jesus is a prime example. (The Jesus Seminar of which Funk was a founding member makes biblical scholarship available to the general public.)

That's exactly why update or replacement is NOT required. That's NOT what Christianity is founded on. That's why this entire series, in my view, has been a rather fallacious, strawman argument. I think this series has been very useful, though, insofar as it represents many widely held misconceptions.

From the conclusion of _The Bodily Resurrection of Jesus_ By Jim ^ Tyra Arraj: "All this, however, does not and cannot compel us to believe any more than the seeing of Jesus during his life compelled people to believe in him. What we have done, hopefully, is to clear away the obstacles to our consideration of the invitation of faith."

This quote is from:
http://www.innerexplorations.com/catchtheomor/resurrecion.htm

Neither those believers, who primarily quest after the "historical" Jesus, nor those nonbelievers, who'd like to deconstruct Christianity's foundations altogether, get this.

Let me restate, more fully, whay I already posted.

Apparently, some think that our faith in God and belief in Jesus primarily derive from 1) empirical evidence for the resurrection, 2) eyewitness accounts 3) empty tombs and 4) Gospel miracle stories. Of course, these angles need to be properly considered, but one must go beyond the empirical, exegetical and historical to an encounter that is also eschatological and experiential.

And this is where both the so-called "liberal consensus" (within the Church) and the nihilistic voices of disbelief (outside the Church) miss the boat. Thus it is that they ignore some of the Church's central claims, failing to address some of its essential core convictions about our God-encounters.

Our [1] God-encounters are deeply intimate and profoundly personal [2], very much human, very much divine [3], and ultimately & powerfully efficacious in being utterly transformative [4]. Thus it is that the Holy Spirit, then and now, communicates life in our personal experiences of just such a transcendent energy. The Holy Spirit is why anyone, then or now, would say Jesus is Lord.

All of this entails, then, in a Word, theosis, other aspects of the Christian faith remaining necessary but not sufficient without it. In other words, the Resurrection Event is an inference that springs from a LOT more experiences, both then and now and yet to come, than many "historical Jesus questors" seem willing and/or able to take into account. In still other words: "Look around!" and, equally important, "Look inside!"

pax,
jb

[1] Mystical Body
[2] Abba
[3] Jesus
[4] Holy Spirit

Not yet rated.

rdp Remember what we know as

rdp

Remember what we know as fallible beings does require a leap of faith for the more we know the more we know that our knowledge is infinitesimally shallow when compared to Infinite knowledge. I know that the valence of chlorine is -2, but if electrons were bullets, I would not want to stand in the -1 valence ring. The electrons circling the chlorine nucleus traverse in and out of the -2 ring. Newton's laws of planetary motion explain much unless we try to understand the motion of the smaller planets. Newton could not know about the other gravitational forces that we calculate today. Tomorrow we will know more. Yes, indeed human knowledge takes a leap in faith!

Not yet rated.

You wrote "..the sooner we

You wrote "..the sooner we ...embrace... faith in human knowledge,...the quicker we’ll have a more guaranteed preferred FUTURE."

The expression "Faith in human knowledge" makes no sense because faith is related to belief rather than knowledge. People have knowledge about facts, theories, and history, for example, who do not have faith in a creator. Likewise, people who have faith in a creator may be educated or uneducated, and may be knowledgeable or ignorant about much of the world in which they live.

Of course, some among us are fortunate enough to be well educated, have a reasonably wide knowledge of the world about us, and have the gift of faith as well. If we have those characteristics, it is probably due to a combination of fortunate circumstances, the support and love of others, and hard work.

Then there's the matter of just what you may mean by a "...more guaranteed preferred future". As far as I know, there is no guarantee of any future, preferred or otherwise, except perhaps that we are sure to die one day.

As to institutuional religion, I'd suggest that it's best to distinguish between faith in a Creator and affiliation in a religious institution. Faith is primary, I say. If, or when, a religious institution becomes an impediment to faith, then set aside that impediment. When a religious institution supports and nourishes your journey of faith, then embrace it, or more particularly those who are its members, and dance together to the tune of the Creator who calls you forth in joy.

Mark G / California

Rated 4 by one user. see individual ratings

You wrote "..the sooner we

You wrote "..the sooner we ...embrace... faith in human knowledge,...the quicker we’ll have a more guaranteed preferred FUTURE."

The expression "Faith in human knowledge" makes no sense because faith is related to belief rather than knowledge. People have knowledge about facts, theories, and history, for example, who do not have faith in a creator. Likewise, people who have faith in a creator may be educated or uneducated, and may be knowledgeable or ignorant about much of the world in which they live.

Of course, some among us are fortunate enough to be well educated, have a reasonably wide knowledge of the world about us, and have the gift of faith as well. If we have those characteristics, it is probably due to a combination of fortunate circumstances, the support and love of others, and hard work.

Then there's the matter of just what you may mean by a "...more guaranteed preferred future". As far as I know, there is no guarantee of any future, preferred or otherwise, except perhaps that we are sure to die one day.

As to institutuional religion, I'd suggest that it's best to distinguish between faith in a Creator and affiliation in a religious institution. Faith is primary, I say. If, or when, a religious institution becomes an impediment to faith, then set aside that impediment. When a religious institution supports and nourishes your journey of faith, then embrace it, or more particularly those who are its members, and dance together to the tune of the Creator who calls you forth in joy.

Mark G / California

Not yet rated.

Luke Timothy Johnson RE:

Luke Timothy Johnson

RE: Determining what the “faith” of a Post Axial Age ought to be requires more time and further discussion.

Yes, indeed, skollershup cha-rumps!

And, in that vein, I commend the scholarship of Luke Timothy Johnson to serious inquirers regarding Christology and Biblical scholarship. You'll find his books on Amazon, his DVDs and Cds at The Teaching Company and his academic contributions in scholarly journals. Or, if pressed for time, just Google this syntax, which is his name in quotation marks: "Luke Timothy Johnson"

I'll give you the executive summary of Johnson's oeuvre as re: the proposition that "Christianity has run its course": Huh?

re: So let’s postpone that discussion in the light of planet Earth’s emergency situation and consider what we should do.

So as not to muddy up this thread with the first discussion per the polite request of the facilitator, I hope to continue epistemological discussions here:
http://ncrcafe.org/node/1136 which is titled "Science Constrains Theology?"

pax!
jb

Not yet rated.